Maria Clara Martins Silva , Daniel Aloise , Sanjay Dominik Jena
{"title":"共享单车系统库存再平衡的数据驱动优先排序策略","authors":"Maria Clara Martins Silva , Daniel Aloise , Sanjay Dominik Jena","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The popularity of bike-sharing systems has constantly increased throughout the recent years. Most of such success can be attributed to their multiple benefits, such as user convenience, low usage costs, health benefits and their contribution to environmental relief. However, satisfying all user demands remains a challenge, given that the inventories of bike-sharing stations tend to be unbalanced over time. Bike-sharing system operators must therefore intervene to rebalance station inventories to provide both available bikes and empty docks to the commuters. Due to limited rebalancing resources, the number of stations to be rebalanced often exceeds the system’s rebalancing capacity, especially close to peak hours. As a consequence, operators are forced to manually select a subset of stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing. While most of the literature has concentrated either on predicting optimal station inventories or on the rebalancing itself, the identification of critical stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing has received little attention. Given the importance of this step in current operating practices, we propose three strategies to select the stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing, using features such as the predicted trip demand and the inventory levels at the stations themselves. Two sets of computational experiments aim at evaluating the performance of the proposed prioritization strategies on real-world data from Montreal’s bike-sharing system operator. The first set of experiments focuses on both the 2019 and 2020 seasons, each of which exhibits distinct travel patterns given the restrictive measures implemented in 2020 to prevent the spread of COVID-19. One of these strategies significantly improves by reducing the estimated lost demand by up to 65%, while another strategy reduces the estimated number of required rebalancing operations by up to 33% when compared to the prioritization scheme currently in use at the considered bike-sharing system. The second set of experiments evaluates the performance of the proposed strategies when rebalancing decisions are optimized in a rolling horizon planning. The results highlight various benefits of the proposed strategies, which are efficiently solved as transportation problems and improve lost demand over two intuitive baselines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103141"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001075/pdfft?md5=0b95a4e092ee73a47e213c647ac4016c&pid=1-s2.0-S0305048324001075-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-driven prioritization strategies for inventory rebalancing in bike-sharing systems\",\"authors\":\"Maria Clara Martins Silva , Daniel Aloise , Sanjay Dominik Jena\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The popularity of bike-sharing systems has constantly increased throughout the recent years. Most of such success can be attributed to their multiple benefits, such as user convenience, low usage costs, health benefits and their contribution to environmental relief. However, satisfying all user demands remains a challenge, given that the inventories of bike-sharing stations tend to be unbalanced over time. Bike-sharing system operators must therefore intervene to rebalance station inventories to provide both available bikes and empty docks to the commuters. Due to limited rebalancing resources, the number of stations to be rebalanced often exceeds the system’s rebalancing capacity, especially close to peak hours. As a consequence, operators are forced to manually select a subset of stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing. While most of the literature has concentrated either on predicting optimal station inventories or on the rebalancing itself, the identification of critical stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing has received little attention. Given the importance of this step in current operating practices, we propose three strategies to select the stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing, using features such as the predicted trip demand and the inventory levels at the stations themselves. Two sets of computational experiments aim at evaluating the performance of the proposed prioritization strategies on real-world data from Montreal’s bike-sharing system operator. The first set of experiments focuses on both the 2019 and 2020 seasons, each of which exhibits distinct travel patterns given the restrictive measures implemented in 2020 to prevent the spread of COVID-19. One of these strategies significantly improves by reducing the estimated lost demand by up to 65%, while another strategy reduces the estimated number of required rebalancing operations by up to 33% when compared to the prioritization scheme currently in use at the considered bike-sharing system. The second set of experiments evaluates the performance of the proposed strategies when rebalancing decisions are optimized in a rolling horizon planning. The results highlight various benefits of the proposed strategies, which are efficiently solved as transportation problems and improve lost demand over two intuitive baselines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001075/pdfft?md5=0b95a4e092ee73a47e213c647ac4016c&pid=1-s2.0-S0305048324001075-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Data-driven prioritization strategies for inventory rebalancing in bike-sharing systems
The popularity of bike-sharing systems has constantly increased throughout the recent years. Most of such success can be attributed to their multiple benefits, such as user convenience, low usage costs, health benefits and their contribution to environmental relief. However, satisfying all user demands remains a challenge, given that the inventories of bike-sharing stations tend to be unbalanced over time. Bike-sharing system operators must therefore intervene to rebalance station inventories to provide both available bikes and empty docks to the commuters. Due to limited rebalancing resources, the number of stations to be rebalanced often exceeds the system’s rebalancing capacity, especially close to peak hours. As a consequence, operators are forced to manually select a subset of stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing. While most of the literature has concentrated either on predicting optimal station inventories or on the rebalancing itself, the identification of critical stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing has received little attention. Given the importance of this step in current operating practices, we propose three strategies to select the stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing, using features such as the predicted trip demand and the inventory levels at the stations themselves. Two sets of computational experiments aim at evaluating the performance of the proposed prioritization strategies on real-world data from Montreal’s bike-sharing system operator. The first set of experiments focuses on both the 2019 and 2020 seasons, each of which exhibits distinct travel patterns given the restrictive measures implemented in 2020 to prevent the spread of COVID-19. One of these strategies significantly improves by reducing the estimated lost demand by up to 65%, while another strategy reduces the estimated number of required rebalancing operations by up to 33% when compared to the prioritization scheme currently in use at the considered bike-sharing system. The second set of experiments evaluates the performance of the proposed strategies when rebalancing decisions are optimized in a rolling horizon planning. The results highlight various benefits of the proposed strategies, which are efficiently solved as transportation problems and improve lost demand over two intuitive baselines.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.