{"title":"使用气体反压回芯和高压泡沫注塑回芯工艺制造的发泡部件的表面质量和细胞形态研究","authors":"Chun‐Yang Chiu, Sen‐Yeu Yang, Shu‐Kai Yeh","doi":"10.1002/pen.26822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:label/>The core‐back process has substantially increased the range of applicability of foam injection molding (FIM) by increasing the pressure drop rate and expansion ratio. However, cell nucleation and growth occur concurrently with the flow of the melt/gas mixture during the filling stage, resulting in poor surface quality and a non‐uniform cell structure. This study investigated foam injection molding with gas counter pressure (GCP) and core‐back to produce foamed components, with comparison to high‐pressure FIM with core‐back process. Through this method, the nucleation during filling is suppressed. The surface roughness was improved to 0.987 μm, a 59% reduction compared to high‐pressure injection molding foam with core‐back. In addition, the cell uniformity was improved, measured at two locations near and far from the gate, the cell density reaching 1.7 × 10<jats:sup>5</jats:sup> and 2.1 × 10<jats:sup>5</jats:sup> cells/cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>, and cell size measuring 120.88 and 129.57 μm, respectively. GCP also prevented the formation of the bubbles larger than 500 μm at the location far from the gate. Even at the lowest recommended mold temperature, the combination of GCP and core‐back enables the production of high‐quality foamed components with reduced cooling time.Highlights<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Preventing the simultaneous occurrence of cell nucleation, growth and melt flow.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Foamed material with high surface quality produced by FIM.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Improving the cell uniformity throughout the foamed component.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Feasibility of GCP technology in conjunction with core‐back process.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":20281,"journal":{"name":"Polymer Engineering and Science","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on surface quality and cell morphology of foamed components fabricated using gas counter‐pressure with core‐back and high‐pressure foam injection molding with core‐back process\",\"authors\":\"Chun‐Yang Chiu, Sen‐Yeu Yang, Shu‐Kai Yeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pen.26822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<jats:label/>The core‐back process has substantially increased the range of applicability of foam injection molding (FIM) by increasing the pressure drop rate and expansion ratio. However, cell nucleation and growth occur concurrently with the flow of the melt/gas mixture during the filling stage, resulting in poor surface quality and a non‐uniform cell structure. This study investigated foam injection molding with gas counter pressure (GCP) and core‐back to produce foamed components, with comparison to high‐pressure FIM with core‐back process. Through this method, the nucleation during filling is suppressed. The surface roughness was improved to 0.987 μm, a 59% reduction compared to high‐pressure injection molding foam with core‐back. In addition, the cell uniformity was improved, measured at two locations near and far from the gate, the cell density reaching 1.7 × 10<jats:sup>5</jats:sup> and 2.1 × 10<jats:sup>5</jats:sup> cells/cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>, and cell size measuring 120.88 and 129.57 μm, respectively. GCP also prevented the formation of the bubbles larger than 500 μm at the location far from the gate. Even at the lowest recommended mold temperature, the combination of GCP and core‐back enables the production of high‐quality foamed components with reduced cooling time.Highlights<jats:list list-type=\\\"bullet\\\"> <jats:list-item>Preventing the simultaneous occurrence of cell nucleation, growth and melt flow.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Foamed material with high surface quality produced by FIM.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Improving the cell uniformity throughout the foamed component.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Feasibility of GCP technology in conjunction with core‐back process.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polymer Engineering and Science\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polymer Engineering and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.26822\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymer Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.26822","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Study on surface quality and cell morphology of foamed components fabricated using gas counter‐pressure with core‐back and high‐pressure foam injection molding with core‐back process
The core‐back process has substantially increased the range of applicability of foam injection molding (FIM) by increasing the pressure drop rate and expansion ratio. However, cell nucleation and growth occur concurrently with the flow of the melt/gas mixture during the filling stage, resulting in poor surface quality and a non‐uniform cell structure. This study investigated foam injection molding with gas counter pressure (GCP) and core‐back to produce foamed components, with comparison to high‐pressure FIM with core‐back process. Through this method, the nucleation during filling is suppressed. The surface roughness was improved to 0.987 μm, a 59% reduction compared to high‐pressure injection molding foam with core‐back. In addition, the cell uniformity was improved, measured at two locations near and far from the gate, the cell density reaching 1.7 × 105 and 2.1 × 105 cells/cm3, and cell size measuring 120.88 and 129.57 μm, respectively. GCP also prevented the formation of the bubbles larger than 500 μm at the location far from the gate. Even at the lowest recommended mold temperature, the combination of GCP and core‐back enables the production of high‐quality foamed components with reduced cooling time.HighlightsPreventing the simultaneous occurrence of cell nucleation, growth and melt flow.Foamed material with high surface quality produced by FIM.Improving the cell uniformity throughout the foamed component.Feasibility of GCP technology in conjunction with core‐back process.
期刊介绍:
For more than 30 years, Polymer Engineering & Science has been one of the most highly regarded journals in the field, serving as a forum for authors of treatises on the cutting edge of polymer science and technology. The importance of PE&S is underscored by the frequent rate at which its articles are cited, especially by other publications - literally thousand of times a year. Engineers, researchers, technicians, and academicians worldwide are looking to PE&S for the valuable information they need. There are special issues compiled by distinguished guest editors. These contain proceedings of symposia on such diverse topics as polyblends, mechanics of plastics and polymer welding.