低辐射剂量率下的动脉速度定量数字减影血管造影测量。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Joseph F Whitehead, Carson A Hoffman, Martin G Wagner, Sarvesh Periyasamy, Ece Meram, Marlin E Keller, Michael A Speidel, Paul F Laeseke
{"title":"低辐射剂量率下的动脉速度定量数字减影血管造影测量。","authors":"Joseph F Whitehead, Carson A Hoffman, Martin G Wagner, Sarvesh Periyasamy, Ece Meram, Marlin E Keller, Michael A Speidel, Paul F Laeseke","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03809-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quantitative digital subtraction angiography (qDSA) has been proposed to quantify blood velocity for monitoring treatment progress during blood flow altering interventions. The method requires high frame rate imaging [~ 30 frame per second (fps)] to capture temporal dynamics. This work investigates performance of qDSA in low radiation dose acquisitions to facilitate clinical translation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Velocity quantification accuracy was evaluated at five radiation dose rates in vitro and in vivo. Angiographic technique ranged from 30 fps digital subtraction angiography ( <math><mrow><mn>29.3</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>1.7</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>mGy</mtext> <mo>/</mo> <mtext>s</mtext></mrow> </math> at the interventional reference point) down to a 30 fps protocol at 23% higher radiation dose per frame than fluoroscopy ( <math><mrow><mn>1.1</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>mGy</mtext> <mo>/</mo> <mtext>s</mtext></mrow> </math> ). The in vitro setup consisted of a 3D-printed model of a swine hepatic arterial tree connected to a pulsatile displacement pump. Five different flow rates (3.5-8.8 mL/s) were investigated in vitro. Angiography-based fluid velocity measurements were compared across dose rates using ANOVA and Bland-Altman analysis. The experiment was then repeated in a swine study (n = 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiation dose rate reductions for the lowest dose protocol were 99% and 96% for the phantom and swine study, respectively. No significant difference was found between angiography-based velocity measurements at different dose rates in vitro or in vivo. Bland-Altman analysis found little bias for all lower-dose protocols (range: [- 0.1, 0.1] cm/s), with the widest limits of agreement ([- 3.3, 3.5] cm/s) occurring at the lowest dose protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of quantitative blood velocity measurements from angiographic images acquired at reduced radiation dose rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Digital Subtraction Angiography Measurement of Arterial Velocity at Low Radiation Dose Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph F Whitehead, Carson A Hoffman, Martin G Wagner, Sarvesh Periyasamy, Ece Meram, Marlin E Keller, Michael A Speidel, Paul F Laeseke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00270-024-03809-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quantitative digital subtraction angiography (qDSA) has been proposed to quantify blood velocity for monitoring treatment progress during blood flow altering interventions. The method requires high frame rate imaging [~ 30 frame per second (fps)] to capture temporal dynamics. This work investigates performance of qDSA in low radiation dose acquisitions to facilitate clinical translation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Velocity quantification accuracy was evaluated at five radiation dose rates in vitro and in vivo. Angiographic technique ranged from 30 fps digital subtraction angiography ( <math><mrow><mn>29.3</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>1.7</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>mGy</mtext> <mo>/</mo> <mtext>s</mtext></mrow> </math> at the interventional reference point) down to a 30 fps protocol at 23% higher radiation dose per frame than fluoroscopy ( <math><mrow><mn>1.1</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>mGy</mtext> <mo>/</mo> <mtext>s</mtext></mrow> </math> ). The in vitro setup consisted of a 3D-printed model of a swine hepatic arterial tree connected to a pulsatile displacement pump. Five different flow rates (3.5-8.8 mL/s) were investigated in vitro. Angiography-based fluid velocity measurements were compared across dose rates using ANOVA and Bland-Altman analysis. The experiment was then repeated in a swine study (n = 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiation dose rate reductions for the lowest dose protocol were 99% and 96% for the phantom and swine study, respectively. No significant difference was found between angiography-based velocity measurements at different dose rates in vitro or in vivo. Bland-Altman analysis found little bias for all lower-dose protocols (range: [- 0.1, 0.1] cm/s), with the widest limits of agreement ([- 3.3, 3.5] cm/s) occurring at the lowest dose protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of quantitative blood velocity measurements from angiographic images acquired at reduced radiation dose rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03809-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03809-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:定量数字减影血管造影术(qDSA)被提出来量化血流速度,以便在改变血流的干预过程中监测治疗进展。该方法需要高帧率成像[~每秒 30 帧 (fps)]来捕捉时间动态。这项工作研究了 qDSA 在低辐射剂量采集中的性能,以促进临床转化:对体外和体内五种辐射剂量率下的速度量化准确性进行了评估。血管造影技术的范围从 30 fps 数字减影血管造影(介入参考点为 29.3 ± 1.7 mGy /s)到每帧辐射剂量比透视(1.1 ± 0.2 mGy /s)高 23% 的 30 fps 方案。体外装置包括一个连接到脉冲位移泵的猪肝动脉树 3D 打印模型。体外研究了五种不同的流速(3.5-8.8 mL/s)。使用方差分析和布兰-阿尔特曼分析比较了不同剂量率下基于血管造影的流体速度测量结果。然后在猪研究中重复该实验(n = 4):结果:在模型和猪的研究中,最低剂量方案的辐射剂量率降低率分别为 99% 和 96%。体外和体内不同剂量率下基于血管造影的速度测量结果没有明显差异。Bland-Altman分析发现,所有低剂量方案的偏差都很小(范围:[- 0.1, 0.1] cm/s),最低剂量方案的一致性范围最广([- 3.3, 3.5] cm/s):这项研究证明了在辐射剂量率降低的情况下通过血管造影图像进行定量血流速度测量的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantitative Digital Subtraction Angiography Measurement of Arterial Velocity at Low Radiation Dose Rates.

Quantitative Digital Subtraction Angiography Measurement of Arterial Velocity at Low Radiation Dose Rates.

Purpose: Quantitative digital subtraction angiography (qDSA) has been proposed to quantify blood velocity for monitoring treatment progress during blood flow altering interventions. The method requires high frame rate imaging [~ 30 frame per second (fps)] to capture temporal dynamics. This work investigates performance of qDSA in low radiation dose acquisitions to facilitate clinical translation.

Materials and methods: Velocity quantification accuracy was evaluated at five radiation dose rates in vitro and in vivo. Angiographic technique ranged from 30 fps digital subtraction angiography ( 29.3 ± 1.7 mGy / s at the interventional reference point) down to a 30 fps protocol at 23% higher radiation dose per frame than fluoroscopy ( 1.1 ± 0.2 mGy / s ). The in vitro setup consisted of a 3D-printed model of a swine hepatic arterial tree connected to a pulsatile displacement pump. Five different flow rates (3.5-8.8 mL/s) were investigated in vitro. Angiography-based fluid velocity measurements were compared across dose rates using ANOVA and Bland-Altman analysis. The experiment was then repeated in a swine study (n = 4).

Results: Radiation dose rate reductions for the lowest dose protocol were 99% and 96% for the phantom and swine study, respectively. No significant difference was found between angiography-based velocity measurements at different dose rates in vitro or in vivo. Bland-Altman analysis found little bias for all lower-dose protocols (range: [- 0.1, 0.1] cm/s), with the widest limits of agreement ([- 3.3, 3.5] cm/s) occurring at the lowest dose protocol.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of quantitative blood velocity measurements from angiographic images acquired at reduced radiation dose rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信