吗啡抗痛剂量对脊髓损伤大鼠细胞疗法的影响

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Molecular Neurobiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s12035-024-04350-x
Samaneh Farrokhfar, Taki Tiraihi, Mansoureh Movahedin, Hossein Azizi
{"title":"吗啡抗痛剂量对脊髓损伤大鼠细胞疗法的影响","authors":"Samaneh Farrokhfar, Taki Tiraihi, Mansoureh Movahedin, Hossein Azizi","doi":"10.1007/s12035-024-04350-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a sensory-motor injury. Today, combined treatments such as cell therapy along with drug therapy and their interactions are of interest. Morphine is an opioid drug used to relieve intolerable pain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an antinociceptive dose of morphine (with minimal tolerance/dependence but effective pain relief) on cell therapy in SCI. The antinociceptive dose of morphine was determined in rats with SCI through the Hargreaves and naloxone-induced morphine withdrawal tests. The rats were then allocated to 5 groups: laminectomy, SCI, SCI + Morphine, SCI + cell therapy, SCI + Morphine + cell therapy. The antinociceptive dose (5 mg/kg) was administered on days 1, 4, 10, and 13 (i.p.) post-SCI. On day 7, Neural-like stem cells derived from adipose tissue were transplanted intraspinally into the injured animals, and they were monitored for 12 weeks. The outcomes were assessed using the BBB test, somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), and histology. The BBB test indicated that morphine significantly hindered functional recovery post-cell transplantation compared to animals receiving only cell therapy (p < 0.05). In the SSEP test, the analysis of amplitude and latency of waves did not reveal a significant difference (p > 0.05). The histological results showed that cell therapy reduced the cavity size post-SCI, while morphine had no significant impact on it. Morphine at the antinociceptive dose significantly impairs motor recovery despite cell therapy. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of sensory pathway outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18762,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Neurobiology","volume":" ","pages":"1620-1630"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Antinociceptive Dose of Morphine on Cell Therapy in Rats with Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Samaneh Farrokhfar, Taki Tiraihi, Mansoureh Movahedin, Hossein Azizi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12035-024-04350-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a sensory-motor injury. Today, combined treatments such as cell therapy along with drug therapy and their interactions are of interest. Morphine is an opioid drug used to relieve intolerable pain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an antinociceptive dose of morphine (with minimal tolerance/dependence but effective pain relief) on cell therapy in SCI. The antinociceptive dose of morphine was determined in rats with SCI through the Hargreaves and naloxone-induced morphine withdrawal tests. The rats were then allocated to 5 groups: laminectomy, SCI, SCI + Morphine, SCI + cell therapy, SCI + Morphine + cell therapy. The antinociceptive dose (5 mg/kg) was administered on days 1, 4, 10, and 13 (i.p.) post-SCI. On day 7, Neural-like stem cells derived from adipose tissue were transplanted intraspinally into the injured animals, and they were monitored for 12 weeks. The outcomes were assessed using the BBB test, somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), and histology. The BBB test indicated that morphine significantly hindered functional recovery post-cell transplantation compared to animals receiving only cell therapy (p < 0.05). In the SSEP test, the analysis of amplitude and latency of waves did not reveal a significant difference (p > 0.05). The histological results showed that cell therapy reduced the cavity size post-SCI, while morphine had no significant impact on it. Morphine at the antinociceptive dose significantly impairs motor recovery despite cell therapy. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of sensory pathway outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Neurobiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1620-1630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-024-04350-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-024-04350-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脊髓损伤(SCI)是一种感觉运动损伤。如今,细胞疗法、药物疗法等综合疗法及其相互作用备受关注。吗啡是一种阿片类药物,用于缓解难以忍受的疼痛。本研究旨在评估抗痛觉剂量吗啡(具有最小耐受性/依赖性但能有效缓解疼痛)对 SCI 细胞疗法的影响。通过哈格里夫斯试验和纳洛酮诱导的吗啡戒断试验,确定了脊髓损伤大鼠的吗啡抗痛觉剂量。然后将大鼠分为 5 组:椎板切除术组、SCI 组、SCI + 吗啡组、SCI + 细胞疗法组、SCI + 吗啡 + 细胞疗法组。在SCI后第1、4、10和13天(静脉注射)抗痛觉剂量(5毫克/千克)。第7天,将源自脂肪组织的类神经干细胞移植到受伤动物的椎管内,并对其进行为期12周的监测。结果通过BBB测试、体感诱发电位(SSEP)和组织学进行评估。BBB测试表明,与只接受细胞治疗的动物相比,吗啡明显阻碍了细胞移植后的功能恢复(p < 0.05)。在SSEP测试中,对波幅和潜伏期的分析未发现明显差异(p > 0.05)。组织学结果显示,细胞疗法缩小了 SCI 后的腔隙大小,而吗啡对其没有明显影响。尽管采用了细胞疗法,抗痛觉剂量的吗啡仍会明显影响运动恢复。不过,就感觉通路结果而言,各组之间没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Antinociceptive Dose of Morphine on Cell Therapy in Rats with Spinal Cord Injury.

The Effect of Antinociceptive Dose of Morphine on Cell Therapy in Rats with Spinal Cord Injury.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a sensory-motor injury. Today, combined treatments such as cell therapy along with drug therapy and their interactions are of interest. Morphine is an opioid drug used to relieve intolerable pain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an antinociceptive dose of morphine (with minimal tolerance/dependence but effective pain relief) on cell therapy in SCI. The antinociceptive dose of morphine was determined in rats with SCI through the Hargreaves and naloxone-induced morphine withdrawal tests. The rats were then allocated to 5 groups: laminectomy, SCI, SCI + Morphine, SCI + cell therapy, SCI + Morphine + cell therapy. The antinociceptive dose (5 mg/kg) was administered on days 1, 4, 10, and 13 (i.p.) post-SCI. On day 7, Neural-like stem cells derived from adipose tissue were transplanted intraspinally into the injured animals, and they were monitored for 12 weeks. The outcomes were assessed using the BBB test, somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), and histology. The BBB test indicated that morphine significantly hindered functional recovery post-cell transplantation compared to animals receiving only cell therapy (p < 0.05). In the SSEP test, the analysis of amplitude and latency of waves did not reveal a significant difference (p > 0.05). The histological results showed that cell therapy reduced the cavity size post-SCI, while morphine had no significant impact on it. Morphine at the antinociceptive dose significantly impairs motor recovery despite cell therapy. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of sensory pathway outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Neurobiology
Molecular Neurobiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Neurobiology is an exciting journal for neuroscientists needing to stay in close touch with progress at the forefront of molecular brain research today. It is an especially important periodical for graduate students and "postdocs," specifically designed to synthesize and critically assess research trends for all neuroscientists hoping to stay active at the cutting edge of this dramatically developing area. This journal has proven to be crucial in departmental libraries, serving as essential reading for every committed neuroscientist who is striving to keep abreast of all rapid developments in a forefront field. Most recent significant advances in experimental and clinical neuroscience have been occurring at the molecular level. Until now, there has been no journal devoted to looking closely at this fragmented literature in a critical, coherent fashion. Each submission is thoroughly analyzed by scientists and clinicians internationally renowned for their special competence in the areas treated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信