胸腔积液/血清癌胚抗原比值和胸腔积液/血清干扰素-γ比值在胸腔积液分类中的诊断价值。

Shu-Hui Liang, Cui Li, Si Xie
{"title":"胸腔积液/血清癌胚抗原比值和胸腔积液/血清干扰素-γ比值在胸腔积液分类中的诊断价值。","authors":"Shu-Hui Liang, Cui Li, Si Xie","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing between different types of pleural effusions (PEs) is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels in PE and serum, as well as the PE/serum ratios of these markers, in classifying PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients with PE, categorizing them into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), and benign PE groups. Levels of CEA and IFN-γ in PE and serum were quantified and their ratios were calculated. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, focusing on the area under the curve (AUC) to determine the efficacy of these biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly elevated levels of CEA in PE and serum were observed in the MPE group compared to the benign and TPE groups, with the PE/serum CEA ratio offering substantial diagnostic value (AUCs: PE = 0.843, serum = 0.744). Conversely, IFN-γ levels in PE and serum were markedly higher in the TPE group, demonstrating notable diagnostic accuracy (AUCs: PE = 0.970, serum = 0.917).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CEA and IFN-γ demonstrate high clinical utility in differentiating between MPE and TPE. The PE/serum ratio of these biomarkers enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially facilitating earlier and more accurate therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"785-790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic value of pleural effusion/serum ratio of carcinoembryonic antigen and pleural effusion/serum ratio of interferon-γ in classification of pleural effusion.\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Hui Liang, Cui Li, Si Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/labmed/lmae050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing between different types of pleural effusions (PEs) is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels in PE and serum, as well as the PE/serum ratios of these markers, in classifying PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients with PE, categorizing them into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), and benign PE groups. Levels of CEA and IFN-γ in PE and serum were quantified and their ratios were calculated. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, focusing on the area under the curve (AUC) to determine the efficacy of these biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly elevated levels of CEA in PE and serum were observed in the MPE group compared to the benign and TPE groups, with the PE/serum CEA ratio offering substantial diagnostic value (AUCs: PE = 0.843, serum = 0.744). Conversely, IFN-γ levels in PE and serum were markedly higher in the TPE group, demonstrating notable diagnostic accuracy (AUCs: PE = 0.970, serum = 0.917).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CEA and IFN-γ demonstrate high clinical utility in differentiating between MPE and TPE. The PE/serum ratio of these biomarkers enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially facilitating earlier and more accurate therapeutic interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"785-790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:区分不同类型的胸腔积液(PE)对临床诊断和治疗至关重要。本研究评估了癌胚抗原(CEA)和干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)在胸腔积液和血清中的水平以及这些标记物的胸腔积液/血清比值在胸腔积液分类中的诊断价值:我们对 99 例 PE 患者进行了回顾性分析,将其分为恶性胸腔积液(MPE)、结核性胸腔积液(TPE)和良性 PE 组。对 PE 和血清中的 CEA 和 IFN-γ 水平进行量化,并计算其比率。使用接收器操作特征分析评估诊断性能,重点是曲线下面积(AUC),以确定这些生物标志物的功效:结果:与良性和 TPE 组相比,MPE 组 PE 和血清中的 CEA 水平显著升高,其中 PE/血清 CEA 比值具有很高的诊断价值(AUC:PE = 0.843,血清 = 0.744)。相反,TPE 组 PE 和血清中的 IFN-γ 水平明显更高,显示出显著的诊断准确性(AUCs:PE = 0.970,血清 = 0.917):结论:CEA 和 IFN-γ 在区分 MPE 和 TPE 方面具有很高的临床实用性。结论:CEA 和 IFN-γ 在区分 MPE 和 TPE 方面都显示出很高的临床实用性,这些生物标志物的 PE/血清比值提高了诊断的准确性,可能有助于更早、更准确地进行治疗干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The diagnostic value of pleural effusion/serum ratio of carcinoembryonic antigen and pleural effusion/serum ratio of interferon-γ in classification of pleural effusion.

Background: Distinguishing between different types of pleural effusions (PEs) is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels in PE and serum, as well as the PE/serum ratios of these markers, in classifying PE.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients with PE, categorizing them into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), and benign PE groups. Levels of CEA and IFN-γ in PE and serum were quantified and their ratios were calculated. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, focusing on the area under the curve (AUC) to determine the efficacy of these biomarkers.

Results: Significantly elevated levels of CEA in PE and serum were observed in the MPE group compared to the benign and TPE groups, with the PE/serum CEA ratio offering substantial diagnostic value (AUCs: PE = 0.843, serum = 0.744). Conversely, IFN-γ levels in PE and serum were markedly higher in the TPE group, demonstrating notable diagnostic accuracy (AUCs: PE = 0.970, serum = 0.917).

Conclusion: Both CEA and IFN-γ demonstrate high clinical utility in differentiating between MPE and TPE. The PE/serum ratio of these biomarkers enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially facilitating earlier and more accurate therapeutic interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信