确立肿瘤坏死作为结直肠癌预后指标的标准

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
American Journal of Surgical Pathology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1097/PAS.0000000000002286
Meeri Kastinen, Päivi Sirniö, Hanna Elomaa, Ville K Äijälä, Henna Karjalainen, Vilja V Tapiainen, Vesa-Matti Pohjanen, Janette Kemppainen, Katja Sliashynskaya, Maarit Ahtiainen, Jukka Rintala, Sanna Meriläinen, Tero Rautio, Juha Saarnio, Taneli T Mattila, Outi Lindgren, Erkki-Ville Wirta, Olli Helminen, Toni T Seppälä, Jan Böhm, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Anne Tuomisto, Markus J Mäkinen, Juha P Väyrynen
{"title":"确立肿瘤坏死作为结直肠癌预后指标的标准","authors":"Meeri Kastinen, Päivi Sirniö, Hanna Elomaa, Ville K Äijälä, Henna Karjalainen, Vilja V Tapiainen, Vesa-Matti Pohjanen, Janette Kemppainen, Katja Sliashynskaya, Maarit Ahtiainen, Jukka Rintala, Sanna Meriläinen, Tero Rautio, Juha Saarnio, Taneli T Mattila, Outi Lindgren, Erkki-Ville Wirta, Olli Helminen, Toni T Seppälä, Jan Böhm, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Anne Tuomisto, Markus J Mäkinen, Juha P Väyrynen","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumor necrosis has been reported to represent an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, but its evaluation methods have not been described in sufficient detail to introduce tumor necrosis evaluation into clinical use. To study the potential of tumor necrosis as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer, criteria for 3 methods for its evaluation were defined: the average percentage method (tumor necrosis percentage of the whole tumor), the hotspot method (tumor necrosis percentage in a single hotspot), and the linear method (the diameter of the single largest necrotic focus). Cox regression models were used to calculate cancer-specific mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for tumor necrosis categories in 2 colorectal cancer cohorts with more than 1800 cases. For reproducibility assessment, 30 cases were evaluated by 9 investigators, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated. We found that all 3 methods predicted colorectal cancer-specific survival independent of other prognostic parameters, including disease stage, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor budding. The greatest multivariable HRs were observed for the average percentage method (cohort 1: HR for ≥ 40% vs. <3% 3.03, 95% CI, 1.93-4.78; cohort 2: HR for ≥ 40% vs. < 3% 2.97; 95% CI, 1.63-5.40). All 3 methods had high reproducibility, with the linear method showing the highest mean Spearman's correlation coefficient (0.91) and Cohen's kappa (0.70). In conclusion, detailed criteria for tumor necrosis evaluation were established. All 3 methods showed good reproducibility and predictive ability. The findings pave the way for the use of tumor necrosis as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7772,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1284-1292"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11404753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing Criteria for Tumor Necrosis as Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Meeri Kastinen, Päivi Sirniö, Hanna Elomaa, Ville K Äijälä, Henna Karjalainen, Vilja V Tapiainen, Vesa-Matti Pohjanen, Janette Kemppainen, Katja Sliashynskaya, Maarit Ahtiainen, Jukka Rintala, Sanna Meriläinen, Tero Rautio, Juha Saarnio, Taneli T Mattila, Outi Lindgren, Erkki-Ville Wirta, Olli Helminen, Toni T Seppälä, Jan Böhm, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Anne Tuomisto, Markus J Mäkinen, Juha P Väyrynen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tumor necrosis has been reported to represent an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, but its evaluation methods have not been described in sufficient detail to introduce tumor necrosis evaluation into clinical use. To study the potential of tumor necrosis as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer, criteria for 3 methods for its evaluation were defined: the average percentage method (tumor necrosis percentage of the whole tumor), the hotspot method (tumor necrosis percentage in a single hotspot), and the linear method (the diameter of the single largest necrotic focus). Cox regression models were used to calculate cancer-specific mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for tumor necrosis categories in 2 colorectal cancer cohorts with more than 1800 cases. For reproducibility assessment, 30 cases were evaluated by 9 investigators, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated. We found that all 3 methods predicted colorectal cancer-specific survival independent of other prognostic parameters, including disease stage, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor budding. The greatest multivariable HRs were observed for the average percentage method (cohort 1: HR for ≥ 40% vs. <3% 3.03, 95% CI, 1.93-4.78; cohort 2: HR for ≥ 40% vs. < 3% 2.97; 95% CI, 1.63-5.40). All 3 methods had high reproducibility, with the linear method showing the highest mean Spearman's correlation coefficient (0.91) and Cohen's kappa (0.70). In conclusion, detailed criteria for tumor necrosis evaluation were established. All 3 methods showed good reproducibility and predictive ability. The findings pave the way for the use of tumor necrosis as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1284-1292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11404753/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002286\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002286","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,肿瘤坏死是结直肠癌的一个独立预后因素,但其评估方法尚未得到足够详细的描述,因此无法将肿瘤坏死评估引入临床应用。为了研究肿瘤坏死作为结直肠癌预后指标的潜力,我们定义了三种肿瘤坏死评估方法的标准:平均百分比法(整个肿瘤的肿瘤坏死百分比)、热点法(单个热点的肿瘤坏死百分比)和线性法(单个最大坏死灶的直径)。在超过 1800 例病例的两个结直肠癌队列中,采用 Cox 回归模型计算肿瘤坏死类别的癌症特异性死亡率危险比 (HR)。为了评估可重复性,9 位研究者对 30 个病例进行了评估,并计算了斯皮尔曼等级相关系数和科恩卡帕系数。我们发现,这三种方法都能预测结直肠癌特异性生存率,而不受疾病分期、淋巴管侵犯和肿瘤出芽等其他预后参数的影响。平均百分比法的多变量 HR 最大(队列 1:≥ 40% 的 HR vs. ≥ 40% 的 HR)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing Criteria for Tumor Necrosis as Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Cancer.

Tumor necrosis has been reported to represent an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, but its evaluation methods have not been described in sufficient detail to introduce tumor necrosis evaluation into clinical use. To study the potential of tumor necrosis as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer, criteria for 3 methods for its evaluation were defined: the average percentage method (tumor necrosis percentage of the whole tumor), the hotspot method (tumor necrosis percentage in a single hotspot), and the linear method (the diameter of the single largest necrotic focus). Cox regression models were used to calculate cancer-specific mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for tumor necrosis categories in 2 colorectal cancer cohorts with more than 1800 cases. For reproducibility assessment, 30 cases were evaluated by 9 investigators, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated. We found that all 3 methods predicted colorectal cancer-specific survival independent of other prognostic parameters, including disease stage, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor budding. The greatest multivariable HRs were observed for the average percentage method (cohort 1: HR for ≥ 40% vs. <3% 3.03, 95% CI, 1.93-4.78; cohort 2: HR for ≥ 40% vs. < 3% 2.97; 95% CI, 1.63-5.40). All 3 methods had high reproducibility, with the linear method showing the highest mean Spearman's correlation coefficient (0.91) and Cohen's kappa (0.70). In conclusion, detailed criteria for tumor necrosis evaluation were established. All 3 methods showed good reproducibility and predictive ability. The findings pave the way for the use of tumor necrosis as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgical Pathology has achieved worldwide recognition for its outstanding coverage of the state of the art in human surgical pathology. In each monthly issue, experts present original articles, review articles, detailed case reports, and special features, enhanced by superb illustrations. Coverage encompasses technical methods, diagnostic aids, and frozen-section diagnosis, in addition to detailed pathologic studies of a wide range of disease entities. Official Journal of The Arthur Purdy Stout Society of Surgical Pathologists and The Gastrointestinal Pathology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信