2019年冠状病毒疾病大流行期间心房颤动和消融治疗的趋势。

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Pub Date : 2024-07-15 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.19102/icrm.2024.15074
Anmol Johal, Joseph Heaton, Abbas Alshami, Ndausung Udongwo, Steven Imburgio, Anton Mararenko, Brett Sealove, Jesus Almendral, Jeffrey Selan, Riple Hansalia
{"title":"2019年冠状病毒疾病大流行期间心房颤动和消融治疗的趋势。","authors":"Anmol Johal, Joseph Heaton, Abbas Alshami, Ndausung Udongwo, Steven Imburgio, Anton Mararenko, Brett Sealove, Jesus Almendral, Jeffrey Selan, Riple Hansalia","doi":"10.19102/icrm.2024.15074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected many aspects of health care and continues to have an impact as waves of COVID-19 cases re-emerge. Many procedures were negatively impacted by the pandemic, and management was primarily focused on limiting exposure to the virus. We present an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to delineate how COVID-19 affected atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The NIS was analyzed from 2017-2020 in order to determine the pre- and intra-pandemic impacts on AF ablation procedures. Admissions were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes with a primary diagnosis of AF (ICD-10 CM code I48.0, I48.1, I48.2, or I48.91). Admissions were also assessed for the use of cardiac ablation therapy. Comorbidity diagnoses were identified using the Elixhauser comorbidity software (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Rockville, MD, USA); additional ICD-10 codes for diagnoses and procedures used are also provided. The primary outcome of our study was the trend in ablation therapy during AF admissions. Secondary outcomes included health care disparities, inpatient mortality, and length of stay. Ablation therapy was used in 18,885 admissions in 2020, compared to the preceding 3-year average of 20,103 (adjusted Wald test, <i>P</i> = .002). Multivariate logistic regression revealed a greater likelihood of undergoing ablation therapy (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.40; <i>P</i> < .001) among 2020 admissions compared to 2017 admissions. Inpatient mortality increased in 2020 compared to the preceding average; however, the difference was not significant. The procedural volume of ablation for AF saw a decrease in 2020; however, surprisingly, more patients were likely to undergo ablation during 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":36299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","volume":"15 7","pages":"5955-5962"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Atrial Fibrillation and Ablation Therapy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Anmol Johal, Joseph Heaton, Abbas Alshami, Ndausung Udongwo, Steven Imburgio, Anton Mararenko, Brett Sealove, Jesus Almendral, Jeffrey Selan, Riple Hansalia\",\"doi\":\"10.19102/icrm.2024.15074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected many aspects of health care and continues to have an impact as waves of COVID-19 cases re-emerge. Many procedures were negatively impacted by the pandemic, and management was primarily focused on limiting exposure to the virus. We present an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to delineate how COVID-19 affected atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The NIS was analyzed from 2017-2020 in order to determine the pre- and intra-pandemic impacts on AF ablation procedures. Admissions were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes with a primary diagnosis of AF (ICD-10 CM code I48.0, I48.1, I48.2, or I48.91). Admissions were also assessed for the use of cardiac ablation therapy. Comorbidity diagnoses were identified using the Elixhauser comorbidity software (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Rockville, MD, USA); additional ICD-10 codes for diagnoses and procedures used are also provided. The primary outcome of our study was the trend in ablation therapy during AF admissions. Secondary outcomes included health care disparities, inpatient mortality, and length of stay. Ablation therapy was used in 18,885 admissions in 2020, compared to the preceding 3-year average of 20,103 (adjusted Wald test, <i>P</i> = .002). Multivariate logistic regression revealed a greater likelihood of undergoing ablation therapy (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.40; <i>P</i> < .001) among 2020 admissions compared to 2017 admissions. Inpatient mortality increased in 2020 compared to the preceding average; however, the difference was not significant. The procedural volume of ablation for AF saw a decrease in 2020; however, surprisingly, more patients were likely to undergo ablation during 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management\",\"volume\":\"15 7\",\"pages\":\"5955-5962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2024.15074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2024.15074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行影响了医疗保健的许多方面,随着 COVID-19 病例的一波又一波出现,其影响仍在继续。许多程序都受到了大流行的负面影响,管理的主要重点是限制病毒暴露。我们对全国住院患者样本(NIS)进行了分析,以了解 COVID-19 对心房颤动(AF)消融术的影响。我们对 2017-2020 年间的全国住院病人样本进行了分析,以确定疫情流行前后对房颤消融术的影响。入院病例使用《国际疾病分类》第 10 版临床修订代码进行识别,主要诊断为房颤(ICD-10 CM 代码 I48.0、I48.1、I48.2 或 I48.91)。此外,还对入院患者是否使用心脏消融疗法进行了评估。合并症诊断是通过 Elixhauser 合并症软件(美国马里兰州罗克维尔市医疗保健研究与质量机构、医疗保健成本与利用项目)确定的;另外还提供了所使用的诊断和手术的 ICD-10 编码。我们研究的主要结果是房颤入院期间消融治疗的趋势。次要结果包括医疗保健差异、住院患者死亡率和住院时间。2020 年有 18,885 例入院患者使用了消融治疗,而前三年的平均值为 20,103 例(调整 Wald 检验,P = .002)。多变量逻辑回归显示,与 2017 年的入院患者相比,2020 年的入院患者接受消融治疗的可能性更大(几率比,1.24;95% 置信区间,1.10-1.40;P < .001)。与之前的平均水平相比,2020 年的住院患者死亡率有所上升,但差异并不显著。2020年心房颤动消融术的手术量有所下降;但令人惊讶的是,2020年可能有更多患者接受消融术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Atrial Fibrillation and Ablation Therapy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected many aspects of health care and continues to have an impact as waves of COVID-19 cases re-emerge. Many procedures were negatively impacted by the pandemic, and management was primarily focused on limiting exposure to the virus. We present an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to delineate how COVID-19 affected atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The NIS was analyzed from 2017-2020 in order to determine the pre- and intra-pandemic impacts on AF ablation procedures. Admissions were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes with a primary diagnosis of AF (ICD-10 CM code I48.0, I48.1, I48.2, or I48.91). Admissions were also assessed for the use of cardiac ablation therapy. Comorbidity diagnoses were identified using the Elixhauser comorbidity software (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Rockville, MD, USA); additional ICD-10 codes for diagnoses and procedures used are also provided. The primary outcome of our study was the trend in ablation therapy during AF admissions. Secondary outcomes included health care disparities, inpatient mortality, and length of stay. Ablation therapy was used in 18,885 admissions in 2020, compared to the preceding 3-year average of 20,103 (adjusted Wald test, P = .002). Multivariate logistic regression revealed a greater likelihood of undergoing ablation therapy (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.40; P < .001) among 2020 admissions compared to 2017 admissions. Inpatient mortality increased in 2020 compared to the preceding average; however, the difference was not significant. The procedural volume of ablation for AF saw a decrease in 2020; however, surprisingly, more patients were likely to undergo ablation during 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信