"什么能帮助您缓解腰痛?对接受过阿片类药物治疗的成人慢性腰痛患者疼痛管理策略的定性分析。

Q3 Medicine
David K Woods, Evan O Nelson, Linda Denise Oakley, Fatih Kunkul, Bruce P Barrett, Nguyen Hua, Cindy A Burzinski, Robert R Edwards, Eric L Garland, Aleksandra E Zgierska
{"title":"\"什么能帮助您缓解腰痛?对接受过阿片类药物治疗的成人慢性腰痛患者疼痛管理策略的定性分析。","authors":"David K Woods, Evan O Nelson, Linda Denise Oakley, Fatih Kunkul, Bruce P Barrett, Nguyen Hua, Cindy A Burzinski, Robert R Edwards, Eric L Garland, Aleksandra E Zgierska","doi":"10.5055/jom.0867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this qualitative analysis was to better understand what pain management strategies adults with opioid-treated chronic low back pain (CLBP) found most helpful.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A subgroup of participants from a larger randomized control trial of two psychological interventions were asked: \"What helps your back pain?\" at baseline and 12 months (exit) in brief, video-recorded interviews. Videos were analyzed using qualitative thematic content analysis utilizing Transana™.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants were recruited from the community and outpatient clinics in three United States sites.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventy-nine adults with long-term (≥3 months) opioid-treated (≥15 mg/day morphine equivalent) CLBP.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Participants' baseline and exit qualitative responses to the question \"What helps your back pain?\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, participants identified medication (n = 63), body position (n = 59), thermal application (n = 50), physical activity (n = 49), and stretching (n = 24) as the CLBP management strategies they found helpful. At exit, the reports of medication (n = 55), physical activity (n = 41), and stretching (n = 21) were often considered helpful for CLBP and remained relatively stable, while position (n = 36) and thermal application (n = 35) strategies were mentioned less frequently and psychological strategies (n = 29) were mentioned more frequently (up from n = 5) compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over time, the reports of medication and active pain management strategies, eg, physical activity, remained stable, while the reports of some passive pain management strategies, eg, position and thermal, declined over time. Increased use of psychological strategies implies that study interventions were incorporated as useful pain self-management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"20 3","pages":"209-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"What helps your back pain?\\\" A qualitative analysis of pain management strategies in opioid-treated adults with chronic low back pain.\",\"authors\":\"David K Woods, Evan O Nelson, Linda Denise Oakley, Fatih Kunkul, Bruce P Barrett, Nguyen Hua, Cindy A Burzinski, Robert R Edwards, Eric L Garland, Aleksandra E Zgierska\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/jom.0867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this qualitative analysis was to better understand what pain management strategies adults with opioid-treated chronic low back pain (CLBP) found most helpful.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A subgroup of participants from a larger randomized control trial of two psychological interventions were asked: \\\"What helps your back pain?\\\" at baseline and 12 months (exit) in brief, video-recorded interviews. Videos were analyzed using qualitative thematic content analysis utilizing Transana™.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants were recruited from the community and outpatient clinics in three United States sites.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventy-nine adults with long-term (≥3 months) opioid-treated (≥15 mg/day morphine equivalent) CLBP.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Participants' baseline and exit qualitative responses to the question \\\"What helps your back pain?\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, participants identified medication (n = 63), body position (n = 59), thermal application (n = 50), physical activity (n = 49), and stretching (n = 24) as the CLBP management strategies they found helpful. At exit, the reports of medication (n = 55), physical activity (n = 41), and stretching (n = 21) were often considered helpful for CLBP and remained relatively stable, while position (n = 36) and thermal application (n = 35) strategies were mentioned less frequently and psychological strategies (n = 29) were mentioned more frequently (up from n = 5) compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over time, the reports of medication and active pain management strategies, eg, physical activity, remained stable, while the reports of some passive pain management strategies, eg, position and thermal, declined over time. Increased use of psychological strategies implies that study interventions were incorporated as useful pain self-management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of opioid management\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"209-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of opioid management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本定性分析旨在更好地了解接受阿片类药物治疗的慢性腰背痛(CLBP)成人认为哪些疼痛管理策略最有帮助:设计: 在一项针对两种心理干预措施的大型随机对照试验中,我们向一组参与者提问:"什么对您的背痛有帮助?"在基线和 12 个月(退出)时,通过简短的视频录制访谈询问 "什么对您的背痛有帮助?我们利用 Transana™.Setting 对视频进行了定性主题内容分析:参与者从美国三个地点的社区和门诊诊所招募:79名长期(≥3个月)接受阿片类药物治疗(≥15 mg/天吗啡当量)的CLBP成人:主要结果测量指标:参与者对 "是什么帮助了您的背痛?"这一问题的基线和离线定性回答:基线时,参与者认为药物治疗(63 人)、体位(59 人)、热敷(50 人)、体育活动(49 人)和拉伸(24 人)是他们认为有帮助的慢性背痛管理策略。与基线相比,药物治疗(n = 55)、体力活动(n = 41)和拉伸(n = 21)经常被认为对慢性背痛有帮助,并且保持相对稳定,而体位(n = 36)和热敷(n = 35)策略被提及的频率较低,心理策略(n = 29)被提及的频率较高(从 n = 5 上升):随着时间的推移,药物治疗和主动止痛策略(如体育锻炼)的报告保持稳定,而一些被动止痛策略(如体位和热敷)的报告随着时间的推移有所下降。心理策略使用率的提高意味着研究干预措施被纳入了有用的疼痛自我管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"What helps your back pain?" A qualitative analysis of pain management strategies in opioid-treated adults with chronic low back pain.

Objective: The purpose of this qualitative analysis was to better understand what pain management strategies adults with opioid-treated chronic low back pain (CLBP) found most helpful.

Design: A subgroup of participants from a larger randomized control trial of two psychological interventions were asked: "What helps your back pain?" at baseline and 12 months (exit) in brief, video-recorded interviews. Videos were analyzed using qualitative thematic content analysis utilizing Transana™.

Setting: Participants were recruited from the community and outpatient clinics in three United States sites.

Participants: Seventy-nine adults with long-term (≥3 months) opioid-treated (≥15 mg/day morphine equivalent) CLBP.

Main outcome measure(s): Participants' baseline and exit qualitative responses to the question "What helps your back pain?"

Results: At baseline, participants identified medication (n = 63), body position (n = 59), thermal application (n = 50), physical activity (n = 49), and stretching (n = 24) as the CLBP management strategies they found helpful. At exit, the reports of medication (n = 55), physical activity (n = 41), and stretching (n = 21) were often considered helpful for CLBP and remained relatively stable, while position (n = 36) and thermal application (n = 35) strategies were mentioned less frequently and psychological strategies (n = 29) were mentioned more frequently (up from n = 5) compared to baseline.

Conclusions: Over time, the reports of medication and active pain management strategies, eg, physical activity, remained stable, while the reports of some passive pain management strategies, eg, position and thermal, declined over time. Increased use of psychological strategies implies that study interventions were incorporated as useful pain self-management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信