为不依赖语言的灵活性辩护,或者说:啮齿动物和人类在没有语言的情况下能做什么

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Mind & Language Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1111/mila.12522
Alexandre Duval
{"title":"为不依赖语言的灵活性辩护,或者说:啮齿动物和人类在没有语言的情况下能做什么","authors":"Alexandre Duval","doi":"10.1111/mila.12522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two main approaches within classical cognitive science to explaining how humans can entertain mental states that integrate contents across domains. <jats:italic>The language‐based framework</jats:italic> states that this ability arises from higher cognitive domain‐specific systems that combine their outputs through the language faculty, whereas <jats:italic>the language‐independent framework</jats:italic> holds that it comes from non‐language‐involving connections between such systems. This article turns on its head the most influential empirical argument for the language‐based framework, an argument that originates from research on spatial reorientation. I make the case that neuroscientific findings about spatial reorientation in rodents and humans bolster the language‐independent framework instead.","PeriodicalId":51472,"journal":{"name":"Mind & Language","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In defense of language‐independent flexibility, or: What rodents and humans can do without language\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Duval\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mila.12522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two main approaches within classical cognitive science to explaining how humans can entertain mental states that integrate contents across domains. <jats:italic>The language‐based framework</jats:italic> states that this ability arises from higher cognitive domain‐specific systems that combine their outputs through the language faculty, whereas <jats:italic>the language‐independent framework</jats:italic> holds that it comes from non‐language‐involving connections between such systems. This article turns on its head the most influential empirical argument for the language‐based framework, an argument that originates from research on spatial reorientation. I make the case that neuroscientific findings about spatial reorientation in rodents and humans bolster the language‐independent framework instead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mind & Language\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mind & Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12522\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind & Language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在经典认知科学中,有两种主要方法来解释人类如何能够产生整合跨领域内容的心理状态。基于语言的框架认为,这种能力来自于高级认知领域的特定系统,这些系统通过语言能力将它们的输出结合起来;而独立于语言的框架则认为,这种能力来自于这些系统之间不涉及语言的联系。本文颠覆了基于语言的框架最有影响力的实证论点,这一论点源自空间定向研究。我提出的论点是,神经科学对啮齿动物和人类空间定向的研究结果反而支持了语言无关框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In defense of language‐independent flexibility, or: What rodents and humans can do without language
There are two main approaches within classical cognitive science to explaining how humans can entertain mental states that integrate contents across domains. The language‐based framework states that this ability arises from higher cognitive domain‐specific systems that combine their outputs through the language faculty, whereas the language‐independent framework holds that it comes from non‐language‐involving connections between such systems. This article turns on its head the most influential empirical argument for the language‐based framework, an argument that originates from research on spatial reorientation. I make the case that neuroscientific findings about spatial reorientation in rodents and humans bolster the language‐independent framework instead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mind & Language
Mind & Language Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信