社交机器人对我有好处,但对其他人更好:社交机器人感知的假定增强效应

Xun Sunny Liu , Jeff Hancock
{"title":"社交机器人对我有好处,但对其他人更好:社交机器人感知的假定增强效应","authors":"Xun Sunny Liu ,&nbsp;Jeff Hancock","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research proposes and investigates <em>the presumed allo-enhancement effect of social robot perceptions</em>, a tendency for individuals to view social robots as more beneficial for others than for themselves. We discuss this as a systematic bias in the perception of the utility of social robots. Through two survey studies, we test and replicate self-other perceptual differences, obtain effect sizes of these perceptual differences, and trace the impact of this presumed allo-enhancement effect on individuals' attitudes and behaviors. Analyses revealed strong perceptual differences, where individuals consistently believed social robots to be more enhancing for others than for themselves (<em>d</em> = −0.69, <em>d</em> = −0.62). These perceptual differences predicted individuals’ attitudes and endorsed behaviors towards social robots. By identifying this bias, we offer a new theoretical lens for understanding how people perceive and respond to emergent technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000392/pdfft?md5=192859a1c7d543cc91e3db4bc01c149c&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000392-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social robots are good for me, but better for other people:The presumed allo-enhancement effect of social robot perceptions\",\"authors\":\"Xun Sunny Liu ,&nbsp;Jeff Hancock\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research proposes and investigates <em>the presumed allo-enhancement effect of social robot perceptions</em>, a tendency for individuals to view social robots as more beneficial for others than for themselves. We discuss this as a systematic bias in the perception of the utility of social robots. Through two survey studies, we test and replicate self-other perceptual differences, obtain effect sizes of these perceptual differences, and trace the impact of this presumed allo-enhancement effect on individuals' attitudes and behaviors. Analyses revealed strong perceptual differences, where individuals consistently believed social robots to be more enhancing for others than for themselves (<em>d</em> = −0.69, <em>d</em> = −0.62). These perceptual differences predicted individuals’ attitudes and endorsed behaviors towards social robots. By identifying this bias, we offer a new theoretical lens for understanding how people perceive and respond to emergent technologies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000392/pdfft?md5=192859a1c7d543cc91e3db4bc01c149c&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000392-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出并调查了社交机器人感知的假定异体增强效应,即个人倾向于认为社交机器人对他人比对自己更有益。我们将其视为社交机器人效用认知中的一种系统性偏差。通过两项调查研究,我们测试并复制了自我与他人的感知差异,获得了这些感知差异的效应大小,并追踪了这种假定的异体增强效应对个人态度和行为的影响。分析表明,个体始终认为社交机器人对他人的增强作用大于对自己的增强作用(d = -0.69,d = -0.62),这种感知差异非常明显。这些感知差异预测了个体对社交机器人的态度和认可行为。通过识别这种偏差,我们为理解人们如何感知和应对新兴技术提供了一个新的理论视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social robots are good for me, but better for other people:The presumed allo-enhancement effect of social robot perceptions

This research proposes and investigates the presumed allo-enhancement effect of social robot perceptions, a tendency for individuals to view social robots as more beneficial for others than for themselves. We discuss this as a systematic bias in the perception of the utility of social robots. Through two survey studies, we test and replicate self-other perceptual differences, obtain effect sizes of these perceptual differences, and trace the impact of this presumed allo-enhancement effect on individuals' attitudes and behaviors. Analyses revealed strong perceptual differences, where individuals consistently believed social robots to be more enhancing for others than for themselves (d = −0.69, d = −0.62). These perceptual differences predicted individuals’ attitudes and endorsed behaviors towards social robots. By identifying this bias, we offer a new theoretical lens for understanding how people perceive and respond to emergent technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信