内窥镜经腹腹膜前补片成形术(TAPP)治疗根治性前列腺切除术后腹股沟疝的腹膜高切口方法。

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Tetsu Yamamoto, Ryoji Hyakudomi, Kiyoe Takai, Yuki Uchida, Kazunari Ishitobi, Noriyuki Hirahara, Yoshitsugu Tajima
{"title":"内窥镜经腹腹膜前补片成形术(TAPP)治疗根治性前列腺切除术后腹股沟疝的腹膜高切口方法。","authors":"Tetsu Yamamoto,&nbsp;Ryoji Hyakudomi,&nbsp;Kiyoe Takai,&nbsp;Yuki Uchida,&nbsp;Kazunari Ishitobi,&nbsp;Noriyuki Hirahara,&nbsp;Yoshitsugu Tajima","doi":"10.1111/ases.13353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot-assisted RP (RARP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty-four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (<i>p</i> = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, <i>p</i> = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow-up period of 48 months in both groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Tetsu Yamamoto,&nbsp;Ryoji Hyakudomi,&nbsp;Kiyoe Takai,&nbsp;Yuki Uchida,&nbsp;Kazunari Ishitobi,&nbsp;Noriyuki Hirahara,&nbsp;Yoshitsugu Tajima\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ases.13353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot-assisted RP (RARP).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty-four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (<i>p</i> = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, <i>p</i> = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow-up period of 48 months in both groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.13353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.13353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹股沟疝是机器人或腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(RP)后常见的并发症之一。由于术后腹膜前腔严重粘连,经腹腹膜前补片成形术(TAPP)治疗前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝很难实施。我们在 TAPP 中引入了高腹膜切口方法 (HPIA),用于治疗因 RP 术后严重粘连而难以进行腹膜剥离的腹股沟疝患者。我们评估了对机器人辅助 RP(RARP)术后腹股沟疝患者采用高腹膜切口 TAPP 的安全性和有效性:通过回顾性分析评估患者特征和手术结果:2014年1月至2017年12月,连续21例患者在RARP术后因腹股沟疝接受了TAPP手术。根据Nyhus分类法,24例病变为3b型,3例为3a型。8 名患者的 10 个疝气病灶采用了环形切口 TAPP,13 名患者的 17 个病灶采用了带 HPIA 的 TAPP。单侧疝气 HPIA 的平均手术时间(137.8 ± 20.7 分钟)明显短于环形切口 TAPP 的平均手术时间(182.2 ± 42.0 分钟)(P = 0.038)。所有患者都完成了 HPIA,而圆形切口 TAPP 有 5 名患者(55.6%,p = .008)因粘连致密且难以剥离而转为腹膜内嵌网术(IPOM)。两组随访 48 个月后均未发现复发:结论:对于RARP术后的腹股沟疝患者,TAPP加HPIA是一种可行且安全可靠的首选治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy

Background

Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot-assisted RP (RARP).

Methods

Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis.

Results

From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty-four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow-up period of 48 months in both groups.

Conclusions

The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信