改善学术性初级医疗机构的儿科高血压筛查。

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-07-10 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000746
Vildan Tas, Esma Birisci, Rachel Achor Jones, John J Forbus, Richard T Blaszak, Brendan Crawford, Mohammad Ilyas, James S Magee, Laura L Sisterhen
{"title":"改善学术性初级医疗机构的儿科高血压筛查。","authors":"Vildan Tas, Esma Birisci, Rachel Achor Jones, John J Forbus, Richard T Blaszak, Brendan Crawford, Mohammad Ilyas, James S Magee, Laura L Sisterhen","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics clinical practice guidelines for screening and managing high blood pressure (BP) is low. This team sought to improve recognition and documentation of relevant diagnoses in patients aged 13-20 years who presented to general pediatric clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome measure was the proportion of office visits for patients ages 13-20 with a BP ≥ 120/80 with a visit or problem list diagnosis of hypertension or elevated BP. Secondary measures included (1) the proportion of patients who had their BP measured in the right arm, (2) the proportion of patients who had a mid-arm circumference measurement recorded, and (3) the proportion of patients who had a second BP reading measured at the visit. Interventions addressed key drivers for evidence-based high BP screening: standard BP measurement, electronic health record clinical decision support, and clinical pathway adoption. Data were collected over a twenty-seven-month period and plotted using the Laney p' chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Provider documentation of elevated BP or hypertension improved from a baseline mean of 24% in April 2020 through January 2022 to 41% in February 2021 through June 2022. All secondary outcome measures also demonstrated significant improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project demonstrates the feasibility of improving adherence to best practices of BP measurement in primary care clinics through education, acquisition of resources, and implementation of electronic health record flags for abnormal values.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Pediatric Hypertension Screening in an Academic Primary Care Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Vildan Tas, Esma Birisci, Rachel Achor Jones, John J Forbus, Richard T Blaszak, Brendan Crawford, Mohammad Ilyas, James S Magee, Laura L Sisterhen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics clinical practice guidelines for screening and managing high blood pressure (BP) is low. This team sought to improve recognition and documentation of relevant diagnoses in patients aged 13-20 years who presented to general pediatric clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome measure was the proportion of office visits for patients ages 13-20 with a BP ≥ 120/80 with a visit or problem list diagnosis of hypertension or elevated BP. Secondary measures included (1) the proportion of patients who had their BP measured in the right arm, (2) the proportion of patients who had a mid-arm circumference measurement recorded, and (3) the proportion of patients who had a second BP reading measured at the visit. Interventions addressed key drivers for evidence-based high BP screening: standard BP measurement, electronic health record clinical decision support, and clinical pathway adoption. Data were collected over a twenty-seven-month period and plotted using the Laney p' chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Provider documentation of elevated BP or hypertension improved from a baseline mean of 24% in April 2020 through January 2022 to 41% in February 2021 through June 2022. All secondary outcome measures also demonstrated significant improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project demonstrates the feasibility of improving adherence to best practices of BP measurement in primary care clinics through education, acquisition of resources, and implementation of electronic health record flags for abnormal values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:美国儿科学会关于筛查和管理高血压(BP)的临床实践指南的遵守率很低。该研究小组试图提高普通儿科诊所对 13-20 岁患者相关诊断的识别和记录:主要结果指标是血压≥ 120/80 且就诊或问题清单诊断为高血压或血压升高的 13-20 岁患者的就诊比例。次要衡量指标包括:(1)测量右臂血压的患者比例;(2)记录中臂围测量值的患者比例;(3)就诊时测量第二次血压读数的患者比例。干预措施涉及循证高血压筛查的关键驱动因素:标准血压测量、电子健康记录临床决策支持和临床路径采用。数据收集历时 27 个月,采用 Laney P' 图表绘制:结果:医疗服务提供者对血压升高或高血压的记录从 2020 年 4 月至 2022 年 1 月的 24% 的基线平均值提高到 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 6 月的 41%。所有次要结果指标也都有显著改善:该项目证明了通过教育、获取资源和实施电子健康记录异常值标记来提高初级保健诊所坚持血压测量最佳实践的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Pediatric Hypertension Screening in an Academic Primary Care Setting.

Introduction: Adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics clinical practice guidelines for screening and managing high blood pressure (BP) is low. This team sought to improve recognition and documentation of relevant diagnoses in patients aged 13-20 years who presented to general pediatric clinics.

Methods: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of office visits for patients ages 13-20 with a BP ≥ 120/80 with a visit or problem list diagnosis of hypertension or elevated BP. Secondary measures included (1) the proportion of patients who had their BP measured in the right arm, (2) the proportion of patients who had a mid-arm circumference measurement recorded, and (3) the proportion of patients who had a second BP reading measured at the visit. Interventions addressed key drivers for evidence-based high BP screening: standard BP measurement, electronic health record clinical decision support, and clinical pathway adoption. Data were collected over a twenty-seven-month period and plotted using the Laney p' chart.

Results: Provider documentation of elevated BP or hypertension improved from a baseline mean of 24% in April 2020 through January 2022 to 41% in February 2021 through June 2022. All secondary outcome measures also demonstrated significant improvement.

Conclusions: This project demonstrates the feasibility of improving adherence to best practices of BP measurement in primary care clinics through education, acquisition of resources, and implementation of electronic health record flags for abnormal values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信