[基于机器学习的糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者个性化血糖管理]。

Q3 Medicine
Ruirui Wang, Lijuan Wu, Huixian Li, Xin Li
{"title":"[基于机器学习的糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者个性化血糖管理]。","authors":"Ruirui Wang, Lijuan Wu, Huixian Li, Xin Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240130-00096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the optimal blood glucose-lowering strategies for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) to enhance personalized treatment effects using machine learning techniques based on the United States Critical Care Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care- IV (MIMIC- IV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the MIMIC- IV database, the case data of 2 096 patients with DKA admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008 to 2019 were analyzed. Machine learning models were developed, and receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) and precision-recall curve (PR curve) were plotted to evaluate the model's effectiveness in predicting four common adverse outcomes: hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, reductions in Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and extended hospital stays. The risk of adverse outcomes was analyzed in relation to the rate of blood glucose decrease. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between relevant factors and the risk of hypokalemia. Personalized risk interpretation methods and predictive technologies were applied to individualize the analysis of optimal glucose control ranges for patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The machine learning models demonstrated excellent performance in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with DKA, with areas under the ROC curve (AUROC) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for predicting hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, GCS score reduction, and extended hospital stays being 0.826 (0.803-0.849), 0.850 (0.828-0.870), 0.925 (0.903-0.946), and 0.901 (0.883-0.920), respectively. Analysis of the relationship between the rate of blood glucose reduction and the risk of four adverse outcomes showed that a maximum glucose reduction rate > 6.26 mmol×L<sup>-1</sup>×h<sup>-1</sup> significantly increased the risk of hypoglycemia (P < 0.001); a rate > 2.72 mmol×L<sup>-1</sup>×h<sup>-1</sup> significantly elevated the risk of hypokalemia (P < 0.001); a rate > 5.53 mmol×L<sup>-1</sup>×h<sup>-1</sup> significantly reduced the risk of GCS score reduction (P < 0.001); and a rate > 8.03 mmol×L<sup>-1</sup>×h<sup>-1</sup> significantly shortened the length of hospital stay (P < 0.001). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated significant correlations between maximum bicarbonate levels, blood urea nitrogen levels, and total insulin doses with the risk of hypokalemia (all P < 0.01). In terms of establishing personalized optimal treatment thresholds, assuming optimal glucose reduction thresholds for hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, GCS score reduction, and extended hospital stay were x<sub>1</sub>, x<sub>2</sub>, x<sub>3</sub>, x<sub>4</sub>, respectively, the recommended glucose reduction rates to minimize the risks of hypokalemia and hypoglycemia should be ≤min{x<sub>1</sub>, x<sub>2</sub>}, while those to reduce GCS score decline and extended hospital stay should be ≥ max{x<sub>3</sub>, x<sub>4</sub>}. When these ranges overlap, i.e., max{x<sub>3</sub>, x<sub>4</sub>} ≤ min{x<sub>1</sub>, x<sub>2</sub>}, this interval was the recommended optimal glucose reduction range. If there was no overlap between these ranges, i.e., max{x<sub>3</sub>, x<sub>4</sub>} > min{x<sub>1</sub>, x<sub>2</sub>}, the treatment strategy should be dynamically adjusted considering individual differences in the risk of various adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The machine learning models shows good performance in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with DKA, assisting in personalized blood glucose management and holding important clinical application prospects.</p>","PeriodicalId":24079,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","volume":"36 6","pages":"635-642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Personalized glycemic management for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis based on machine learning].\",\"authors\":\"Ruirui Wang, Lijuan Wu, Huixian Li, Xin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240130-00096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the optimal blood glucose-lowering strategies for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) to enhance personalized treatment effects using machine learning techniques based on the United States Critical Care Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care- IV (MIMIC- IV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the MIMIC- IV database, the case data of 2 096 patients with DKA admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008 to 2019 were analyzed. Machine learning models were developed, and receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) and precision-recall curve (PR curve) were plotted to evaluate the model's effectiveness in predicting four common adverse outcomes: hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, reductions in Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and extended hospital stays. The risk of adverse outcomes was analyzed in relation to the rate of blood glucose decrease. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between relevant factors and the risk of hypokalemia. Personalized risk interpretation methods and predictive technologies were applied to individualize the analysis of optimal glucose control ranges for patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The machine learning models demonstrated excellent performance in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with DKA, with areas under the ROC curve (AUROC) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for predicting hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, GCS score reduction, and extended hospital stays being 0.826 (0.803-0.849), 0.850 (0.828-0.870), 0.925 (0.903-0.946), and 0.901 (0.883-0.920), respectively. Analysis of the relationship between the rate of blood glucose reduction and the risk of four adverse outcomes showed that a maximum glucose reduction rate > 6.26 mmol×L<sup>-1</sup>×h<sup>-1</sup> significantly increased the risk of hypoglycemia (P < 0.001); a rate > 2.72 mmol×L<sup>-1</sup>×h<sup>-1</sup> significantly elevated the risk of hypokalemia (P < 0.001); a rate > 5.53 mmol×L<sup>-1</sup>×h<sup>-1</sup> significantly reduced the risk of GCS score reduction (P < 0.001); and a rate > 8.03 mmol×L<sup>-1</sup>×h<sup>-1</sup> significantly shortened the length of hospital stay (P < 0.001). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated significant correlations between maximum bicarbonate levels, blood urea nitrogen levels, and total insulin doses with the risk of hypokalemia (all P < 0.01). In terms of establishing personalized optimal treatment thresholds, assuming optimal glucose reduction thresholds for hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, GCS score reduction, and extended hospital stay were x<sub>1</sub>, x<sub>2</sub>, x<sub>3</sub>, x<sub>4</sub>, respectively, the recommended glucose reduction rates to minimize the risks of hypokalemia and hypoglycemia should be ≤min{x<sub>1</sub>, x<sub>2</sub>}, while those to reduce GCS score decline and extended hospital stay should be ≥ max{x<sub>3</sub>, x<sub>4</sub>}. When these ranges overlap, i.e., max{x<sub>3</sub>, x<sub>4</sub>} ≤ min{x<sub>1</sub>, x<sub>2</sub>}, this interval was the recommended optimal glucose reduction range. If there was no overlap between these ranges, i.e., max{x<sub>3</sub>, x<sub>4</sub>} > min{x<sub>1</sub>, x<sub>2</sub>}, the treatment strategy should be dynamically adjusted considering individual differences in the risk of various adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The machine learning models shows good performance in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with DKA, assisting in personalized blood glucose management and holding important clinical application prospects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"635-642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240130-00096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240130-00096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探索糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)患者的最佳降血糖策略,利用基于美国重症监护医疗信息集市-IV(MIMIC- IV)的机器学习技术提高个性化治疗效果:利用MIMIC- IV数据库,分析了贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心重症监护室(ICU)从2008年至2019年收治的2 096名DKA患者的病例数据。开发了机器学习模型,并绘制了接收器操作者特征曲线(ROC 曲线)和精确度-召回曲线(PR 曲线),以评估该模型在预测四种常见不良结局(低血糖、低钾血症、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)降低和住院时间延长)方面的有效性。不良后果的风险分析与血糖下降率有关。进行了单变量和多变量 Logistic 回归分析,以研究相关因素与低钾血症风险之间的关系。应用个性化风险解释方法和预测技术,对患者的最佳血糖控制范围进行个性化分析:机器学习模型在预测DKA患者不良结局方面表现出色,预测低血糖、低钾血症、GCS评分降低和住院时间延长的ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)和95%置信区间(95%CI)分别为0.826(0.803-0.849)、0.850(0.828-0.870)、0.925(0.903-0.946)和0.901(0.883-0.920)。血糖降低率与四种不良结局风险之间关系的分析表明,最大血糖降低率 > 6.26 mmol×L-1×h-1 会显著增加低血糖风险(P < 0.001);血糖降低率 > 2.72 mmol×L-1×h-1显著增加了低钾血症的风险(P < 0.001);> 5.53 mmol×L-1×h-1显著降低了GCS评分降低的风险(P < 0.001);> 8.03 mmol×L-1×h-1显著缩短了住院时间(P < 0.001)。多变量 Logistic 回归分析表明,最高碳酸氢盐水平、血尿素氮水平和胰岛素总剂量与低钾血症风险之间存在显著相关性(均 P <0.01)。在建立个性化最佳治疗阈值方面,假设低血糖、低钾血症、GCS 评分下降和住院时间延长的最佳降糖阈值分别为 x1、x2、x3、x4,则为最大限度降低低钾血症和低血糖风险而推荐的降糖率应≤min{x1、x2},而为降低 GCS 评分下降和住院时间延长而推荐的降糖率应≥max{x3、x4}。当这些范围重叠时,即 max{x3, x4} ≤ min{x1, x2},该区间即为推荐的最佳降糖范围。如果这些范围没有重叠,即最大{x3,x4} > 最小{x1,x2}。如果这些范围之间没有重叠,即 max{x3, x4} > min{x1, x2},则应考虑到各种不良后果风险的个体差异,动态调整治疗策略:结论:机器学习模型在预测 DKA 患者不良结局方面表现良好,有助于个性化血糖管理,具有重要的临床应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Personalized glycemic management for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis based on machine learning].

Objective: To explore the optimal blood glucose-lowering strategies for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) to enhance personalized treatment effects using machine learning techniques based on the United States Critical Care Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care- IV (MIMIC- IV).

Methods: Utilizing the MIMIC- IV database, the case data of 2 096 patients with DKA admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008 to 2019 were analyzed. Machine learning models were developed, and receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) and precision-recall curve (PR curve) were plotted to evaluate the model's effectiveness in predicting four common adverse outcomes: hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, reductions in Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and extended hospital stays. The risk of adverse outcomes was analyzed in relation to the rate of blood glucose decrease. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between relevant factors and the risk of hypokalemia. Personalized risk interpretation methods and predictive technologies were applied to individualize the analysis of optimal glucose control ranges for patients.

Results: The machine learning models demonstrated excellent performance in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with DKA, with areas under the ROC curve (AUROC) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for predicting hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, GCS score reduction, and extended hospital stays being 0.826 (0.803-0.849), 0.850 (0.828-0.870), 0.925 (0.903-0.946), and 0.901 (0.883-0.920), respectively. Analysis of the relationship between the rate of blood glucose reduction and the risk of four adverse outcomes showed that a maximum glucose reduction rate > 6.26 mmol×L-1×h-1 significantly increased the risk of hypoglycemia (P < 0.001); a rate > 2.72 mmol×L-1×h-1 significantly elevated the risk of hypokalemia (P < 0.001); a rate > 5.53 mmol×L-1×h-1 significantly reduced the risk of GCS score reduction (P < 0.001); and a rate > 8.03 mmol×L-1×h-1 significantly shortened the length of hospital stay (P < 0.001). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated significant correlations between maximum bicarbonate levels, blood urea nitrogen levels, and total insulin doses with the risk of hypokalemia (all P < 0.01). In terms of establishing personalized optimal treatment thresholds, assuming optimal glucose reduction thresholds for hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, GCS score reduction, and extended hospital stay were x1, x2, x3, x4, respectively, the recommended glucose reduction rates to minimize the risks of hypokalemia and hypoglycemia should be ≤min{x1, x2}, while those to reduce GCS score decline and extended hospital stay should be ≥ max{x3, x4}. When these ranges overlap, i.e., max{x3, x4} ≤ min{x1, x2}, this interval was the recommended optimal glucose reduction range. If there was no overlap between these ranges, i.e., max{x3, x4} > min{x1, x2}, the treatment strategy should be dynamically adjusted considering individual differences in the risk of various adverse outcomes.

Conclusions: The machine learning models shows good performance in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with DKA, assisting in personalized blood glucose management and holding important clinical application prospects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信