Muhammad Aziz, Hossein Haghbin, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Azizullah Beran, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Hassam Ali, Amir Humza Sohail, Wade Lee-Smith, Syed Uzair Hamdani, Faisal Kamal, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"内窥镜镜下缝合系统治疗胃肠道缺陷的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Muhammad Aziz, Hossein Haghbin, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Azizullah Beran, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Hassam Ali, Amir Humza Sohail, Wade Lee-Smith, Syed Uzair Hamdani, Faisal Kamal, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently, a through-the-scope suturing (TTSS) system has received FDA approval and has been evaluated for closing mucosal defects postintervention. We hereby performed a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis of available studies to assess the safety and efficacy of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the following databases through April 26, 2023: Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Endoscopists utilizing TTSS for the following reasons were included: endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, perforation, fistula closure, and/or stent fixation. The outcomes assessed were technical success, primary clinical success (closure of defect without additional intervention), and overall clinical success (closure of defect with/without additional intervention). Random effects model with the DerSimonian Laird approach was used to report event rates expressed as proportions with a 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies with 512 patients (mean age of 61.5 ± 18.4 y, 54.6% females) were included. The technical success rate was 96.0% (CI: 94.3%-97.7%). The primary clinical success rate was 74.8% (CI: 65.5%-84.1%). The overall clinical success rate was 95.4% (CI: 92.6-98.2%). Only 1 mortality case unrelated to intervention was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TTSS appears safe and effective for closing mucosal defects after therapeutic endoscopic interventions. Further cost-effective studies should be performed comparing with endoclips for use in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Through-the-Scope Suture System for Gastrointestinal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Aziz, Hossein Haghbin, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Azizullah Beran, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Hassam Ali, Amir Humza Sohail, Wade Lee-Smith, Syed Uzair Hamdani, Faisal Kamal, Douglas G Adler\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently, a through-the-scope suturing (TTSS) system has received FDA approval and has been evaluated for closing mucosal defects postintervention. We hereby performed a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis of available studies to assess the safety and efficacy of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the following databases through April 26, 2023: Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Endoscopists utilizing TTSS for the following reasons were included: endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, perforation, fistula closure, and/or stent fixation. The outcomes assessed were technical success, primary clinical success (closure of defect without additional intervention), and overall clinical success (closure of defect with/without additional intervention). Random effects model with the DerSimonian Laird approach was used to report event rates expressed as proportions with a 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies with 512 patients (mean age of 61.5 ± 18.4 y, 54.6% females) were included. The technical success rate was 96.0% (CI: 94.3%-97.7%). The primary clinical success rate was 74.8% (CI: 65.5%-84.1%). The overall clinical success rate was 95.4% (CI: 92.6-98.2%). Only 1 mortality case unrelated to intervention was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TTSS appears safe and effective for closing mucosal defects after therapeutic endoscopic interventions. Further cost-effective studies should be performed comparing with endoclips for use in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:最近,一种镜下缝合(TTSS)系统获得了美国食品及药物管理局(FDA)的批准,并对干预后缝合粘膜缺损的效果进行了评估。在此,我们对现有研究进行了系统回顾和汇总荟萃分析,以评估这种干预方法的安全性和有效性:我们查询了截至 2023 年 4 月 26 日的以下数据库:方法:我们查询了截至 2023 年 4 月 26 日的以下数据库:Embase、MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Web of Science Core Collection。纳入了因以下原因使用 TTSS 的内镜医师:内镜下粘膜切除术、内镜下粘膜下剥离术、口周内镜下肌切开术、穿孔、瘘管闭合和/或支架固定术。评估的结果包括技术成功率、主要临床成功率(在无额外干预的情况下闭合缺损)和总体临床成功率(在有/无额外干预的情况下闭合缺损)。采用 DerSimonian Laird 方法建立随机效应模型,以比例和 95% CI 表示事件发生率:共有 12 项研究纳入了 512 名患者(平均年龄为 61.5 ± 18.4 岁,54.6% 为女性)。技术成功率为 96.0%(CI:94.3%-97.7%)。主要临床成功率为 74.8%(CI:65.5%-84.1%)。总体临床成功率为 95.4%(CI:92.6%-98.2%)。只有 1 例死亡病例与干预无关:结论:TTSS 用于治疗性内镜干预后的粘膜缺损闭合似乎安全有效。应进一步开展成本效益研究,将其与内镜夹进行比较,以便在临床环境中使用。
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Through-the-Scope Suture System for Gastrointestinal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Objective: Recently, a through-the-scope suturing (TTSS) system has received FDA approval and has been evaluated for closing mucosal defects postintervention. We hereby performed a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis of available studies to assess the safety and efficacy of this intervention.
Methods: We queried the following databases through April 26, 2023: Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Endoscopists utilizing TTSS for the following reasons were included: endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, perforation, fistula closure, and/or stent fixation. The outcomes assessed were technical success, primary clinical success (closure of defect without additional intervention), and overall clinical success (closure of defect with/without additional intervention). Random effects model with the DerSimonian Laird approach was used to report event rates expressed as proportions with a 95% CI.
Results: A total of 12 studies with 512 patients (mean age of 61.5 ± 18.4 y, 54.6% females) were included. The technical success rate was 96.0% (CI: 94.3%-97.7%). The primary clinical success rate was 74.8% (CI: 65.5%-84.1%). The overall clinical success rate was 95.4% (CI: 92.6-98.2%). Only 1 mortality case unrelated to intervention was reported.
Conclusion: The TTSS appears safe and effective for closing mucosal defects after therapeutic endoscopic interventions. Further cost-effective studies should be performed comparing with endoclips for use in clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.