CatScore:评估高效不对称催化剂设计

IF 6.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bing Yan and Kyunghyun Cho
{"title":"CatScore:评估高效不对称催化剂设计","authors":"Bing Yan and Kyunghyun Cho","doi":"10.1039/D4DD00114A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Asymmetric catalysis plays a crucial role in advancing medicine and materials science. However, the prevailing experiment-driven methods for catalyst evaluation are both resource-heavy and time-consuming. To address this challenge, we present CatScore – a learning-centric metric designed for the automatic evaluation of catalyst design models at both instance and system levels. This approach harnesses the power of deep learning to predict product selectivity as a function of reactants and the proposed catalyst. The predicted selectivity serves as a quantitative score, enabling a swift and precise assessment of a catalyst's activity. On an instance level, CatScore's predictions correlate closely with experimental outcomes, demonstrating a Spearman's <em>ρ</em> = 0.84, which surpasses the density functional theory (DFT) based linear free energy relationships (LFERs) metric with <em>ρ</em> = 0.55 and round-trip accuracy metrics at <em>ρ</em> = 0.24. Importantly, when ranking catalyst candidates, CatScore achieves a mean reciprocal ranking significantly superior to traditional LFER methods, marking a considerable reduction in labor and time investments needed to find top-performing catalysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":72816,"journal":{"name":"Digital discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/dd/d4dd00114a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CatScore: evaluating asymmetric catalyst design at high efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Bing Yan and Kyunghyun Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4DD00114A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Asymmetric catalysis plays a crucial role in advancing medicine and materials science. However, the prevailing experiment-driven methods for catalyst evaluation are both resource-heavy and time-consuming. To address this challenge, we present CatScore – a learning-centric metric designed for the automatic evaluation of catalyst design models at both instance and system levels. This approach harnesses the power of deep learning to predict product selectivity as a function of reactants and the proposed catalyst. The predicted selectivity serves as a quantitative score, enabling a swift and precise assessment of a catalyst's activity. On an instance level, CatScore's predictions correlate closely with experimental outcomes, demonstrating a Spearman's <em>ρ</em> = 0.84, which surpasses the density functional theory (DFT) based linear free energy relationships (LFERs) metric with <em>ρ</em> = 0.55 and round-trip accuracy metrics at <em>ρ</em> = 0.24. Importantly, when ranking catalyst candidates, CatScore achieves a mean reciprocal ranking significantly superior to traditional LFER methods, marking a considerable reduction in labor and time investments needed to find top-performing catalysts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital discovery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/dd/d4dd00114a?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/dd/d4dd00114a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/dd/d4dd00114a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不对称催化在推动医学和材料科学发展方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,目前用于催化剂评估的实验驱动方法既耗费资源又耗费时间。为了应对这一挑战,我们提出了 CatScore--一种以学习为中心的度量方法,设计用于在实例和系统层面自动评估催化剂设计模型。这种方法利用深度学习的强大功能,将产物选择性作为反应物和拟议催化剂的函数进行预测。预测的选择性可作为量化评分,从而对催化剂的活性进行快速、精确的评估。在实例层面上,CatScore 的预测与实验结果密切相关,显示出 Spearman's ρ = 0.84,超过了密度泛函理论(DFT)的 ρ = 0.54 和往返精度指标 ρ = 0.24。重要的是,在对候选催化剂进行排名时,CatScore 的平均倒数排名明显优于传统的 DFT 方法,大大减少了寻找性能最佳催化剂所需的人力和时间投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

CatScore: evaluating asymmetric catalyst design at high efficiency

CatScore: evaluating asymmetric catalyst design at high efficiency

Asymmetric catalysis plays a crucial role in advancing medicine and materials science. However, the prevailing experiment-driven methods for catalyst evaluation are both resource-heavy and time-consuming. To address this challenge, we present CatScore – a learning-centric metric designed for the automatic evaluation of catalyst design models at both instance and system levels. This approach harnesses the power of deep learning to predict product selectivity as a function of reactants and the proposed catalyst. The predicted selectivity serves as a quantitative score, enabling a swift and precise assessment of a catalyst's activity. On an instance level, CatScore's predictions correlate closely with experimental outcomes, demonstrating a Spearman's ρ = 0.84, which surpasses the density functional theory (DFT) based linear free energy relationships (LFERs) metric with ρ = 0.55 and round-trip accuracy metrics at ρ = 0.24. Importantly, when ranking catalyst candidates, CatScore achieves a mean reciprocal ranking significantly superior to traditional LFER methods, marking a considerable reduction in labor and time investments needed to find top-performing catalysts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信