对异源 Fontan 注册数据进行主成分分析,找出导致衰退的独立因素

Margaret Ferrari, Michal Schafer, Kendall Hunter, Michael DiMaria
{"title":"对异源 Fontan 注册数据进行主成分分析,找出导致衰退的独立因素","authors":"Margaret Ferrari, Michal Schafer, Kendall Hunter, Michael DiMaria","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.11.24310309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single ventricle heart disease is a severe and life-threatening illness, and improvements in clinical outcomes of those with Fontan circulation have not yet yielded acceptable survival over the past two decades. Patients are at risk of developing a diverse variety of Fontan-associated comorbidities that ultimately requires heart transplant. Our study goal was to determine if principal component analysis (PCA) applied to data collected from a substantial Fontan cohort can predict functional decline (N=140). Heterogeneous data broadly consisting of measures of cardiac and vascular function, exercise (VO2max), lymphatic biomarkers, and blood biomarkers were collected over 11 years at a single site; in that time, 16 events occurred that are considered here in a composite outcome measure. After standardization and PCA, principal components (PCs) representing >5% of total variance were thematically labeled based on their constituents and tested for association with the composite outcome. Our main findings suggest that the 6th PC (PC6), representing 7.1% percent of the total variance in the set, is greatly influenced by blood serum biomarkers and superior vena cava flow, is a superior measure of proportional hazard compared to EF, and displayed the greatest accuracy for classifying Fontan patients as determined by AUC. In bivariate hazard analysis, we found that models combining systolic function (EF or PC5) and lymphatic dysfunction (PC6) were most predictive, with the former having the greatest AIC, and the latter having the highest c-statistic. Our findings support our hypothesis that a multifactorial model must be considered to improve prognosis in the Fontan population.","PeriodicalId":501297,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Principal Component Analysis to Heterogenous Fontan Registry Data Identifies Independent Contributing Factors to Decline\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Ferrari, Michal Schafer, Kendall Hunter, Michael DiMaria\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.11.24310309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Single ventricle heart disease is a severe and life-threatening illness, and improvements in clinical outcomes of those with Fontan circulation have not yet yielded acceptable survival over the past two decades. Patients are at risk of developing a diverse variety of Fontan-associated comorbidities that ultimately requires heart transplant. Our study goal was to determine if principal component analysis (PCA) applied to data collected from a substantial Fontan cohort can predict functional decline (N=140). Heterogeneous data broadly consisting of measures of cardiac and vascular function, exercise (VO2max), lymphatic biomarkers, and blood biomarkers were collected over 11 years at a single site; in that time, 16 events occurred that are considered here in a composite outcome measure. After standardization and PCA, principal components (PCs) representing >5% of total variance were thematically labeled based on their constituents and tested for association with the composite outcome. Our main findings suggest that the 6th PC (PC6), representing 7.1% percent of the total variance in the set, is greatly influenced by blood serum biomarkers and superior vena cava flow, is a superior measure of proportional hazard compared to EF, and displayed the greatest accuracy for classifying Fontan patients as determined by AUC. In bivariate hazard analysis, we found that models combining systolic function (EF or PC5) and lymphatic dysfunction (PC6) were most predictive, with the former having the greatest AIC, and the latter having the highest c-statistic. Our findings support our hypothesis that a multifactorial model must be considered to improve prognosis in the Fontan population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.11.24310309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.11.24310309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单心室心脏病是一种严重的危及生命的疾病,在过去二十年里,丰坦循环患者的临床治疗效果尚未得到改善,存活率也不尽人意。患者有可能患上各种与丰坦相关的并发症,最终需要进行心脏移植。我们的研究目标是确定将主成分分析(PCA)应用于从大量丰坦队列中收集的数据能否预测功能衰退(N=140)。我们在一个地点收集了11年的异质数据,这些数据广泛包括心脏和血管功能、运动(VO2max)、淋巴生物标记物和血液生物标记物的测量值;在此期间,共发生了16起事件,这些事件在综合结果测量中被考虑在内。经过标准化和 PCA 后,代表总方差 5%的主成分(PCs)根据其组成成分进行了主题标注,并测试了其与综合结果的关联性。我们的主要研究结果表明,第 6 个主成分(PC6)占主成分集总方差的 7.1%,受血清生物标志物和上腔静脉血流的影响很大,与 EF 相比,它是比例危险性的更优测量指标,而且根据 AUC 值对 Fontan 患者进行分类的准确性最高。在双变量危险分析中,我们发现结合收缩功能(EF 或 PC5)和淋巴功能障碍(PC6)的模型最具预测性,前者的 AIC 最大,后者的 c 统计量最高。我们的研究结果支持了我们的假设,即必须考虑采用多因素模型来改善Fontan人群的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Principal Component Analysis to Heterogenous Fontan Registry Data Identifies Independent Contributing Factors to Decline
Single ventricle heart disease is a severe and life-threatening illness, and improvements in clinical outcomes of those with Fontan circulation have not yet yielded acceptable survival over the past two decades. Patients are at risk of developing a diverse variety of Fontan-associated comorbidities that ultimately requires heart transplant. Our study goal was to determine if principal component analysis (PCA) applied to data collected from a substantial Fontan cohort can predict functional decline (N=140). Heterogeneous data broadly consisting of measures of cardiac and vascular function, exercise (VO2max), lymphatic biomarkers, and blood biomarkers were collected over 11 years at a single site; in that time, 16 events occurred that are considered here in a composite outcome measure. After standardization and PCA, principal components (PCs) representing >5% of total variance were thematically labeled based on their constituents and tested for association with the composite outcome. Our main findings suggest that the 6th PC (PC6), representing 7.1% percent of the total variance in the set, is greatly influenced by blood serum biomarkers and superior vena cava flow, is a superior measure of proportional hazard compared to EF, and displayed the greatest accuracy for classifying Fontan patients as determined by AUC. In bivariate hazard analysis, we found that models combining systolic function (EF or PC5) and lymphatic dysfunction (PC6) were most predictive, with the former having the greatest AIC, and the latter having the highest c-statistic. Our findings support our hypothesis that a multifactorial model must be considered to improve prognosis in the Fontan population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信