使用留置硬膜外导管进行产前剖宫产时转为全身麻醉和静脉补充:一项回顾性研究

Michael Yohay Stav, Shai Fein, Yuri Matatov, Dana Hoffman, Philip Heesen, Yair Binyamin, Daniel Iluz-Freundlich, Leonid Eidelman, Sharon Orbach-Zinger
{"title":"使用留置硬膜外导管进行产前剖宫产时转为全身麻醉和静脉补充:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Michael Yohay Stav, Shai Fein, Yuri Matatov, Dana Hoffman, Philip Heesen, Yair Binyamin, Daniel Iluz-Freundlich, Leonid Eidelman, Sharon Orbach-Zinger","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery with or without conversion to general anesthesia has been shown to negatively impact maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce these adverse events are a recent focus of obstetric anesthesia care. We aimed to assess rates of and risk factors for conversion to general anesthesia and intraoperative pain during intrapartum cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter in our academic center. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, all women undergoing cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Labor epidural analgesia was provided according to a standardized protocol, and conversion to epidural anesthesia was achieved in the operating room before surgery. We determined the conversion rate to general anesthesia and associated risk factors. Second, we examined the rate of administration of analgesics/sedatives and related risk factors in cesarean cases that were not converted to general anesthesia. Results Among the 1192 women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia, there were 97 cases with conversion to general anesthesia (8.1%), of which 87 (89.7%) were due to a failed epidural. Higher age, higher weight, and higher gestational age were associated with decreased odds of conversion to general anesthesia. Higher gravidity and longer surgical time were associated with increased odds. An emergent indication was not associated with conversion to general anesthesia. Intravenous analgesic/sedative supplementation occurred in 141 cases (12.9%). Higher age was associated with decreased odds of supplementation, and longer surgical time was associated with increased odds. Conclusion In our tertiary academic center, the rate of intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia and administration of analgesic/sedative medication among women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia was relatively high. Emergency cesarean delivery was not associated with either of the above endpoints. Data are available upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversion to general anesthesia and intravenous supplementation during intrapartum cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter: a retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Michael Yohay Stav, Shai Fein, Yuri Matatov, Dana Hoffman, Philip Heesen, Yair Binyamin, Daniel Iluz-Freundlich, Leonid Eidelman, Sharon Orbach-Zinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery with or without conversion to general anesthesia has been shown to negatively impact maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce these adverse events are a recent focus of obstetric anesthesia care. We aimed to assess rates of and risk factors for conversion to general anesthesia and intraoperative pain during intrapartum cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter in our academic center. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, all women undergoing cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Labor epidural analgesia was provided according to a standardized protocol, and conversion to epidural anesthesia was achieved in the operating room before surgery. We determined the conversion rate to general anesthesia and associated risk factors. Second, we examined the rate of administration of analgesics/sedatives and related risk factors in cesarean cases that were not converted to general anesthesia. Results Among the 1192 women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia, there were 97 cases with conversion to general anesthesia (8.1%), of which 87 (89.7%) were due to a failed epidural. Higher age, higher weight, and higher gestational age were associated with decreased odds of conversion to general anesthesia. Higher gravidity and longer surgical time were associated with increased odds. An emergent indication was not associated with conversion to general anesthesia. Intravenous analgesic/sedative supplementation occurred in 141 cases (12.9%). Higher age was associated with decreased odds of supplementation, and longer surgical time was associated with increased odds. Conclusion In our tertiary academic center, the rate of intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia and administration of analgesic/sedative medication among women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia was relatively high. Emergency cesarean delivery was not associated with either of the above endpoints. Data are available upon reasonable request.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景剖宫产术中疼痛无论是否转为全身麻醉,都会对产妇和围产期发病率产生负面影响。努力减少这些不良事件是近期产科麻醉护理的重点。我们的目的是评估在我们的学术中心,使用留置硬膜外导管进行产中剖宫产时转为全身麻醉和术中疼痛的发生率和风险因素。方法 在这项回顾性队列研究中,纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间所有使用留置硬膜外导管进行剖宫产的产妇。根据标准化方案提供分娩硬膜外镇痛,手术前在手术室实现硬膜外麻醉转换。我们确定了全身麻醉的转换率和相关风险因素。其次,我们研究了未转为全身麻醉的剖宫产病例的镇痛剂/镇静剂使用率及相关风险因素。结果 在接受硬膜外麻醉的 1192 名产后剖宫产产妇中,有 97 例(8.1%)转为全身麻醉,其中 87 例(89.7%)是因为硬膜外麻醉失败。年龄越大、体重越重、胎龄越大,转为全身麻醉的几率越小。孕周越大、手术时间越长,转为全身麻醉的几率越高。紧急指征与转为全身麻醉无关。141例(12.9%)患者使用了静脉镇痛剂/镇静剂。年龄越大,补充的几率越低,手术时间越长,几率越高。结论 在我们的三级学术中心,接受硬膜外麻醉的产内剖宫产妇女术中转为全身麻醉和使用镇痛/镇静药物的比例相对较高。紧急剖宫产与上述终点均无关联。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conversion to general anesthesia and intravenous supplementation during intrapartum cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter: a retrospective study
Background Intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery with or without conversion to general anesthesia has been shown to negatively impact maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce these adverse events are a recent focus of obstetric anesthesia care. We aimed to assess rates of and risk factors for conversion to general anesthesia and intraoperative pain during intrapartum cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter in our academic center. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, all women undergoing cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Labor epidural analgesia was provided according to a standardized protocol, and conversion to epidural anesthesia was achieved in the operating room before surgery. We determined the conversion rate to general anesthesia and associated risk factors. Second, we examined the rate of administration of analgesics/sedatives and related risk factors in cesarean cases that were not converted to general anesthesia. Results Among the 1192 women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia, there were 97 cases with conversion to general anesthesia (8.1%), of which 87 (89.7%) were due to a failed epidural. Higher age, higher weight, and higher gestational age were associated with decreased odds of conversion to general anesthesia. Higher gravidity and longer surgical time were associated with increased odds. An emergent indication was not associated with conversion to general anesthesia. Intravenous analgesic/sedative supplementation occurred in 141 cases (12.9%). Higher age was associated with decreased odds of supplementation, and longer surgical time was associated with increased odds. Conclusion In our tertiary academic center, the rate of intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia and administration of analgesic/sedative medication among women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia was relatively high. Emergency cesarean delivery was not associated with either of the above endpoints. Data are available upon reasonable request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信