新型疗法在复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤中的实际疗效。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Leukemia & Lymphoma Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1080/10428194.2024.2371472
Jennifer L Crombie, Monika Jun, Tongsheng Wang, Alex Mutebi, Anthony Wang, Anindit Chhibber, Rajesh Kamalakar, Jon Ukropec, Julie Blaedel, Anupama Kalsekar
{"title":"新型疗法在复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤中的实际疗效。","authors":"Jennifer L Crombie, Monika Jun, Tongsheng Wang, Alex Mutebi, Anthony Wang, Anindit Chhibber, Rajesh Kamalakar, Jon Ukropec, Julie Blaedel, Anupama Kalsekar","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2024.2371472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study used COTA de-identified data (2010-2021) of patients in the US to explore outcomes of novel therapies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in real-world settings. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL who received novel treatments including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy and tafasitamab- or polatuzumab-based therapies were evaluated. Overall, 175 patients with R/R DLBCL were analyzed; 73, 69, and 27 received CAR T therapy, polatuzumab-based regimens, and tafasitamab-based regimens, respectively. In patients who had ≥1 prior lines of therapy (i.e. starting second-line or later therapy; 2 L+), CAR T, polatuzumab-based regimens, and tafasitamab-based regimens achieved a median overall survival of 26.5, 7.8, and 6.3 months, respectively. Outcomes were particularly poor for patients with relapse following CAR T, indicating that polatuzumab- and tafasitamab-based regimens in 2 L + R/R DLBCL have suboptimal outcomes in the real world. Additional treatment options are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world outcomes with novel therapies in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Crombie, Monika Jun, Tongsheng Wang, Alex Mutebi, Anthony Wang, Anindit Chhibber, Rajesh Kamalakar, Jon Ukropec, Julie Blaedel, Anupama Kalsekar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428194.2024.2371472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study used COTA de-identified data (2010-2021) of patients in the US to explore outcomes of novel therapies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in real-world settings. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL who received novel treatments including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy and tafasitamab- or polatuzumab-based therapies were evaluated. Overall, 175 patients with R/R DLBCL were analyzed; 73, 69, and 27 received CAR T therapy, polatuzumab-based regimens, and tafasitamab-based regimens, respectively. In patients who had ≥1 prior lines of therapy (i.e. starting second-line or later therapy; 2 L+), CAR T, polatuzumab-based regimens, and tafasitamab-based regimens achieved a median overall survival of 26.5, 7.8, and 6.3 months, respectively. Outcomes were particularly poor for patients with relapse following CAR T, indicating that polatuzumab- and tafasitamab-based regimens in 2 L + R/R DLBCL have suboptimal outcomes in the real world. Additional treatment options are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2371472\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2371472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究使用了美国患者的 COTA 去标识化数据(2010-2021 年),以探讨新型疗法在真实世界中治疗复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 的疗效。我们评估了接受新型疗法(包括嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR T)疗法和基于他法西单抗或泊拉珠单抗的疗法)的复发性/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的人口统计学特征、临床特征和临床疗效。总共分析了175名R/R DLBCL患者,其中73人、69人和27人分别接受了CAR T疗法、基于泊拉珠单抗的疗法和基于他法西塔单抗的疗法。在既往接受过≥1线治疗的患者中(即开始接受二线或以后的治疗;2 L+),CAR T、基于泊拉珠单抗的方案和基于他法西他单抗的方案的中位总生存期分别为26.5个月、7.8个月和6.3个月。CAR T治疗后复发患者的疗效尤其差,这表明基于泊拉珠单抗和他法西他单抗的2 L + R/R DLBCL治疗方案在现实世界中的疗效并不理想。我们需要更多的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world outcomes with novel therapies in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

This study used COTA de-identified data (2010-2021) of patients in the US to explore outcomes of novel therapies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in real-world settings. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL who received novel treatments including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy and tafasitamab- or polatuzumab-based therapies were evaluated. Overall, 175 patients with R/R DLBCL were analyzed; 73, 69, and 27 received CAR T therapy, polatuzumab-based regimens, and tafasitamab-based regimens, respectively. In patients who had ≥1 prior lines of therapy (i.e. starting second-line or later therapy; 2 L+), CAR T, polatuzumab-based regimens, and tafasitamab-based regimens achieved a median overall survival of 26.5, 7.8, and 6.3 months, respectively. Outcomes were particularly poor for patients with relapse following CAR T, indicating that polatuzumab- and tafasitamab-based regimens in 2 L + R/R DLBCL have suboptimal outcomes in the real world. Additional treatment options are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Leukemia & Lymphoma 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
384
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信