为字母汤排序:提高一致性和开发渔业科学词汇工具框架的战略

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Chantel R. Wetzel , Christine C. Stawitz , Bai Li , Kelli F. Johnson , Giselle M. Schmitz
{"title":"为字母汤排序:提高一致性和开发渔业科学词汇工具框架的战略","authors":"Chantel R. Wetzel ,&nbsp;Christine C. Stawitz ,&nbsp;Bai Li ,&nbsp;Kelli F. Johnson ,&nbsp;Giselle M. Schmitz","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantitative methods for assessing the status of marine fish populations began in the 19th century with simple catch-curve analysis and have evolved through the decades to use more advanced integrated statistical modeling. The corresponding assessment documents that communicate model estimates to other scientists and fisheries managers, generally, have grown in length and complexity, often describing hundreds of parameter estimates and population dynamics. These documents use a wide range of synonyms or similar terms that can vary either within a single assessment document or among other documents within or across fisheries management regions. The lack of standardization of terms used in assessment documents can lead to challenges in scientific reviews, communicating scientific results to fisheries managers, and for understanding assessments from other management regions. We analyzed the text of 134 assessment documents used to communicate the results of assessment software to managers from the varying management regions in the United States, Australia, and European International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) to quantify the presence of synonyms or similar terms that are often used interchangeably and highlight ways in which the output language could be harmonized without modifying meaning. Next, we developed an open source web-based dictionary and schema for fisheries science where the community can propose and adopt terms to create an agreed upon terminology. Finally, looking forward to future development, we propose approaches to leverage pre-existing frameworks such as Google coding standards to guide the development of tools to merge long-term ecological data sets, name objects in code bases, and report output. While this guidance is tailored to fisheries practitioners working within the U.S. management system, we aim to align with international standards to increase consistency across the international fisheries science community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ordering the alphabet soup: Strategies to improve consistency and develop a framework of tools for fisheries science vocabulary\",\"authors\":\"Chantel R. Wetzel ,&nbsp;Christine C. Stawitz ,&nbsp;Bai Li ,&nbsp;Kelli F. Johnson ,&nbsp;Giselle M. Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Quantitative methods for assessing the status of marine fish populations began in the 19th century with simple catch-curve analysis and have evolved through the decades to use more advanced integrated statistical modeling. The corresponding assessment documents that communicate model estimates to other scientists and fisheries managers, generally, have grown in length and complexity, often describing hundreds of parameter estimates and population dynamics. These documents use a wide range of synonyms or similar terms that can vary either within a single assessment document or among other documents within or across fisheries management regions. The lack of standardization of terms used in assessment documents can lead to challenges in scientific reviews, communicating scientific results to fisheries managers, and for understanding assessments from other management regions. We analyzed the text of 134 assessment documents used to communicate the results of assessment software to managers from the varying management regions in the United States, Australia, and European International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) to quantify the presence of synonyms or similar terms that are often used interchangeably and highlight ways in which the output language could be harmonized without modifying meaning. Next, we developed an open source web-based dictionary and schema for fisheries science where the community can propose and adopt terms to create an agreed upon terminology. Finally, looking forward to future development, we propose approaches to leverage pre-existing frameworks such as Google coding standards to guide the development of tools to merge long-term ecological data sets, name objects in code bases, and report output. While this guidance is tailored to fisheries practitioners working within the U.S. management system, we aim to align with international standards to increase consistency across the international fisheries science community.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624001681\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624001681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估海洋鱼类种群状况的定量方法始于 19 世纪的简单渔获量曲线分析,经过数 十年的发展,已使用更先进的综合统计模型。一般来说,向其他科学家和渔业管理者传达模型估计值的相应评估文件越来越长,也越来越复杂,通常要描述数百个参数估计值和种群动态。这些文件使用了大量同义词或类似术语,这些术语在单个评估文件中或在渔业管理区域内或跨区域的其他文件中可能会有所不同。评估文件中使用的术语缺乏标准化会给科学审查、向渔业管理者传达科学结果以及理解其他管理区域的评估结果带来挑战。我们分析了用于向美国、澳大利亚和欧洲国际海洋考察理事会(ICES)不同管理区域的管理者传达评估软件结果的 134 份评估文件的文本,以量化经常交替使用的同义词或类似术语的存在情况,并强调在不改变含义的情况下统一输出语言的方法。接下来,我们为渔业科学开发了一个开放源码的网络字典和模式,社区可以提出和采用术语,以创建一个商定的术语。最后,展望未来发展,我们提出了利用现有框架(如谷歌编码标准)的方法,以指导合并长期生态数据集、命名代码库中的对象和报告输出的工具开发。虽然本指南是为在美国管理系统内工作的渔业从业人员量身定制的,但我们的目标是与国际标准接轨,以提高整个国际渔业科学界的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ordering the alphabet soup: Strategies to improve consistency and develop a framework of tools for fisheries science vocabulary

Quantitative methods for assessing the status of marine fish populations began in the 19th century with simple catch-curve analysis and have evolved through the decades to use more advanced integrated statistical modeling. The corresponding assessment documents that communicate model estimates to other scientists and fisheries managers, generally, have grown in length and complexity, often describing hundreds of parameter estimates and population dynamics. These documents use a wide range of synonyms or similar terms that can vary either within a single assessment document or among other documents within or across fisheries management regions. The lack of standardization of terms used in assessment documents can lead to challenges in scientific reviews, communicating scientific results to fisheries managers, and for understanding assessments from other management regions. We analyzed the text of 134 assessment documents used to communicate the results of assessment software to managers from the varying management regions in the United States, Australia, and European International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) to quantify the presence of synonyms or similar terms that are often used interchangeably and highlight ways in which the output language could be harmonized without modifying meaning. Next, we developed an open source web-based dictionary and schema for fisheries science where the community can propose and adopt terms to create an agreed upon terminology. Finally, looking forward to future development, we propose approaches to leverage pre-existing frameworks such as Google coding standards to guide the development of tools to merge long-term ecological data sets, name objects in code bases, and report output. While this guidance is tailored to fisheries practitioners working within the U.S. management system, we aim to align with international standards to increase consistency across the international fisheries science community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fisheries Research
Fisheries Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信