Ágnes Backhausz, Edit Bognár, Villő Csiszár, Damján Tárkányi, András Zempléni
{"title":"用经典方法和机器学习方法估计双层随机图中流行病传播的参数","authors":"Ágnes Backhausz, Edit Bognár, Villő Csiszár, Damján Tárkányi, András Zempléni","doi":"arxiv-2407.07118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our main goal in this paper is to quantitatively compare the performance of\nclassical methods to XGBoost and convolutional neural networks in a parameter\nestimation problem for epidemic spread. As we use flexible two-layer random\ngraphs as the underlying network, we can also study how much the structure of\nthe graphs in the training set and the test set can differ while to get a\nreasonably good estimate. In addition, we also examine whether additional\ninformation (such as the average degree of infected vertices) can help\nimproving the results, compared to the case when we only know the time series\nconsisting of the number of susceptible and infected individuals. Our\nsimulation results also show which methods are most accurate in the different\nphases of the epidemic.","PeriodicalId":501044,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","volume":"28 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parameter estimation of epidemic spread in two-layer random graphs by classical and machine learning methods\",\"authors\":\"Ágnes Backhausz, Edit Bognár, Villő Csiszár, Damján Tárkányi, András Zempléni\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.07118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our main goal in this paper is to quantitatively compare the performance of\\nclassical methods to XGBoost and convolutional neural networks in a parameter\\nestimation problem for epidemic spread. As we use flexible two-layer random\\ngraphs as the underlying network, we can also study how much the structure of\\nthe graphs in the training set and the test set can differ while to get a\\nreasonably good estimate. In addition, we also examine whether additional\\ninformation (such as the average degree of infected vertices) can help\\nimproving the results, compared to the case when we only know the time series\\nconsisting of the number of susceptible and infected individuals. Our\\nsimulation results also show which methods are most accurate in the different\\nphases of the epidemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"28 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.07118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.07118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parameter estimation of epidemic spread in two-layer random graphs by classical and machine learning methods
Our main goal in this paper is to quantitatively compare the performance of
classical methods to XGBoost and convolutional neural networks in a parameter
estimation problem for epidemic spread. As we use flexible two-layer random
graphs as the underlying network, we can also study how much the structure of
the graphs in the training set and the test set can differ while to get a
reasonably good estimate. In addition, we also examine whether additional
information (such as the average degree of infected vertices) can help
improving the results, compared to the case when we only know the time series
consisting of the number of susceptible and infected individuals. Our
simulation results also show which methods are most accurate in the different
phases of the epidemic.