Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Modern Cinderella?

Purpose: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains a prominent global cause of mortality, with coronary artery disease representing its most prevalent manifestation. Recently, a novel class of antidiabetic medication, namely sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, has been reported to have remarkable cardiorenal advantages for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and they may reduce cardiorenal risk even in individuals without pre-existing DM. Currently, there is no evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of these drugs in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), regardless of diabetes status. This review aims to comprehensively present the available preclinical and clinical evidence regarding the potential role of SGLT2 inhibitors in the context of ACS, as adjuncts to standard-of-care treatment for this patient population, while also discussing potential short- and long-term cardiovascular benefits.

Methods: A literature search was performed through MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus until February 26, 2024. Eligible were preclinical and clinical studies, comprising randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world studies, and meta-analyses.

Findings: Evidence from preclinical models indicates that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with a blunted ischemia-reperfusion injury and decreased myocardial infarct size, particularly after prior treatment. Although RCTs and real-world data hint at a potential benefit in acute ischemic settings, showing improvements in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, decongestion, and various cardiometabolic parameters such as glycemia,body weight, and blood pressure, the recently published DAPA-MI (Dapagliflozin in Myocardial Infarction without Diabetes or Heart Failure) trial did not establish a clear advantage regarding surrogate cardiovascular end points of interest. SGLT2 inhibitors appear to provide a benefit in reducing contrast-induced acute kidney injury events in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, data on other safety concerns, such as treatment discontinuation because of hypotension, hypovolemia, or ketoacidosis, are currently limited.

Implications: Despite the well-established cardiovascular benefits observed in the general population with type 2 DM and, more recently, in other patient groups irrespective of diabetes status, existing evidence does not support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in the context of ACS. Definitive answers to this intriguing research question, which could potentially expand the therapeutic indications of this novel drug class, require large-scale, well-designed RCTs.