小婴儿呼吸衰竭初期治疗阶段的无创通气或 CPAP。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.4187/respcare.11935
Andrew G Miller, Karan R Kumar, Bhargav S Adagarla, Kaitlyn E Haynes, Rachel M Gates, Jeanette L Muddiman, Travis S Heath, Veerajalandhar Allareddy, Alexandre T Rotta
{"title":"小婴儿呼吸衰竭初期治疗阶段的无创通气或 CPAP。","authors":"Andrew G Miller, Karan R Kumar, Bhargav S Adagarla, Kaitlyn E Haynes, Rachel M Gates, Jeanette L Muddiman, Travis S Heath, Veerajalandhar Allareddy, Alexandre T Rotta","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Respiratory failure in infants is a common reason for admission to the pediatric ICU (PICU). Although high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is the preferred first-line treatment at our institution, some infants require CPAP or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Here we report our experience using CPAP/NIV in infants <10 kg. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective review of infants <10 kg treated with CPAP/NIV in our PICUs between July 2017-May 2021 in the initial phase of treatment. Demographic, support type and settings, vital signs, pulse oximetry, and intubation data were extracted from the electronic health record. We compared subjects successfully treated with CPAP/NIV with those who required intubation. <b>Results:</b> We studied 62 subjects with median (interquartile range) age 96 [6.5-308] d and weight 4.5 (3.4-6.6) kg. Of these, 22 (35%) required intubation. There were no significant differences in demographics, medical history, primary interface, pre-CPAP/NIV support, and device used to deliver CPAP/NIV. HFNC was used in 57 (92%) subjects before escalation to CPAP/NIV. Subjects who failed CPAP/NIV were less likely to have bronchiolitis (27% vs 60%, <i>P</i> = .040), less likely to be discharged from the hospital to home (68% vs 93%, <i>P</i> = .02), had a longer median hospital length of stay (LOS) (26.9 [21-50.5] d vs 10.4 [5.6-28.4] d, <i>P</i> = .002), and longer median ICU LOS (14.6 [7.9-25.2] d vs 5.8 [3.8-12.4] d, <i>P</i> = .004). Initial vital signs and F<sub>IO<sub>2</sub></sub> were similar, but S<sub>pO<sub>2</sub></sub> was lower and F<sub>IO<sub>2</sub></sub> higher at 6 h and 12 h after support initiation for subjects who failed CPAP/NIV. Initial CPAP/NIV settings were similar, but subjects who failed CPAP/NIV had higher maximum and final inspiratory/expiratory pressure. <b>Conclusions:</b> Most infants who failed initial HFNC support were successfully managed without intubation using NIV or CPAP. Bronchiolitis was associated with a lower rate of CPAP/NIV failure, whereas lower S<sub>pO<sub>2</sub></sub> and higher F<sub>IO<sub>2</sub></sub> levels were associated with higher rates of intubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive Ventilation or CPAP in the Initial Treatment Phase of Small Infants With Respiratory Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew G Miller, Karan R Kumar, Bhargav S Adagarla, Kaitlyn E Haynes, Rachel M Gates, Jeanette L Muddiman, Travis S Heath, Veerajalandhar Allareddy, Alexandre T Rotta\",\"doi\":\"10.4187/respcare.11935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Respiratory failure in infants is a common reason for admission to the pediatric ICU (PICU). Although high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is the preferred first-line treatment at our institution, some infants require CPAP or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Here we report our experience using CPAP/NIV in infants <10 kg. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective review of infants <10 kg treated with CPAP/NIV in our PICUs between July 2017-May 2021 in the initial phase of treatment. Demographic, support type and settings, vital signs, pulse oximetry, and intubation data were extracted from the electronic health record. We compared subjects successfully treated with CPAP/NIV with those who required intubation. <b>Results:</b> We studied 62 subjects with median (interquartile range) age 96 [6.5-308] d and weight 4.5 (3.4-6.6) kg. Of these, 22 (35%) required intubation. There were no significant differences in demographics, medical history, primary interface, pre-CPAP/NIV support, and device used to deliver CPAP/NIV. HFNC was used in 57 (92%) subjects before escalation to CPAP/NIV. Subjects who failed CPAP/NIV were less likely to have bronchiolitis (27% vs 60%, <i>P</i> = .040), less likely to be discharged from the hospital to home (68% vs 93%, <i>P</i> = .02), had a longer median hospital length of stay (LOS) (26.9 [21-50.5] d vs 10.4 [5.6-28.4] d, <i>P</i> = .002), and longer median ICU LOS (14.6 [7.9-25.2] d vs 5.8 [3.8-12.4] d, <i>P</i> = .004). Initial vital signs and F<sub>IO<sub>2</sub></sub> were similar, but S<sub>pO<sub>2</sub></sub> was lower and F<sub>IO<sub>2</sub></sub> higher at 6 h and 12 h after support initiation for subjects who failed CPAP/NIV. Initial CPAP/NIV settings were similar, but subjects who failed CPAP/NIV had higher maximum and final inspiratory/expiratory pressure. <b>Conclusions:</b> Most infants who failed initial HFNC support were successfully managed without intubation using NIV or CPAP. Bronchiolitis was associated with a lower rate of CPAP/NIV failure, whereas lower S<sub>pO<sub>2</sub></sub> and higher F<sub>IO<sub>2</sub></sub> levels were associated with higher rates of intubation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"161-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11935\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:婴儿呼吸衰竭是儿科重症监护室 (PICU) 的常见入院原因。虽然高流量鼻插管(HFNC)是我院首选的一线治疗方法,但有些婴儿仍需要 CPAP 或无创通气(NIV)。在此,我们报告了对体重小于 10 公斤的婴儿使用 CPAP/NIV 的经验:我们对 2017 年 7 月至 2021 年 5 月期间在我院 PICU 治疗初期使用 CPAP/NIV 治疗的体重小于 10 公斤的婴儿进行了回顾性审查。我们从电子健康记录中提取了人口统计学、支持类型和设置、生命体征、脉搏血氧饱和度和插管数据。我们将使用 CPAP/NIV 成功治疗的受试者与需要插管的受试者进行了比较:我们研究了 62 名受试者,他们的中位数(四分位数间距)年龄为 96 [6.5-308] d,体重为 4.5 (3.4-6.6) kg。其中 22 人(35%)需要插管。在人口统计学、病史、主要界面、CPAP/NIV 前支持以及提供 CPAP/NIV 的设备方面没有明显差异。57 名受试者(92%)在升级到 CPAP/NIV 之前使用了高频呼吸机。CPAP/NIV 治疗失败的受试者患支气管炎的几率较低(27% 对 60%,P = .040),出院回家的几率较低(68% 对 93%,P = .02),中位住院时间(LOS)更长(26.9 [21-50.5] d vs 10.4 [5.6-28.4] d,P = .002),重症监护室中位住院时间更长(14.6 [7.9-25.2] d vs 5.8 [3.8-12.4] d,P = .004)。初始生命体征和 FIO2 相似,但在开始使用 CPAP/NIV 支持后 6 小时和 12 小时,CPAP/NIV 支持失败的受试者 SpO2 更低,FIO2 更高。初始 CPAP/NIV 设置相似,但 CPAP/NIV 失败的受试者的最大和最终吸气/呼气压力更高:结论:大多数最初的高频核磁支持失败的婴儿都能在不插管的情况下使用 NIV 或 CPAP 成功地进行治疗。支气管炎与较低的 CPAP/NIV 失败率有关,而较低的 SpO2 和较高的 FIO2 水平与较高的插管率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive Ventilation or CPAP in the Initial Treatment Phase of Small Infants With Respiratory Failure.

Background: Respiratory failure in infants is a common reason for admission to the pediatric ICU (PICU). Although high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is the preferred first-line treatment at our institution, some infants require CPAP or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Here we report our experience using CPAP/NIV in infants <10 kg. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of infants <10 kg treated with CPAP/NIV in our PICUs between July 2017-May 2021 in the initial phase of treatment. Demographic, support type and settings, vital signs, pulse oximetry, and intubation data were extracted from the electronic health record. We compared subjects successfully treated with CPAP/NIV with those who required intubation. Results: We studied 62 subjects with median (interquartile range) age 96 [6.5-308] d and weight 4.5 (3.4-6.6) kg. Of these, 22 (35%) required intubation. There were no significant differences in demographics, medical history, primary interface, pre-CPAP/NIV support, and device used to deliver CPAP/NIV. HFNC was used in 57 (92%) subjects before escalation to CPAP/NIV. Subjects who failed CPAP/NIV were less likely to have bronchiolitis (27% vs 60%, P = .040), less likely to be discharged from the hospital to home (68% vs 93%, P = .02), had a longer median hospital length of stay (LOS) (26.9 [21-50.5] d vs 10.4 [5.6-28.4] d, P = .002), and longer median ICU LOS (14.6 [7.9-25.2] d vs 5.8 [3.8-12.4] d, P = .004). Initial vital signs and FIO2 were similar, but SpO2 was lower and FIO2 higher at 6 h and 12 h after support initiation for subjects who failed CPAP/NIV. Initial CPAP/NIV settings were similar, but subjects who failed CPAP/NIV had higher maximum and final inspiratory/expiratory pressure. Conclusions: Most infants who failed initial HFNC support were successfully managed without intubation using NIV or CPAP. Bronchiolitis was associated with a lower rate of CPAP/NIV failure, whereas lower SpO2 and higher FIO2 levels were associated with higher rates of intubation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信