脉冲场消融:胃电生理干预的另一种消融方法。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ashton Matthee, Zahra Aghababaie, Linley A Nisbet, Jarrah M Dowrick, John A Windsor, Gregory B Sands, Timothy R Angeli-Gordon
{"title":"脉冲场消融:胃电生理干预的另一种消融方法。","authors":"Ashton Matthee, Zahra Aghababaie, Linley A Nisbet, Jarrah M Dowrick, John A Windsor, Gregory B Sands, Timothy R Angeli-Gordon","doi":"10.1152/ajpgi.00124.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging ablative technology that has been used successfully to eliminate cardiac arrhythmias. As a nonthermal technique, it has significant benefits over traditional radiofrequency ablation with improved target tissue specificity and reduced risk of adverse events during cardiac applications. We investigated whether PFA is safe for use in the stomach and whether it could modulate gastric slow waves. Female weaner pigs were fasted overnight before anesthesia was induced using tiletamine hydrochloride (50 mg·mL<sup>-1</sup>) and zolazepam hydrochloride (50 mg·mL<sup>-1</sup>) and maintained with propofol (Diprivan 2%, 0.2-0.4 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>). Pulsed-field ablation was performed on their gastric serosa in vivo. Adjacent point lesions (<i>n</i> = 2-4) were used to create a linear injury using bipolar pulsed-field ablation consisting of 40 pulses (10 Hz frequency, 0.1 ms pulse width, 1,000 V amplitude). High-resolution electrical mapping defined baseline and postablation gastric slow-wave patterns. A validated five-point scale was used to evaluate tissue damage in hematoxylin and eosin-stained images. Results indicated that PFA successfully induced complete conduction blocks in all cases, with lesions through the entire thickness of the gastric muscle layers. Consistent postablation slow-wave patterns emerged immediately following ablation and persisted over the study period. Pulsed-field ablation induces rapid conduction blocks as a tool to modulate slow-wave patterns, indicating it may be suitable as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Results show that pulsed-field ablation can serve as a gastric slow-wave intervention by preventing slow-wave propagation across the lesion site. Stable conduction blocks were established immediately following energy delivery, faster than previous examples of radiofrequency gastric ablation. Pulsed-field ablation may be an alternative for gastric slow-wave intervention, and further functional and posthealing studies are now warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7725,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology","volume":" ","pages":"G456-G465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulsed-field ablation: an alternative ablative method for gastric electrophysiological intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Ashton Matthee, Zahra Aghababaie, Linley A Nisbet, Jarrah M Dowrick, John A Windsor, Gregory B Sands, Timothy R Angeli-Gordon\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/ajpgi.00124.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging ablative technology that has been used successfully to eliminate cardiac arrhythmias. As a nonthermal technique, it has significant benefits over traditional radiofrequency ablation with improved target tissue specificity and reduced risk of adverse events during cardiac applications. We investigated whether PFA is safe for use in the stomach and whether it could modulate gastric slow waves. Female weaner pigs were fasted overnight before anesthesia was induced using tiletamine hydrochloride (50 mg·mL<sup>-1</sup>) and zolazepam hydrochloride (50 mg·mL<sup>-1</sup>) and maintained with propofol (Diprivan 2%, 0.2-0.4 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>). Pulsed-field ablation was performed on their gastric serosa in vivo. Adjacent point lesions (<i>n</i> = 2-4) were used to create a linear injury using bipolar pulsed-field ablation consisting of 40 pulses (10 Hz frequency, 0.1 ms pulse width, 1,000 V amplitude). High-resolution electrical mapping defined baseline and postablation gastric slow-wave patterns. A validated five-point scale was used to evaluate tissue damage in hematoxylin and eosin-stained images. Results indicated that PFA successfully induced complete conduction blocks in all cases, with lesions through the entire thickness of the gastric muscle layers. Consistent postablation slow-wave patterns emerged immediately following ablation and persisted over the study period. Pulsed-field ablation induces rapid conduction blocks as a tool to modulate slow-wave patterns, indicating it may be suitable as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Results show that pulsed-field ablation can serve as a gastric slow-wave intervention by preventing slow-wave propagation across the lesion site. Stable conduction blocks were established immediately following energy delivery, faster than previous examples of radiofrequency gastric ablation. Pulsed-field ablation may be an alternative for gastric slow-wave intervention, and further functional and posthealing studies are now warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"G456-G465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00124.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00124.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种新兴的消融技术,已成功用于消除心律失常。作为一种非热技术,它与传统的射频消融相比具有显著优势,能提高靶组织的特异性,降低心脏应用过程中发生不良事件的风险。我们研究了在胃中使用 PFA 是否安全,以及它是否能调节胃慢波。在使用盐酸替他敏(50 毫克/毫升-1)和盐酸唑拉西泮(50 毫克/毫升-1)诱导麻醉并用丙泊酚(Diprivan 2%,0.2-0.4 毫克/千克-1 分钟-1)维持麻醉之前,先让雌性断奶猪禁食一夜。脉冲场消融术在其体内的胃浆膜上进行。相邻的点状病变(n=2-4)使用双极脉冲场消融术造成线性损伤,包括40个脉冲(频率10赫兹,脉宽0.1毫秒,振幅1000伏)。高分辨率电图确定了基线和消融后的胃慢波模式。在苏木精和伊红染色图像中,采用经过验证的五点量表来评估组织损伤。结果表明,PFA 在所有病例中都成功诱导了完全的传导阻滞,病变贯穿整个胃肌层厚度。消融后立即出现了一致的消融后慢波模式,并在研究期间持续存在。脉冲场消融可诱导快速传导阻滞,是调节慢波模式的一种工具,表明它可能适合作为射频消融的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulsed-field ablation: an alternative ablative method for gastric electrophysiological intervention.

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging ablative technology that has been used successfully to eliminate cardiac arrhythmias. As a nonthermal technique, it has significant benefits over traditional radiofrequency ablation with improved target tissue specificity and reduced risk of adverse events during cardiac applications. We investigated whether PFA is safe for use in the stomach and whether it could modulate gastric slow waves. Female weaner pigs were fasted overnight before anesthesia was induced using tiletamine hydrochloride (50 mg·mL-1) and zolazepam hydrochloride (50 mg·mL-1) and maintained with propofol (Diprivan 2%, 0.2-0.4 mg·kg-1·min-1). Pulsed-field ablation was performed on their gastric serosa in vivo. Adjacent point lesions (n = 2-4) were used to create a linear injury using bipolar pulsed-field ablation consisting of 40 pulses (10 Hz frequency, 0.1 ms pulse width, 1,000 V amplitude). High-resolution electrical mapping defined baseline and postablation gastric slow-wave patterns. A validated five-point scale was used to evaluate tissue damage in hematoxylin and eosin-stained images. Results indicated that PFA successfully induced complete conduction blocks in all cases, with lesions through the entire thickness of the gastric muscle layers. Consistent postablation slow-wave patterns emerged immediately following ablation and persisted over the study period. Pulsed-field ablation induces rapid conduction blocks as a tool to modulate slow-wave patterns, indicating it may be suitable as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Results show that pulsed-field ablation can serve as a gastric slow-wave intervention by preventing slow-wave propagation across the lesion site. Stable conduction blocks were established immediately following energy delivery, faster than previous examples of radiofrequency gastric ablation. Pulsed-field ablation may be an alternative for gastric slow-wave intervention, and further functional and posthealing studies are now warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology publishes original articles pertaining to all aspects of research involving normal or abnormal function of the gastrointestinal tract, hepatobiliary system, and pancreas. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts dealing with growth and development, digestion, secretion, absorption, metabolism, and motility relative to these organs, as well as research reports dealing with immune and inflammatory processes and with neural, endocrine, and circulatory control mechanisms that affect these organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信