Yuan-Qiao Li, Min Lin, Li-Jun Xu, Rui Luo, Yu-He Zhang, Qian-Xi Ni, Yun-Tao Liu
{"title":"评估表面发射率测量不确定性的蒙特卡罗方法","authors":"Yuan-Qiao Li, Min Lin, Li-Jun Xu, Rui Luo, Yu-He Zhang, Qian-Xi Ni, Yun-Tao Liu","doi":"10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the uncertainty of <span>\\(2\\pi \\alpha \\)</span> and <span>\\(2\\pi \\beta \\)</span> surface emission rates using the windowless multiwire proportional counter method. This study used the Monte Carlo method (MCM) to validate the conventional Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) method. A dead time measurement model for the two-source method was established based on the characteristics of a single-channel measurement system, and the voltage threshold correction factor measurement function was indirectly obtained by fitting the threshold correction curve. The uncertainty in the surface emission rate was calculated using the GUM method and the law of propagation of uncertainty. The MCM provided clear definitions for each input quantity and its uncertainty distribution, and the simulation training was realized with a complete and complex mathematical model. The results of the surface emission rate uncertainty evaluation for four radioactive plane sources using both methods showed the uncertainty’s consistency <span>\\(E_\\text {n} < 0.070\\)</span> for the comparison of each source, and the uncertainty results of the GUM were all lower than those of the MCM. However, the MCM has a more objective evaluation process and can serve as a validation tool for GUM results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19177,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Science and Techniques","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monte Carlo method for evaluation of surface emission rate measurement uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Yuan-Qiao Li, Min Lin, Li-Jun Xu, Rui Luo, Yu-He Zhang, Qian-Xi Ni, Yun-Tao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the uncertainty of <span>\\\\(2\\\\pi \\\\alpha \\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(2\\\\pi \\\\beta \\\\)</span> surface emission rates using the windowless multiwire proportional counter method. This study used the Monte Carlo method (MCM) to validate the conventional Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) method. A dead time measurement model for the two-source method was established based on the characteristics of a single-channel measurement system, and the voltage threshold correction factor measurement function was indirectly obtained by fitting the threshold correction curve. The uncertainty in the surface emission rate was calculated using the GUM method and the law of propagation of uncertainty. The MCM provided clear definitions for each input quantity and its uncertainty distribution, and the simulation training was realized with a complete and complex mathematical model. The results of the surface emission rate uncertainty evaluation for four radioactive plane sources using both methods showed the uncertainty’s consistency <span>\\\\(E_\\\\text {n} < 0.070\\\\)</span> for the comparison of each source, and the uncertainty results of the GUM were all lower than those of the MCM. However, the MCM has a more objective evaluation process and can serve as a validation tool for GUM results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Science and Techniques\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Science and Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Science and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monte Carlo method for evaluation of surface emission rate measurement uncertainty
The aim of this study is to evaluate the uncertainty of \(2\pi \alpha \) and \(2\pi \beta \) surface emission rates using the windowless multiwire proportional counter method. This study used the Monte Carlo method (MCM) to validate the conventional Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) method. A dead time measurement model for the two-source method was established based on the characteristics of a single-channel measurement system, and the voltage threshold correction factor measurement function was indirectly obtained by fitting the threshold correction curve. The uncertainty in the surface emission rate was calculated using the GUM method and the law of propagation of uncertainty. The MCM provided clear definitions for each input quantity and its uncertainty distribution, and the simulation training was realized with a complete and complex mathematical model. The results of the surface emission rate uncertainty evaluation for four radioactive plane sources using both methods showed the uncertainty’s consistency \(E_\text {n} < 0.070\) for the comparison of each source, and the uncertainty results of the GUM were all lower than those of the MCM. However, the MCM has a more objective evaluation process and can serve as a validation tool for GUM results.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Science and Techniques (NST) reports scientific findings, technical advances and important results in the fields of nuclear science and techniques. The aim of this periodical is to stimulate cross-fertilization of knowledge among scientists and engineers working in the fields of nuclear research.
Scope covers the following subjects:
• Synchrotron radiation applications, beamline technology;
• Accelerator, ray technology and applications;
• Nuclear chemistry, radiochemistry, radiopharmaceuticals, nuclear medicine;
• Nuclear electronics and instrumentation;
• Nuclear physics and interdisciplinary research;
• Nuclear energy science and engineering.