Inés Borrego Soriano, Beatriz Barquiel Alcalá, Óscar Moreno Domínguez, Ana Laila Qasem Moreno, Elena García Pérez de Sevilla, Noemí González Pérez de Villar
{"title":"一家三级医院用于检测未知或控制不佳糖尿病的筛查系统:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Inés Borrego Soriano, Beatriz Barquiel Alcalá, Óscar Moreno Domínguez, Ana Laila Qasem Moreno, Elena García Pérez de Sevilla, Noemí González Pérez de Villar","doi":"10.1111/jep.14098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Hospitalization may be a valuable chance for the detection of unknown and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM). There is a screening tool at our hospital: in case of high inpatient plasma glucose level, an A1c value is added if no available from the last 3 months.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>Our objective was to analyse the population with A1c ≥ 9% detected through this system from 2021 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed. Three thousand five hundred seventy-two patients were screened. We studied 243 patients with A1c ≥ 9%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourty-eight patients (19.8%) had unknown DM. The Endocrinology department was consulted in 39 cases (16%). In most of the cases (51%), there was not a mention in the discharge report, nor changes in the usual treatment (65.4%). Ninety patients (37%) improved A1c. Most of the ones that improved (58.9%) had a correct follow-up, compared with those who did not (23.5%) (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measurement of A1c during hospitalization can help us to diagnose unknown or poorly controlled DM. Therapeutic inertia and delayed diagnosis are two problems associated to DM that are confirmed by our data.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening system for the detection of unknown or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus in a tertiary hospital: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Inés Borrego Soriano, Beatriz Barquiel Alcalá, Óscar Moreno Domínguez, Ana Laila Qasem Moreno, Elena García Pérez de Sevilla, Noemí González Pérez de Villar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Hospitalization may be a valuable chance for the detection of unknown and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM). There is a screening tool at our hospital: in case of high inpatient plasma glucose level, an A1c value is added if no available from the last 3 months.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>Our objective was to analyse the population with A1c ≥ 9% detected through this system from 2021 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed. Three thousand five hundred seventy-two patients were screened. We studied 243 patients with A1c ≥ 9%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourty-eight patients (19.8%) had unknown DM. The Endocrinology department was consulted in 39 cases (16%). In most of the cases (51%), there was not a mention in the discharge report, nor changes in the usual treatment (65.4%). Ninety patients (37%) improved A1c. Most of the ones that improved (58.9%) had a correct follow-up, compared with those who did not (23.5%) (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measurement of A1c during hospitalization can help us to diagnose unknown or poorly controlled DM. Therapeutic inertia and delayed diagnosis are two problems associated to DM that are confirmed by our data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14098\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Screening system for the detection of unknown or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus in a tertiary hospital: A retrospective study.
Rationale: Hospitalization may be a valuable chance for the detection of unknown and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM). There is a screening tool at our hospital: in case of high inpatient plasma glucose level, an A1c value is added if no available from the last 3 months.
Aims and objectives: Our objective was to analyse the population with A1c ≥ 9% detected through this system from 2021 to 2023.
Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed. Three thousand five hundred seventy-two patients were screened. We studied 243 patients with A1c ≥ 9%.
Results: Fourty-eight patients (19.8%) had unknown DM. The Endocrinology department was consulted in 39 cases (16%). In most of the cases (51%), there was not a mention in the discharge report, nor changes in the usual treatment (65.4%). Ninety patients (37%) improved A1c. Most of the ones that improved (58.9%) had a correct follow-up, compared with those who did not (23.5%) (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Measurement of A1c during hospitalization can help us to diagnose unknown or poorly controlled DM. Therapeutic inertia and delayed diagnosis are two problems associated to DM that are confirmed by our data.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.