使用泰勒近似梯度改进经验风险最小化的弗兰克-沃尔夫方法

IF 2.6 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Zikai Xiong, Robert M. Freund
{"title":"使用泰勒近似梯度改进经验风险最小化的弗兰克-沃尔夫方法","authors":"Zikai Xiong, Robert M. Freund","doi":"10.1137/22m1519286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM Journal on Optimization, Volume 34, Issue 3, Page 2503-2534, September 2024. <br/> Abstract. The Frank–Wolfe method has become increasingly useful in statistical and machine learning applications due to the structure-inducing properties of the iterates and especially in settings where linear minimization over the feasible set is more computationally efficient than projection. In the setting of empirical risk minimization—one of the fundamental optimization problems in statistical and machine learning—the computational effectiveness of Frank–Wolfe methods typically grows linearly in the number of data observations [math]. This is in stark contrast to the case for typical stochastic projection methods. In order to reduce this dependence on [math], we look to second-order smoothness of typical smooth loss functions (least squares loss and logistic loss, for example), and we propose amending the Frank–Wolfe method with Taylor series–approximated gradients, including variants for both deterministic and stochastic settings. Compared with current state-of-the-art methods in the regime where the optimality tolerance [math] is sufficiently small, our methods are able to simultaneously reduce the dependence on large [math] while obtaining optimal convergence rates of Frank–Wolfe methods in both convex and nonconvex settings. We also propose a novel adaptive step-size approach for which we have computational guarantees. Finally, we present computational experiments which show that our methods exhibit very significant speedups over existing methods on real-world datasets for both convex and nonconvex binary classification problems.","PeriodicalId":49529,"journal":{"name":"SIAM Journal on Optimization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Taylor-Approximated Gradients to Improve the Frank–Wolfe Method for Empirical Risk Minimization\",\"authors\":\"Zikai Xiong, Robert M. Freund\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/22m1519286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SIAM Journal on Optimization, Volume 34, Issue 3, Page 2503-2534, September 2024. <br/> Abstract. The Frank–Wolfe method has become increasingly useful in statistical and machine learning applications due to the structure-inducing properties of the iterates and especially in settings where linear minimization over the feasible set is more computationally efficient than projection. In the setting of empirical risk minimization—one of the fundamental optimization problems in statistical and machine learning—the computational effectiveness of Frank–Wolfe methods typically grows linearly in the number of data observations [math]. This is in stark contrast to the case for typical stochastic projection methods. In order to reduce this dependence on [math], we look to second-order smoothness of typical smooth loss functions (least squares loss and logistic loss, for example), and we propose amending the Frank–Wolfe method with Taylor series–approximated gradients, including variants for both deterministic and stochastic settings. Compared with current state-of-the-art methods in the regime where the optimality tolerance [math] is sufficiently small, our methods are able to simultaneously reduce the dependence on large [math] while obtaining optimal convergence rates of Frank–Wolfe methods in both convex and nonconvex settings. We also propose a novel adaptive step-size approach for which we have computational guarantees. Finally, we present computational experiments which show that our methods exhibit very significant speedups over existing methods on real-world datasets for both convex and nonconvex binary classification problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIAM Journal on Optimization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIAM Journal on Optimization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/22m1519286\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM Journal on Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/22m1519286","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SIAM 优化期刊》,第 34 卷第 3 期,第 2503-2534 页,2024 年 9 月。 摘要由于迭代的结构诱导特性,特别是在可行集上的线性最小化比投影更有效计算的情况下,Frank-Wolfe 方法在统计和机器学习应用中变得越来越有用。在经验风险最小化--统计和机器学习领域的基本优化问题之一--的环境中,Frank-Wolfe 方法的计算效率通常与数据观测的数量成线性增长[数学]。这与典型的随机投影方法形成了鲜明对比。为了降低对[math]的依赖性,我们研究了典型平滑损失函数(例如最小二乘损失和逻辑损失)的二阶平滑性,并提出用泰勒级数近似梯度修正弗兰克-沃尔夫方法,包括确定性和随机设置的变体。在优化容限[math]足够小的情况下,与当前最先进的方法相比,我们的方法能够同时降低对大[math]的依赖,同时在凸和非凸环境下获得最佳的弗兰克-沃尔夫方法收敛率。我们还提出了一种新颖的自适应步长方法,并为其提供了计算保证。最后,我们介绍了计算实验,实验结果表明,在现实世界的数据集上,我们的方法在凸和非凸二元分类问题上都比现有方法有非常显著的提速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Taylor-Approximated Gradients to Improve the Frank–Wolfe Method for Empirical Risk Minimization
SIAM Journal on Optimization, Volume 34, Issue 3, Page 2503-2534, September 2024.
Abstract. The Frank–Wolfe method has become increasingly useful in statistical and machine learning applications due to the structure-inducing properties of the iterates and especially in settings where linear minimization over the feasible set is more computationally efficient than projection. In the setting of empirical risk minimization—one of the fundamental optimization problems in statistical and machine learning—the computational effectiveness of Frank–Wolfe methods typically grows linearly in the number of data observations [math]. This is in stark contrast to the case for typical stochastic projection methods. In order to reduce this dependence on [math], we look to second-order smoothness of typical smooth loss functions (least squares loss and logistic loss, for example), and we propose amending the Frank–Wolfe method with Taylor series–approximated gradients, including variants for both deterministic and stochastic settings. Compared with current state-of-the-art methods in the regime where the optimality tolerance [math] is sufficiently small, our methods are able to simultaneously reduce the dependence on large [math] while obtaining optimal convergence rates of Frank–Wolfe methods in both convex and nonconvex settings. We also propose a novel adaptive step-size approach for which we have computational guarantees. Finally, we present computational experiments which show that our methods exhibit very significant speedups over existing methods on real-world datasets for both convex and nonconvex binary classification problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SIAM Journal on Optimization
SIAM Journal on Optimization 数学-应用数学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The SIAM Journal on Optimization contains research articles on the theory and practice of optimization. The areas addressed include linear and quadratic programming, convex programming, nonlinear programming, complementarity problems, stochastic optimization, combinatorial optimization, integer programming, and convex, nonsmooth and variational analysis. Contributions may emphasize optimization theory, algorithms, software, computational practice, applications, or the links between these subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信