神经创伤后血清神经丝轻链的测量结果 "的更正。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"神经创伤后血清神经丝轻链的测量结果 \"的更正。","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/jns.12642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wilcox M, Rayner MLD, Guillemot-Legris O, Platt I, Brown H, Quick T, Phillips JB Serum neurofilament light chain measurements following nerve trauma. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2023;28(3):500–507. doi:10.1111/jns.12576</p><p>There was an error in the analysis of serum NfL data that resulted in the values in Figure 1, Table 1 and Results being expressed incorrectly as 40-fold lower than their correct concentration. The ‘Serum NfL analysis’ section of the Methods should read ‘Serum NfL concentration was measured using the Simoa HD-X Analyser (Quanterix, Billerica, MA) with a Neurology 4-plex B kit (item number: 103345). All samples were randomised across the plates and run in duplicate. All samples measured were above the lower limit of detection (0.0962 pg/mL) with a mean coefficient of variation of 13.2% between duplicates. Intra- and inter-plate coefficients of variation, monitored using 2-4 pooled human internal control samples across each plate, were &lt;10%’. not ‘NfL levels in serum were measured using a SIMOA® SR-X analyser (Quanterix Corporation, Massachusetts) with a SIMOA® NF-light Advantage (SR-X) Kit (Quanterix, No. 103400) according to protocols well described elsewhere (O'Brien, et al., 2021). All samples were run in duplicate and analysers were blinded to the experimental conditions. All samples measured above the lower limit of detection (0.038 pg/mL) with a mean coefficient of variation of 9.15% between duplicates. Furthermore, two control samples were run on each place with a mean coefficient of variation of 6.90%’.</p><p>New versions of Figure 1 and Table 1 have been provided. In addition, the second line of the Results section should read 20.33 ± 8.98 pg/mL rather than 0.50 ± 0.2 pg/mL. The third line of the Discussion section should read 20 pg/mL rather than 0.50 pg/mL.</p><p>We apologise for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":17451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","volume":"29 3","pages":"376-377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jns.12642","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to ‘Serum neurofilament light chain measurements following nerve trauma’\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jns.12642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Wilcox M, Rayner MLD, Guillemot-Legris O, Platt I, Brown H, Quick T, Phillips JB Serum neurofilament light chain measurements following nerve trauma. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2023;28(3):500–507. doi:10.1111/jns.12576</p><p>There was an error in the analysis of serum NfL data that resulted in the values in Figure 1, Table 1 and Results being expressed incorrectly as 40-fold lower than their correct concentration. The ‘Serum NfL analysis’ section of the Methods should read ‘Serum NfL concentration was measured using the Simoa HD-X Analyser (Quanterix, Billerica, MA) with a Neurology 4-plex B kit (item number: 103345). All samples were randomised across the plates and run in duplicate. All samples measured were above the lower limit of detection (0.0962 pg/mL) with a mean coefficient of variation of 13.2% between duplicates. Intra- and inter-plate coefficients of variation, monitored using 2-4 pooled human internal control samples across each plate, were &lt;10%’. not ‘NfL levels in serum were measured using a SIMOA® SR-X analyser (Quanterix Corporation, Massachusetts) with a SIMOA® NF-light Advantage (SR-X) Kit (Quanterix, No. 103400) according to protocols well described elsewhere (O'Brien, et al., 2021). All samples were run in duplicate and analysers were blinded to the experimental conditions. All samples measured above the lower limit of detection (0.038 pg/mL) with a mean coefficient of variation of 9.15% between duplicates. Furthermore, two control samples were run on each place with a mean coefficient of variation of 6.90%’.</p><p>New versions of Figure 1 and Table 1 have been provided. In addition, the second line of the Results section should read 20.33 ± 8.98 pg/mL rather than 0.50 ± 0.2 pg/mL. The third line of the Discussion section should read 20 pg/mL rather than 0.50 pg/mL.</p><p>We apologise for this error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"376-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jns.12642\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jns.12642\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jns.12642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Wilcox M、Rayner MLD、Guillemot-Legris O、Platt I、Brown H、Quick T、Phillips JB 神经创伤后的血清神经丝轻链测量。J Peripher Nerv Syst.doi:10.1111/jns.12576在分析血清神经丝轻链数据时出现错误,导致图 1、表 1 和结果中的数值被错误地表示为比其正确浓度低 40 倍。方法》中的 "血清 NfL 分析 "部分应为 "使用 Simoa HD-X 分析仪(Quanterix, Billerica, MA)和神经学 4-plex B 试剂盒(货号:103345)测量血清 NfL 浓度。所有样品在平板上随机排列,一式两份。所有测定的样品均高于检测下限(0.0962 pg/mL),重复样品之间的平均变异系数为 13.2%。使用每个板上的 2-4 个集合人类内部对照样本监测板内和板间变异系数,结果均为 <10%'。而非'使用 SIMOA® SR-X 分析仪(Quanterix Corporation,马萨诸塞州)和 SIMOA® NF-light Advantage (SR-X) 试剂盒(Quanterix,编号 103400),按照其他地方详细描述的方案(O'Brien 等人,2021 年)测量血清中的 NfL 水平。所有样品均一式两份,分析人员对实验条件保密。所有样本的测量值均高于检测下限(0.038 pg/mL),重复样本之间的平均变异系数为 9.15%。图 1 和表 1 提供了新版本。此外,结果部分第二行应为 20.33 ± 8.98 pg/mL,而不是 0.50 ± 0.2 pg/mL。讨论部分第三行应为 20 pg/mL,而不是 0.50 pg/mL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Correction to ‘Serum neurofilament light chain measurements following nerve trauma’

Correction to ‘Serum neurofilament light chain measurements following nerve trauma’

Wilcox M, Rayner MLD, Guillemot-Legris O, Platt I, Brown H, Quick T, Phillips JB Serum neurofilament light chain measurements following nerve trauma. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2023;28(3):500–507. doi:10.1111/jns.12576

There was an error in the analysis of serum NfL data that resulted in the values in Figure 1, Table 1 and Results being expressed incorrectly as 40-fold lower than their correct concentration. The ‘Serum NfL analysis’ section of the Methods should read ‘Serum NfL concentration was measured using the Simoa HD-X Analyser (Quanterix, Billerica, MA) with a Neurology 4-plex B kit (item number: 103345). All samples were randomised across the plates and run in duplicate. All samples measured were above the lower limit of detection (0.0962 pg/mL) with a mean coefficient of variation of 13.2% between duplicates. Intra- and inter-plate coefficients of variation, monitored using 2-4 pooled human internal control samples across each plate, were <10%’. not ‘NfL levels in serum were measured using a SIMOA® SR-X analyser (Quanterix Corporation, Massachusetts) with a SIMOA® NF-light Advantage (SR-X) Kit (Quanterix, No. 103400) according to protocols well described elsewhere (O'Brien, et al., 2021). All samples were run in duplicate and analysers were blinded to the experimental conditions. All samples measured above the lower limit of detection (0.038 pg/mL) with a mean coefficient of variation of 9.15% between duplicates. Furthermore, two control samples were run on each place with a mean coefficient of variation of 6.90%’.

New versions of Figure 1 and Table 1 have been provided. In addition, the second line of the Results section should read 20.33 ± 8.98 pg/mL rather than 0.50 ± 0.2 pg/mL. The third line of the Discussion section should read 20 pg/mL rather than 0.50 pg/mL.

We apologise for this error.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is the official journal of the Peripheral Nerve Society. Founded in 1996, it is the scientific journal of choice for clinicians, clinical scientists and basic neuroscientists interested in all aspects of biology and clinical research of peripheral nervous system disorders. The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes high quality articles on cell and molecular biology, genomics, neuropathic pain, clinical research, trials, and unique case reports on inherited and acquired peripheral neuropathies. Original articles are organized according to the topic in one of four specific areas: Mechanisms of Disease, Genetics, Clinical Research, and Clinical Trials. The journal also publishes regular review papers on hot topics and Special Issues on basic, clinical, or assembled research in the field of peripheral nervous system disorders. Authors interested in contributing a review-type article or a Special Issue should contact the Editorial Office to discuss the scope of the proposed article with the Editor-in-Chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信