轻量级、中等重量级和重量级受试者在单轴垂直振动下的坐姿生物动力学反应

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
{"title":"轻量级、中等重量级和重量级受试者在单轴垂直振动下的坐姿生物动力学反应","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lack of the biodynamic data of lightweight and heavyweight human bodies in seating posture becomes an impediment to developing dynamic dummies and relevant standards for improving vehicle ride comfort and reducing health risks caused by vibration. To acquire missing data and gain an understanding of relevant biodynamic responses, the vertical apparent masses of seated subjects in lightweight and heavyweight groups as well as the mediumweight group (targeted mass 55 kg, 98–115 kg, and 75 kg) were experimentally measured and studied under 9 vibration magnitudes (0.25, 0.315, 0.4, 0.5, 0.63, 0.8, 1.0, 1.25 and 1.6 ms<sup>−2</sup> r.m.s. with a common ratio of ca. 1.25) without and with the support of an upright backrest. Each group had twelve subjects. With an increase in the vibration magnitude from 0.25 to 1.6 ms<sup>−2</sup> r.m.s., the resonance frequency of the vertical apparent mass showed a decreasing trend. This was observed with all three bodyweight groups and two backrest conditions. Results of pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed that, when the vibration magnitude increased by a factor of ca. 1.25, its effect on the resonance frequency was statistically insignificant in most cases. The results provided data on the vertical apparent mass for the heavyweight subjects that have not been reported and augmented the database of those for the lightweight subjects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000684/pdfft?md5=bb76c9db5975aa4c1035d05a6e9913ab&pid=1-s2.0-S0169814124000684-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodynamic responses of lightweight, mediumweight and heavyweight subjects in seating posture exposed to single-axis vertical vibration\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lack of the biodynamic data of lightweight and heavyweight human bodies in seating posture becomes an impediment to developing dynamic dummies and relevant standards for improving vehicle ride comfort and reducing health risks caused by vibration. To acquire missing data and gain an understanding of relevant biodynamic responses, the vertical apparent masses of seated subjects in lightweight and heavyweight groups as well as the mediumweight group (targeted mass 55 kg, 98–115 kg, and 75 kg) were experimentally measured and studied under 9 vibration magnitudes (0.25, 0.315, 0.4, 0.5, 0.63, 0.8, 1.0, 1.25 and 1.6 ms<sup>−2</sup> r.m.s. with a common ratio of ca. 1.25) without and with the support of an upright backrest. Each group had twelve subjects. With an increase in the vibration magnitude from 0.25 to 1.6 ms<sup>−2</sup> r.m.s., the resonance frequency of the vertical apparent mass showed a decreasing trend. This was observed with all three bodyweight groups and two backrest conditions. Results of pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed that, when the vibration magnitude increased by a factor of ca. 1.25, its effect on the resonance frequency was statistically insignificant in most cases. The results provided data on the vertical apparent mass for the heavyweight subjects that have not been reported and augmented the database of those for the lightweight subjects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000684/pdfft?md5=bb76c9db5975aa4c1035d05a6e9913ab&pid=1-s2.0-S0169814124000684-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000684\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000684","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缺乏轻量级和重量级人体在坐姿下的生物动力学数据,阻碍了动态假人和相关标准的制定,从而无法改善车辆的乘坐舒适性,降低振动对健康造成的危害。为了获得缺失的数据并了解相关的生物动力学响应,我们对轻量级组、重量级组和中量级组(目标质量分别为 55 千克、98-115 千克和 75 千克)的坐姿受试者的垂直视质量进行了实验测量,并在 9 种振动量级(0.25、0.315、0.4、0.5、0.63、0.8、1.0、1.25 和 1.6 ms-2 r.m.s.,普通比率约为 1.25)下进行了测量和研究。每组有 12 名受试者。随着振动幅度从 0.25 到 1.6 ms-2 r.m.s.的增加,垂直视质量的共振频率呈下降趋势。这在所有三个体重组和两种靠背条件下都能观察到。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验的结果表明,当振动幅度增加约 1.25 倍时,其对共振频率的影响在大多数情况下并不明显。这些结果提供了有关重量级受试者垂直视质量的数据,而这些数据尚未见诸报道,同时还扩充了轻量级受试者的数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biodynamic responses of lightweight, mediumweight and heavyweight subjects in seating posture exposed to single-axis vertical vibration

Lack of the biodynamic data of lightweight and heavyweight human bodies in seating posture becomes an impediment to developing dynamic dummies and relevant standards for improving vehicle ride comfort and reducing health risks caused by vibration. To acquire missing data and gain an understanding of relevant biodynamic responses, the vertical apparent masses of seated subjects in lightweight and heavyweight groups as well as the mediumweight group (targeted mass 55 kg, 98–115 kg, and 75 kg) were experimentally measured and studied under 9 vibration magnitudes (0.25, 0.315, 0.4, 0.5, 0.63, 0.8, 1.0, 1.25 and 1.6 ms−2 r.m.s. with a common ratio of ca. 1.25) without and with the support of an upright backrest. Each group had twelve subjects. With an increase in the vibration magnitude from 0.25 to 1.6 ms−2 r.m.s., the resonance frequency of the vertical apparent mass showed a decreasing trend. This was observed with all three bodyweight groups and two backrest conditions. Results of pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed that, when the vibration magnitude increased by a factor of ca. 1.25, its effect on the resonance frequency was statistically insignificant in most cases. The results provided data on the vertical apparent mass for the heavyweight subjects that have not been reported and augmented the database of those for the lightweight subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信