怀着最美好的愿望:Lucinda Mosher、Elinor J. Pierce 和 Or N. Rose 编著的《宗教间的失足与错误》(评论)

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Daniel F. Polish
{"title":"怀着最美好的愿望:Lucinda Mosher、Elinor J. Pierce 和 Or N. Rose 编著的《宗教间的失足与错误》(评论)","authors":"Daniel F. Polish","doi":"10.1353/ecu.2024.a931521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>With the Best of Intentions: Interreligious Missteps and Mistakes</em> ed. by Lucinda Mosher, Elinor J. Pierce, and Or N. Rose <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Daniel F. Polish </li> </ul> <em>With the Best of Intentions: Interreligious Missteps and Mistakes</em>. Edited by Lucinda Mosher, Elinor J. Pierce, and Or N. Rose. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2023. Pp. 240. $35.00, paper. <p>A radio advertisement that plays with annoying regularity talks about how the advertised product can help us overcome our distress at being awakened in the middle of the night by recollections of our social blunders. Clearly, the ad is predicated on the reality that all of us are finite, fallible, and prone to mistakes. It is a truth that extends to every aspect of our lives. This book addresses the mistakes that people have made and can make—and can learn from—in our engagement in interreligious settings and interfaith dialogue. Each reader can recount their own litany of tales about the gaffes, inadvertent slights, and embarrassing remarks that they have witnessed, participated in, or committed. I still cringe at the recollection of the lovely buffet that was offered at a Muslin-Jewish colloquy—during Ramadan. Given the humanity of all of us who participate in one form of interreligious work, such \"missteps\" are inevitable. The book is made up of a series of short articles in which the authors discuss their own experiences of what we would call mistakes and the lessons they learned from them.</p> <p>The subtext of the book is that such mistakes are almost inevitable. After all, as Anthony Cruz Pantojas reminds us, \"Interreligious work requires us to be present with and to probe the uncomfortable, the unfamiliar, and messy terrain of difference.\" As Christopher Leighton puts it, \"In the jumble of the dance, we get close to one another. I do not know how to avoid mangled toes.\" For people new to working in interreligious settings, the apprehension of saying, or doing, the wrong thing may be intimidating, even petrifying. Yet, as Hans Gustafson teaches, that should not inhibit us from the work: \"In spaces of intentional collaborative interfaith encounter striving to form relationships across differences <strong>[End Page 283]</strong> in service of common aims and goods, effective and authentic leaders emerge by taking risks, being vulnerable with their (non)religious values, visions, and practices, and by trusting others to accept them for who they are today.\"</p> <p>Mistakes are seen as a positive opportunity for participants to learn and to grow. We are encouraged not to be over-polite. Instead, we are challenged to make mistakes rather than shrink from them, since our mistakes offer us the opportunity to engage in real dialogue. Heather Miller Rubens looks at one particular experience and advises, \"We did not give ourselves enough time and moved too quickly [from the experience]. Creating friendships, building trust, and gaining new literacy (both learning and unlearning) are slow work.\" The book contains, as well, suggestions for how to avoid some more common errors. One idea repeated frequently is that \"Religions don't meet. People do.\" A corollary to that is that none of the people we meet represent or embody the tradition from which they come. Each of us appropriates our tradition in our own way. This is put succinctly by Rachel Mikva: \"The most obvious strategy … is to ask questions. Invite people's stories. Model how to speak <em>within</em> rather than <em>for</em> … a religious tradition.\"</p> <p>The book makes especially useful reading for people considering, or new to, working in interreligious settings or engaging interfaith dialogue. Some of the chapters are engaging vignettes of the author's own experience, while a few seem more tangential and less germane accounts of the author's projects than reflections on the subject of the volume—and some reflect deeply on the complexities introduced into the dialogue by the political realities of the Israel-Palestine conflict, a subject that seems tragically relevant and profoundly challenging at this moment. Those chapters are even more compelling now than when they were written.</p> Daniel F. Polish Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY Copyright © 2024 Journal of Ecumenical Studies ... </p>","PeriodicalId":43047,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"With the Best of Intentions: Interreligious Missteps and Mistakes ed. by Lucinda Mosher, Elinor J. Pierce, and Or N. Rose (review)\",\"authors\":\"Daniel F. Polish\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ecu.2024.a931521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>With the Best of Intentions: Interreligious Missteps and Mistakes</em> ed. by Lucinda Mosher, Elinor J. Pierce, and Or N. Rose <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Daniel F. Polish </li> </ul> <em>With the Best of Intentions: Interreligious Missteps and Mistakes</em>. Edited by Lucinda Mosher, Elinor J. Pierce, and Or N. Rose. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2023. Pp. 240. $35.00, paper. <p>A radio advertisement that plays with annoying regularity talks about how the advertised product can help us overcome our distress at being awakened in the middle of the night by recollections of our social blunders. Clearly, the ad is predicated on the reality that all of us are finite, fallible, and prone to mistakes. It is a truth that extends to every aspect of our lives. This book addresses the mistakes that people have made and can make—and can learn from—in our engagement in interreligious settings and interfaith dialogue. Each reader can recount their own litany of tales about the gaffes, inadvertent slights, and embarrassing remarks that they have witnessed, participated in, or committed. I still cringe at the recollection of the lovely buffet that was offered at a Muslin-Jewish colloquy—during Ramadan. Given the humanity of all of us who participate in one form of interreligious work, such \\\"missteps\\\" are inevitable. The book is made up of a series of short articles in which the authors discuss their own experiences of what we would call mistakes and the lessons they learned from them.</p> <p>The subtext of the book is that such mistakes are almost inevitable. After all, as Anthony Cruz Pantojas reminds us, \\\"Interreligious work requires us to be present with and to probe the uncomfortable, the unfamiliar, and messy terrain of difference.\\\" As Christopher Leighton puts it, \\\"In the jumble of the dance, we get close to one another. I do not know how to avoid mangled toes.\\\" For people new to working in interreligious settings, the apprehension of saying, or doing, the wrong thing may be intimidating, even petrifying. Yet, as Hans Gustafson teaches, that should not inhibit us from the work: \\\"In spaces of intentional collaborative interfaith encounter striving to form relationships across differences <strong>[End Page 283]</strong> in service of common aims and goods, effective and authentic leaders emerge by taking risks, being vulnerable with their (non)religious values, visions, and practices, and by trusting others to accept them for who they are today.\\\"</p> <p>Mistakes are seen as a positive opportunity for participants to learn and to grow. We are encouraged not to be over-polite. Instead, we are challenged to make mistakes rather than shrink from them, since our mistakes offer us the opportunity to engage in real dialogue. Heather Miller Rubens looks at one particular experience and advises, \\\"We did not give ourselves enough time and moved too quickly [from the experience]. Creating friendships, building trust, and gaining new literacy (both learning and unlearning) are slow work.\\\" The book contains, as well, suggestions for how to avoid some more common errors. One idea repeated frequently is that \\\"Religions don't meet. People do.\\\" A corollary to that is that none of the people we meet represent or embody the tradition from which they come. Each of us appropriates our tradition in our own way. This is put succinctly by Rachel Mikva: \\\"The most obvious strategy … is to ask questions. Invite people's stories. Model how to speak <em>within</em> rather than <em>for</em> … a religious tradition.\\\"</p> <p>The book makes especially useful reading for people considering, or new to, working in interreligious settings or engaging interfaith dialogue. Some of the chapters are engaging vignettes of the author's own experience, while a few seem more tangential and less germane accounts of the author's projects than reflections on the subject of the volume—and some reflect deeply on the complexities introduced into the dialogue by the political realities of the Israel-Palestine conflict, a subject that seems tragically relevant and profoundly challenging at this moment. Those chapters are even more compelling now than when they were written.</p> Daniel F. Polish Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY Copyright © 2024 Journal of Ecumenical Studies ... </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2024.a931521\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2024.a931521","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 怀着最美好的愿望:由 Lucinda Mosher、Elinor J. Pierce 和 Or N. Rose 编辑 Daniel F. Polish With the Best of Intentions:宗教间的失足与错误。由 Lucinda Mosher、Elinor J. Pierce 和 Or N. Rose 编辑。纽约州马利诺:Orbis Books, 2023。第 240 页。35.00 美元,纸质。一则令人讨厌的广播广告经常播放,讲述广告中的产品如何帮助我们克服半夜被社交失误的回忆惊醒的苦恼。显然,这则广告是基于这样一个现实:我们每个人都是有限的、容易犯错的。这个事实延伸到我们生活的方方面面。本书论述了人们在宗教间环境和宗教间对话中曾经犯过、可能犯的错误,以及可以从中吸取的教训。每一位读者都可以讲述自己目睹、参与或犯下的一连串口误、无心的轻视和令人尴尬的言论。回想起斋月期间在一次穆斯林与犹太教的座谈会上提供的美味自助餐,我至今仍心有余悸。鉴于我们所有参与某种形式宗教间工作的人都具有人性,这种 "失足 "在所难免。本书由一系列短文组成,作者们在这些短文中讨论了自己的所谓失误经历以及从中汲取的教训。这本书的潜台词是,这些错误几乎是不可避免的。毕竟,正如安东尼-克鲁斯-潘托哈斯(Anthony Cruz Pantojas)提醒我们的那样,"宗教间工作要求我们与不舒服、不熟悉和混乱的差异地带同在,并进行探索"。正如克里斯托弗-莱顿(Christopher Leighton)所说:"在杂乱无章的舞蹈中,我们彼此靠近。我不知道怎样才能避免脚趾受伤"。对于刚开始在宗教间环境中工作的人来说,担心说错话或做错事可能会让他们感到害怕,甚至恐惧。然而,正如汉斯-古斯塔夫森(Hans Gustafson)所教导的那样,这不应该妨碍我们的工作:"在有意合作的宗教间相遇的空间里,为了服务于共同的目标和利益,努力形成跨越差异的关系 [结束语 第 283 页],通过承担风险、以脆弱的方式对待自己的(非)宗教价值观、愿景和实践,以及通过信任他人接受今天的自己,有效而真实的领导者就会出现。错误被视为参与者学习和成长的良机。我们鼓励大家不要过于客气。相反,我们要勇于犯错,而不是畏缩不前,因为我们的错误为我们提供了参与真正对话的机会。希瑟-米勒-鲁本斯(Heather Miller Rubens)回顾了一次特殊的经历,并建议说:"我们没有给自己足够的时间,[从这次经历中]走得太快了。建立友谊、建立信任和获得新的素养(学习和不学习)都是缓慢的工作"。书中还就如何避免一些更常见的错误提出了建议。一个经常重复的观点是:"宗教不会相遇。人们会"。由此推论,我们遇到的人都不代表或体现他们所来自的传统。我们每个人都以自己的方式占有我们的传统。瑞秋-米克瓦简明扼要地阐述了这一点:"最明显的策略......就是提问。邀请人们讲述自己的故事。示范如何在宗教传统内而不是为......宗教传统说话"。对于考虑在宗教间环境中工作或参与宗教间对话的人或新手来说,这本书是特别有用的读物。其中一些章节是作者亲身经历的引人入胜的小故事,而另一些章节似乎更多的是作者项目的切入点和不那么切题的叙述,而不是对本卷主题的反思--其中一些章节深刻反思了以色列-巴勒斯坦冲突的政治现实给对话带来的复杂性,这一主题在此刻似乎具有悲剧性的相关性和深刻的挑战性。现在看来,这些章节比写作时更加引人入胜。纽约州波基普西马里斯特学院,丹尼尔-波兰(Daniel F. Polish Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY)版权所有© 2024 年《普世研究杂志》......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
With the Best of Intentions: Interreligious Missteps and Mistakes ed. by Lucinda Mosher, Elinor J. Pierce, and Or N. Rose (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • With the Best of Intentions: Interreligious Missteps and Mistakes ed. by Lucinda Mosher, Elinor J. Pierce, and Or N. Rose
  • Daniel F. Polish
With the Best of Intentions: Interreligious Missteps and Mistakes. Edited by Lucinda Mosher, Elinor J. Pierce, and Or N. Rose. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2023. Pp. 240. $35.00, paper.

A radio advertisement that plays with annoying regularity talks about how the advertised product can help us overcome our distress at being awakened in the middle of the night by recollections of our social blunders. Clearly, the ad is predicated on the reality that all of us are finite, fallible, and prone to mistakes. It is a truth that extends to every aspect of our lives. This book addresses the mistakes that people have made and can make—and can learn from—in our engagement in interreligious settings and interfaith dialogue. Each reader can recount their own litany of tales about the gaffes, inadvertent slights, and embarrassing remarks that they have witnessed, participated in, or committed. I still cringe at the recollection of the lovely buffet that was offered at a Muslin-Jewish colloquy—during Ramadan. Given the humanity of all of us who participate in one form of interreligious work, such "missteps" are inevitable. The book is made up of a series of short articles in which the authors discuss their own experiences of what we would call mistakes and the lessons they learned from them.

The subtext of the book is that such mistakes are almost inevitable. After all, as Anthony Cruz Pantojas reminds us, "Interreligious work requires us to be present with and to probe the uncomfortable, the unfamiliar, and messy terrain of difference." As Christopher Leighton puts it, "In the jumble of the dance, we get close to one another. I do not know how to avoid mangled toes." For people new to working in interreligious settings, the apprehension of saying, or doing, the wrong thing may be intimidating, even petrifying. Yet, as Hans Gustafson teaches, that should not inhibit us from the work: "In spaces of intentional collaborative interfaith encounter striving to form relationships across differences [End Page 283] in service of common aims and goods, effective and authentic leaders emerge by taking risks, being vulnerable with their (non)religious values, visions, and practices, and by trusting others to accept them for who they are today."

Mistakes are seen as a positive opportunity for participants to learn and to grow. We are encouraged not to be over-polite. Instead, we are challenged to make mistakes rather than shrink from them, since our mistakes offer us the opportunity to engage in real dialogue. Heather Miller Rubens looks at one particular experience and advises, "We did not give ourselves enough time and moved too quickly [from the experience]. Creating friendships, building trust, and gaining new literacy (both learning and unlearning) are slow work." The book contains, as well, suggestions for how to avoid some more common errors. One idea repeated frequently is that "Religions don't meet. People do." A corollary to that is that none of the people we meet represent or embody the tradition from which they come. Each of us appropriates our tradition in our own way. This is put succinctly by Rachel Mikva: "The most obvious strategy … is to ask questions. Invite people's stories. Model how to speak within rather than for … a religious tradition."

The book makes especially useful reading for people considering, or new to, working in interreligious settings or engaging interfaith dialogue. Some of the chapters are engaging vignettes of the author's own experience, while a few seem more tangential and less germane accounts of the author's projects than reflections on the subject of the volume—and some reflect deeply on the complexities introduced into the dialogue by the political realities of the Israel-Palestine conflict, a subject that seems tragically relevant and profoundly challenging at this moment. Those chapters are even more compelling now than when they were written.

Daniel F. Polish Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY Copyright © 2024 Journal of Ecumenical Studies ...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信