{"title":"数据包络分析中的知识流。同行效应的作用","authors":"Nikos Chatzistamoulou , Kostas Kounetas , Kostas Tsekouras","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although the benchmarking literature has amassed both theoretical developments and empirical evidence on the performance of DMUs, the void related to the learning perspective of benchmarking remains to be filled. Further required methodological and empirical justifications aiming to fill this gap, are presented in this paper. Specifically, the mechanisms of knowledge transfer among the examined entities and the identification of the most influential source of learning require further investigation. We introduce a novel heuristic algorithm based on the Peer Removal to Improve Mean Efficiency in a Data Envelopment Analysis context to explore knowledge transfer within a benchmarking set. Based on sequential re-modifications of the technology following the removal of knowledge transmitters, a taxonomy arises including the role models, the knowledge receivers and the minimum efficiency DMU. Knowledge transfer is quantified by the calculation of the learning trace, following the removal of knowledge transmitters. We employ the most productive scale size to identify the most influential unit in terms of knowledge contribution. Findings from an illustrative example and a case study on European regions indicate that knowledge flows are not equally strong across benchmarking rounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103137"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge flows in Data Envelopment Analysis. The role of peer effects\",\"authors\":\"Nikos Chatzistamoulou , Kostas Kounetas , Kostas Tsekouras\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although the benchmarking literature has amassed both theoretical developments and empirical evidence on the performance of DMUs, the void related to the learning perspective of benchmarking remains to be filled. Further required methodological and empirical justifications aiming to fill this gap, are presented in this paper. Specifically, the mechanisms of knowledge transfer among the examined entities and the identification of the most influential source of learning require further investigation. We introduce a novel heuristic algorithm based on the Peer Removal to Improve Mean Efficiency in a Data Envelopment Analysis context to explore knowledge transfer within a benchmarking set. Based on sequential re-modifications of the technology following the removal of knowledge transmitters, a taxonomy arises including the role models, the knowledge receivers and the minimum efficiency DMU. Knowledge transfer is quantified by the calculation of the learning trace, following the removal of knowledge transmitters. We employ the most productive scale size to identify the most influential unit in terms of knowledge contribution. Findings from an illustrative example and a case study on European regions indicate that knowledge flows are not equally strong across benchmarking rounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge flows in Data Envelopment Analysis. The role of peer effects
Although the benchmarking literature has amassed both theoretical developments and empirical evidence on the performance of DMUs, the void related to the learning perspective of benchmarking remains to be filled. Further required methodological and empirical justifications aiming to fill this gap, are presented in this paper. Specifically, the mechanisms of knowledge transfer among the examined entities and the identification of the most influential source of learning require further investigation. We introduce a novel heuristic algorithm based on the Peer Removal to Improve Mean Efficiency in a Data Envelopment Analysis context to explore knowledge transfer within a benchmarking set. Based on sequential re-modifications of the technology following the removal of knowledge transmitters, a taxonomy arises including the role models, the knowledge receivers and the minimum efficiency DMU. Knowledge transfer is quantified by the calculation of the learning trace, following the removal of knowledge transmitters. We employ the most productive scale size to identify the most influential unit in terms of knowledge contribution. Findings from an illustrative example and a case study on European regions indicate that knowledge flows are not equally strong across benchmarking rounds.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.