Daimantas Milonas , Alexander Giesen , Annouschka Laenen , Gaëtan Devos , Alberto Briganti , Paolo Gontero , R. Jeffrey Karnes , Piotr Chlosta , Frank Claessens , Gert De Meerleer , Wouter Everaerts , Markus Graefen , Giansilvio Marchioro , Rafael Sanchez-Salas , Bertrand Tombal , Henk Van Der Poel , Hendrik Van Poppel , Martin Spahn , Steven Joniau , for the European Multicenter Prostate Cancer Clinical and Translational Research Group (EMPaCT)
{"title":"根治性前列腺切除术对根据 STAMPEDE 标准选择的高风险非转移性前列腺癌男性生存率的影响:一项 EMPaCT 研究。","authors":"Daimantas Milonas , Alexander Giesen , Annouschka Laenen , Gaëtan Devos , Alberto Briganti , Paolo Gontero , R. Jeffrey Karnes , Piotr Chlosta , Frank Claessens , Gert De Meerleer , Wouter Everaerts , Markus Graefen , Giansilvio Marchioro , Rafael Sanchez-Salas , Bertrand Tombal , Henk Van Der Poel , Hendrik Van Poppel , Martin Spahn , Steven Joniau , for the European Multicenter Prostate Cancer Clinical and Translational Research Group (EMPaCT)","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>A meta-analysis of two randomized STAMPEDE platform trials revealed that 3 yr of abiraterone acetate in addition to androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy significantly improved metastasis-free and overall survival (OS) in high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and should be considered a new standard of care. The aim of our study was to assess long-term cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS for surgically treated patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic node-negative PCa meeting the STAMPEDE criteria for high risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with European Association of Urology (EAU) high-risk PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. CSS was assessed using cumulative incidence curves and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate OS. We used a Fine and Gray model to evaluate the prognostic value of STAMPEDE high-risk factors (SHRFs) for CSS, and a Cox proportional-hazards model to assess the association of SHRFs with OS.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>A total of 2994 patients with EAU high-risk PCa were divided into groups with 0, 1, 2, or 3 SHRFs. The 10-yr survival estimates for patients with 0–1 versus 2–3 SHRFs were 95% versus 82% for CSS and 81% versus 64% for OS (both <em>p</em> < 0.0001). In comparison to patients with 0 SHRFs, hazard ratios were 1.2 (<em>p</em> = 0.5), 3.9 (<em>p</em> < 0.0001), and 5.5 (<em>p</em> < 0.0001) for CSS, and 1.1 (<em>p</em> = 0.4), 2.2 (<em>p</em> < 0.0001), and 2.5 (<em>p</em> = 0.0004) for OS for patients with 1, 2, and 3 SHRFs, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Our results confirm that the STAMPEDE high-risk criteria identify a subgroup of patients with highly aggressive PCa features and adverse long-term oncological outcomes. This population is likely to benefit most from aggressive multimodal treatment. Nevertheless, we have shown for the first time that surgery remains a viable treatment option for patients with STAMPEDE high-risk PCa.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>Prostate cancer that meets the high-risk definitions from the STAMPEDE trial is an aggressive type of cancer. Our results for long-term cancer control outcomes indicate that surgery is a viable option for the subgroup of patients with this type of prostate cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":"7 6","pages":"Pages 1478-1486"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Radical Prostatectomy on Survival for Men with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Features Selected According to STAMPEDE Criteria: An EMPaCT Study\",\"authors\":\"Daimantas Milonas , Alexander Giesen , Annouschka Laenen , Gaëtan Devos , Alberto Briganti , Paolo Gontero , R. Jeffrey Karnes , Piotr Chlosta , Frank Claessens , Gert De Meerleer , Wouter Everaerts , Markus Graefen , Giansilvio Marchioro , Rafael Sanchez-Salas , Bertrand Tombal , Henk Van Der Poel , Hendrik Van Poppel , Martin Spahn , Steven Joniau , for the European Multicenter Prostate Cancer Clinical and Translational Research Group (EMPaCT)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>A meta-analysis of two randomized STAMPEDE platform trials revealed that 3 yr of abiraterone acetate in addition to androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy significantly improved metastasis-free and overall survival (OS) in high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and should be considered a new standard of care. The aim of our study was to assess long-term cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS for surgically treated patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic node-negative PCa meeting the STAMPEDE criteria for high risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with European Association of Urology (EAU) high-risk PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. CSS was assessed using cumulative incidence curves and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate OS. We used a Fine and Gray model to evaluate the prognostic value of STAMPEDE high-risk factors (SHRFs) for CSS, and a Cox proportional-hazards model to assess the association of SHRFs with OS.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>A total of 2994 patients with EAU high-risk PCa were divided into groups with 0, 1, 2, or 3 SHRFs. The 10-yr survival estimates for patients with 0–1 versus 2–3 SHRFs were 95% versus 82% for CSS and 81% versus 64% for OS (both <em>p</em> < 0.0001). In comparison to patients with 0 SHRFs, hazard ratios were 1.2 (<em>p</em> = 0.5), 3.9 (<em>p</em> < 0.0001), and 5.5 (<em>p</em> < 0.0001) for CSS, and 1.1 (<em>p</em> = 0.4), 2.2 (<em>p</em> < 0.0001), and 2.5 (<em>p</em> = 0.0004) for OS for patients with 1, 2, and 3 SHRFs, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Our results confirm that the STAMPEDE high-risk criteria identify a subgroup of patients with highly aggressive PCa features and adverse long-term oncological outcomes. This population is likely to benefit most from aggressive multimodal treatment. Nevertheless, we have shown for the first time that surgery remains a viable treatment option for patients with STAMPEDE high-risk PCa.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>Prostate cancer that meets the high-risk definitions from the STAMPEDE trial is an aggressive type of cancer. Our results for long-term cancer control outcomes indicate that surgery is a viable option for the subgroup of patients with this type of prostate cancer.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1478-1486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588931124001470\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588931124001470","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Radical Prostatectomy on Survival for Men with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Features Selected According to STAMPEDE Criteria: An EMPaCT Study
Background and objective
A meta-analysis of two randomized STAMPEDE platform trials revealed that 3 yr of abiraterone acetate in addition to androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy significantly improved metastasis-free and overall survival (OS) in high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and should be considered a new standard of care. The aim of our study was to assess long-term cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS for surgically treated patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic node-negative PCa meeting the STAMPEDE criteria for high risk.
Methods
This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with European Association of Urology (EAU) high-risk PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. CSS was assessed using cumulative incidence curves and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate OS. We used a Fine and Gray model to evaluate the prognostic value of STAMPEDE high-risk factors (SHRFs) for CSS, and a Cox proportional-hazards model to assess the association of SHRFs with OS.
Key findings and limitations
A total of 2994 patients with EAU high-risk PCa were divided into groups with 0, 1, 2, or 3 SHRFs. The 10-yr survival estimates for patients with 0–1 versus 2–3 SHRFs were 95% versus 82% for CSS and 81% versus 64% for OS (both p < 0.0001). In comparison to patients with 0 SHRFs, hazard ratios were 1.2 (p = 0.5), 3.9 (p < 0.0001), and 5.5 (p < 0.0001) for CSS, and 1.1 (p = 0.4), 2.2 (p < 0.0001), and 2.5 (p = 0.0004) for OS for patients with 1, 2, and 3 SHRFs, respectively.
Conclusions and clinical implications
Our results confirm that the STAMPEDE high-risk criteria identify a subgroup of patients with highly aggressive PCa features and adverse long-term oncological outcomes. This population is likely to benefit most from aggressive multimodal treatment. Nevertheless, we have shown for the first time that surgery remains a viable treatment option for patients with STAMPEDE high-risk PCa.
Patient summary
Prostate cancer that meets the high-risk definitions from the STAMPEDE trial is an aggressive type of cancer. Our results for long-term cancer control outcomes indicate that surgery is a viable option for the subgroup of patients with this type of prostate cancer.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format