数据包络分析中的知识流。同行效应的作用

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Nikos Chatzistamoulou , Kostas Kounetas , Kostas Tsekouras
{"title":"数据包络分析中的知识流。同行效应的作用","authors":"Nikos Chatzistamoulou ,&nbsp;Kostas Kounetas ,&nbsp;Kostas Tsekouras","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although the benchmarking literature has amassed both theoretical developments and empirical evidence on the performance of DMUs, the void related to the learning perspective of benchmarking remains to be filled. Further required methodological and empirical justifications aiming to fill this gap, are presented in this paper. Specifically, the mechanisms of knowledge transfer among the examined entities and the identification of the most influential source of learning require further investigation. We introduce a novel heuristic algorithm based on the Peer Removal to Improve Mean Efficiency in a Data Envelopment Analysis context to explore knowledge transfer within a benchmarking set. Based on sequential re-modifications of the technology following the removal of knowledge transmitters, a taxonomy arises including the role models, the knowledge receivers and the minimum efficiency DMU. Knowledge transfer is quantified by the calculation of the learning trace, following the removal of knowledge transmitters. We employ the most productive scale size to identify the most influential unit in terms of knowledge contribution. Findings from an illustrative example and a case study on European regions indicate that knowledge flows are not equally strong across benchmarking rounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103137"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge flows in Data Envelopment Analysis. The role of peer effects\",\"authors\":\"Nikos Chatzistamoulou ,&nbsp;Kostas Kounetas ,&nbsp;Kostas Tsekouras\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although the benchmarking literature has amassed both theoretical developments and empirical evidence on the performance of DMUs, the void related to the learning perspective of benchmarking remains to be filled. Further required methodological and empirical justifications aiming to fill this gap, are presented in this paper. Specifically, the mechanisms of knowledge transfer among the examined entities and the identification of the most influential source of learning require further investigation. We introduce a novel heuristic algorithm based on the Peer Removal to Improve Mean Efficiency in a Data Envelopment Analysis context to explore knowledge transfer within a benchmarking set. Based on sequential re-modifications of the technology following the removal of knowledge transmitters, a taxonomy arises including the role models, the knowledge receivers and the minimum efficiency DMU. Knowledge transfer is quantified by the calculation of the learning trace, following the removal of knowledge transmitters. We employ the most productive scale size to identify the most influential unit in terms of knowledge contribution. Findings from an illustrative example and a case study on European regions indicate that knowledge flows are not equally strong across benchmarking rounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管标杆管理文献已经积累了关于 DMU 业绩的理论发展和经验证据,但与标杆管理的学习视角相关的空白仍有待填补。本文提出了进一步所需的方法论和实证论证,旨在填补这一空白。具体而言,需要进一步研究被考察实体之间的知识转移机制,并确定最有影响力的学习来源。在数据包络分析的背景下,我们引入了一种基于 "去除同行以提高平均效率 "的新型启发式算法,以探索基准集内的知识转移。在移除知识传递者之后,根据对技术的连续再修改,产生了一个分类法,包括角色模型、知识接收者和最低效率 DMU。在去除知识传授者后,通过计算学习轨迹来量化知识转移。我们采用最具生产力的规模大小来确定在知识贡献方面最具影响力的单位。一个示例和一项关于欧洲地区的案例研究结果表明,各轮基准测试中的知识流动并不均衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Knowledge flows in Data Envelopment Analysis. The role of peer effects

Knowledge flows in Data Envelopment Analysis. The role of peer effects

Although the benchmarking literature has amassed both theoretical developments and empirical evidence on the performance of DMUs, the void related to the learning perspective of benchmarking remains to be filled. Further required methodological and empirical justifications aiming to fill this gap, are presented in this paper. Specifically, the mechanisms of knowledge transfer among the examined entities and the identification of the most influential source of learning require further investigation. We introduce a novel heuristic algorithm based on the Peer Removal to Improve Mean Efficiency in a Data Envelopment Analysis context to explore knowledge transfer within a benchmarking set. Based on sequential re-modifications of the technology following the removal of knowledge transmitters, a taxonomy arises including the role models, the knowledge receivers and the minimum efficiency DMU. Knowledge transfer is quantified by the calculation of the learning trace, following the removal of knowledge transmitters. We employ the most productive scale size to identify the most influential unit in terms of knowledge contribution. Findings from an illustrative example and a case study on European regions indicate that knowledge flows are not equally strong across benchmarking rounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信