{"title":"胸腔积液/血清癌胚抗原比值和胸腔积液/血清干扰素-γ比值在胸腔积液分类中的诊断价值。","authors":"Shu-Hui Liang, Cui Li, Si Xie","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing between different types of pleural effusions (PEs) is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels in PE and serum, as well as the PE/serum ratios of these markers, in classifying PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients with PE, categorizing them into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), and benign PE groups. Levels of CEA and IFN-γ in PE and serum were quantified and their ratios were calculated. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, focusing on the area under the curve (AUC) to determine the efficacy of these biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly elevated levels of CEA in PE and serum were observed in the MPE group compared to the benign and TPE groups, with the PE/serum CEA ratio offering substantial diagnostic value (AUCs: PE = 0.843, serum = 0.744). Conversely, IFN-γ levels in PE and serum were markedly higher in the TPE group, demonstrating notable diagnostic accuracy (AUCs: PE = 0.970, serum = 0.917).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CEA and IFN-γ demonstrate high clinical utility in differentiating between MPE and TPE. The PE/serum ratio of these biomarkers enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially facilitating earlier and more accurate therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"785-790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic value of pleural effusion/serum ratio of carcinoembryonic antigen and pleural effusion/serum ratio of interferon-γ in classification of pleural effusion.\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Hui Liang, Cui Li, Si Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/labmed/lmae050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing between different types of pleural effusions (PEs) is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels in PE and serum, as well as the PE/serum ratios of these markers, in classifying PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients with PE, categorizing them into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), and benign PE groups. Levels of CEA and IFN-γ in PE and serum were quantified and their ratios were calculated. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, focusing on the area under the curve (AUC) to determine the efficacy of these biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly elevated levels of CEA in PE and serum were observed in the MPE group compared to the benign and TPE groups, with the PE/serum CEA ratio offering substantial diagnostic value (AUCs: PE = 0.843, serum = 0.744). Conversely, IFN-γ levels in PE and serum were markedly higher in the TPE group, demonstrating notable diagnostic accuracy (AUCs: PE = 0.970, serum = 0.917).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CEA and IFN-γ demonstrate high clinical utility in differentiating between MPE and TPE. The PE/serum ratio of these biomarkers enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially facilitating earlier and more accurate therapeutic interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"785-790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:区分不同类型的胸腔积液(PE)对临床诊断和治疗至关重要。本研究评估了癌胚抗原(CEA)和干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)在胸腔积液和血清中的水平以及这些标记物的胸腔积液/血清比值在胸腔积液分类中的诊断价值:我们对 99 例 PE 患者进行了回顾性分析,将其分为恶性胸腔积液(MPE)、结核性胸腔积液(TPE)和良性 PE 组。对 PE 和血清中的 CEA 和 IFN-γ 水平进行量化,并计算其比率。使用接收器操作特征分析评估诊断性能,重点是曲线下面积(AUC),以确定这些生物标志物的功效:结果:与良性和 TPE 组相比,MPE 组 PE 和血清中的 CEA 水平显著升高,其中 PE/血清 CEA 比值具有很高的诊断价值(AUC:PE = 0.843,血清 = 0.744)。相反,TPE 组 PE 和血清中的 IFN-γ 水平明显更高,显示出显著的诊断准确性(AUCs:PE = 0.970,血清 = 0.917):结论:CEA 和 IFN-γ 在区分 MPE 和 TPE 方面具有很高的临床实用性。结论:CEA 和 IFN-γ 在区分 MPE 和 TPE 方面都显示出很高的临床实用性,这些生物标志物的 PE/血清比值提高了诊断的准确性,可能有助于更早、更准确地进行治疗干预。
The diagnostic value of pleural effusion/serum ratio of carcinoembryonic antigen and pleural effusion/serum ratio of interferon-γ in classification of pleural effusion.
Background: Distinguishing between different types of pleural effusions (PEs) is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels in PE and serum, as well as the PE/serum ratios of these markers, in classifying PE.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients with PE, categorizing them into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), and benign PE groups. Levels of CEA and IFN-γ in PE and serum were quantified and their ratios were calculated. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, focusing on the area under the curve (AUC) to determine the efficacy of these biomarkers.
Results: Significantly elevated levels of CEA in PE and serum were observed in the MPE group compared to the benign and TPE groups, with the PE/serum CEA ratio offering substantial diagnostic value (AUCs: PE = 0.843, serum = 0.744). Conversely, IFN-γ levels in PE and serum were markedly higher in the TPE group, demonstrating notable diagnostic accuracy (AUCs: PE = 0.970, serum = 0.917).
Conclusion: Both CEA and IFN-γ demonstrate high clinical utility in differentiating between MPE and TPE. The PE/serum ratio of these biomarkers enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially facilitating earlier and more accurate therapeutic interventions.