根据鱼片、鱼头和下颚长度测量结果估算的黄鲈鱼长度

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES
Carey T. Knight, Graham F. Montague, Daniel E. Shoup
{"title":"根据鱼片、鱼头和下颚长度测量结果估算的黄鲈鱼长度","authors":"Carey T. Knight, Graham F. Montague, Daniel E. Shoup","doi":"10.1002/nafm.11023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveYellow Perch <jats:italic>Perca flavescens</jats:italic> are popular sport fish; however, obtaining adequate length data can be problematic during low‐abundance years. Using fish from the sport fishery cleaning stations provides a possible source of data, but fish from this source have already been filleted, making length data questionable, and may not have intact backbones, so lengths cannot be determined. Therefore, we tested if Yellow Perch total length measured from filleted fish are similar to the total length measured before filleting and we also developed regression equations to predict total length from filleted fish length, head length, or mandible lengths and compared their accuracy to known total lengths.MethodsYellow Perch were collected from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources standardized bottom trawl survey. Each fish was measured for total length using a measuring board, and head and mandible lengths were measured with digital calipers. A subset of fish (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 46) was filleted, and total length was again measured to see if filleting altered length measurements. We used linear regression with 10‐fold cross validation to estimate the total length of Yellow Perch from filleted fish length, head length, and mandible length.ResultOur results show that all three measurements were good predictors (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> &gt; 0.98) of fish total length, with precision being greatest for filleted length, followed by head length (mandible length had notably lower precision). Filleted fish lengths were significantly longer than intact total length, but we provide a regression equation that can be used to estimate unfilleted length using filleted fish length.ConclusionWe recommend estimating total length from filleted length regression or head length regression in cases when total length cannot be directly measured. Our mandible length regression can also be used, but it was slightly less precise than the head length regression, which should be used instead when practical.","PeriodicalId":19263,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","volume":"328 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yellow Perch length estimated from filleted, head, and mandible length measurements\",\"authors\":\"Carey T. Knight, Graham F. Montague, Daniel E. Shoup\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nafm.11023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveYellow Perch <jats:italic>Perca flavescens</jats:italic> are popular sport fish; however, obtaining adequate length data can be problematic during low‐abundance years. Using fish from the sport fishery cleaning stations provides a possible source of data, but fish from this source have already been filleted, making length data questionable, and may not have intact backbones, so lengths cannot be determined. Therefore, we tested if Yellow Perch total length measured from filleted fish are similar to the total length measured before filleting and we also developed regression equations to predict total length from filleted fish length, head length, or mandible lengths and compared their accuracy to known total lengths.MethodsYellow Perch were collected from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources standardized bottom trawl survey. Each fish was measured for total length using a measuring board, and head and mandible lengths were measured with digital calipers. A subset of fish (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 46) was filleted, and total length was again measured to see if filleting altered length measurements. We used linear regression with 10‐fold cross validation to estimate the total length of Yellow Perch from filleted fish length, head length, and mandible length.ResultOur results show that all three measurements were good predictors (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> &gt; 0.98) of fish total length, with precision being greatest for filleted length, followed by head length (mandible length had notably lower precision). Filleted fish lengths were significantly longer than intact total length, but we provide a regression equation that can be used to estimate unfilleted length using filleted fish length.ConclusionWe recommend estimating total length from filleted length regression or head length regression in cases when total length cannot be directly measured. Our mandible length regression can also be used, but it was slightly less precise than the head length regression, which should be used instead when practical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Journal of Fisheries Management\",\"volume\":\"328 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Journal of Fisheries Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.11023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.11023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标黄鲈(Perca flavescens)是很受欢迎的运动鱼类;但是,在鱼量较少的年份,要获得足够的长度数据可能会很困难。使用来自体育渔业清洁站的鱼提供了一个可能的数据来源,但来自这一来源的鱼已经被切片,使得长度数据值得怀疑,而且可能没有完整的背骨,因此无法确定长度。因此,我们测试了从切片鱼中测量出的黄鲈总长度是否与切片前测量出的总长度相似,我们还开发了回归方程来预测切片鱼的总长度、头长或下颚长,并将其准确性与已知总长度进行比较。用测量板测量每条鱼的总长度,用数字卡尺测量头长和下颌长。将一部分鱼(N = 46)切片,再次测量总长度,以确定切片是否会改变长度测量结果。我们采用线性回归和 10 倍交叉验证的方法,根据鱼片长度、鱼头长度和下颌长度估算黄鲈的总长度。结果表明,所有三种测量值都能很好地预测鱼的总长度(R2 > 0.98),鱼片长度的精确度最高,其次是鱼头长度(下颌长度的精确度明显较低)。鱼片长度明显长于完整的总长度,但我们提供了一个回归方程,可用于利用鱼片长度估计鱼头长度。我们的下颌骨长度回归法也可以使用,但其精确度略低于头长回归法,在实际情况下应改用头长回归法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Yellow Perch length estimated from filleted, head, and mandible length measurements
ObjectiveYellow Perch Perca flavescens are popular sport fish; however, obtaining adequate length data can be problematic during low‐abundance years. Using fish from the sport fishery cleaning stations provides a possible source of data, but fish from this source have already been filleted, making length data questionable, and may not have intact backbones, so lengths cannot be determined. Therefore, we tested if Yellow Perch total length measured from filleted fish are similar to the total length measured before filleting and we also developed regression equations to predict total length from filleted fish length, head length, or mandible lengths and compared their accuracy to known total lengths.MethodsYellow Perch were collected from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources standardized bottom trawl survey. Each fish was measured for total length using a measuring board, and head and mandible lengths were measured with digital calipers. A subset of fish (N = 46) was filleted, and total length was again measured to see if filleting altered length measurements. We used linear regression with 10‐fold cross validation to estimate the total length of Yellow Perch from filleted fish length, head length, and mandible length.ResultOur results show that all three measurements were good predictors (R2 > 0.98) of fish total length, with precision being greatest for filleted length, followed by head length (mandible length had notably lower precision). Filleted fish lengths were significantly longer than intact total length, but we provide a regression equation that can be used to estimate unfilleted length using filleted fish length.ConclusionWe recommend estimating total length from filleted length regression or head length regression in cases when total length cannot be directly measured. Our mandible length regression can also be used, but it was slightly less precise than the head length regression, which should be used instead when practical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
118
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The North American Journal of Fisheries Management promotes communication among fishery managers with an emphasis on North America, and addresses the maintenance, enhancement, and allocation of fisheries resources. It chronicles the development of practical monitoring and management programs for finfish and exploitable shellfish in marine and freshwater environments. Contributions relate to the management of fish populations, habitats, and users to protect and enhance fish and fishery resources for societal benefits. Case histories of successes, failures, and effects of fisheries programs help convey practical management experience to others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信