{"title":"依库珠单抗治疗格林-巴利综合征的有效性和安全性:3期多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。","authors":"Satoshi Kuwabara, Susumu Kusunoki, Motoi Kuwahara, Yoshihisa Yamano, Yoichiro Nishida, Hirokazu Ishida, Tomoyuki Kasuya, Erik Kupperman, Qun Lin, Glen Frick, Sonoko Misawa","doi":"10.1111/jns.12646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute, self-limited, immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy. Current treatments for GBS include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange, which may not sufficiently benefit severely affected patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab add-on therapy to IVIg (standard-of-care treatment) in patients with severe GBS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT04752566), enrolled Japanese adults (age ≥ 18 years) with severe GBS (Hughes functional grade [FG] score FG3 or FG4/FG5 within 2 weeks of onset of GBS). Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous infusion of eculizumab or placebo (once weekly for 4 weeks) with IVIg treatment with 20 weeks of follow-up. Primary efficacy endpoint was the time to first reach FG score ≤1 (able to run). Key secondary endpoints were proportion of participants achieving FG ≤1 at weeks 8 and 24 and FG improvement ≥3 at week 24. Pharmacodynamic analysis of serum free C5 concentration over time was performed. Safety was evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis included 57 participants (eculizumab, <i>n</i> = 37; placebo, <i>n</i> = 20). Primary endpoint was not achieved (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.45–1.97; <i>p</i> = .89). Key secondary endpoints did not reach statistical significance. Serum C5 concentration was reduced by 99.99% at 1 h postdose and sustained to week 5 but returned to baseline at the end of follow-up period. No new safety signals for eculizumab were identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>Although well tolerated, eculizumab treatment did not show significant effects on motor function recovery compared to placebo in patients with GBS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","volume":"29 3","pages":"339-349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jns.12646","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of eculizumab in Guillain-Barré syndrome: A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Kuwabara, Susumu Kusunoki, Motoi Kuwahara, Yoshihisa Yamano, Yoichiro Nishida, Hirokazu Ishida, Tomoyuki Kasuya, Erik Kupperman, Qun Lin, Glen Frick, Sonoko Misawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jns.12646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute, self-limited, immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy. Current treatments for GBS include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange, which may not sufficiently benefit severely affected patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab add-on therapy to IVIg (standard-of-care treatment) in patients with severe GBS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT04752566), enrolled Japanese adults (age ≥ 18 years) with severe GBS (Hughes functional grade [FG] score FG3 or FG4/FG5 within 2 weeks of onset of GBS). Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous infusion of eculizumab or placebo (once weekly for 4 weeks) with IVIg treatment with 20 weeks of follow-up. Primary efficacy endpoint was the time to first reach FG score ≤1 (able to run). Key secondary endpoints were proportion of participants achieving FG ≤1 at weeks 8 and 24 and FG improvement ≥3 at week 24. Pharmacodynamic analysis of serum free C5 concentration over time was performed. Safety was evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The analysis included 57 participants (eculizumab, <i>n</i> = 37; placebo, <i>n</i> = 20). Primary endpoint was not achieved (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.45–1.97; <i>p</i> = .89). Key secondary endpoints did not reach statistical significance. Serum C5 concentration was reduced by 99.99% at 1 h postdose and sustained to week 5 but returned to baseline at the end of follow-up period. No new safety signals for eculizumab were identified.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although well tolerated, eculizumab treatment did not show significant effects on motor function recovery compared to placebo in patients with GBS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"339-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jns.12646\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jns.12646\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jns.12646","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of eculizumab in Guillain-Barré syndrome: A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial
Background and Aims
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute, self-limited, immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy. Current treatments for GBS include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange, which may not sufficiently benefit severely affected patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab add-on therapy to IVIg (standard-of-care treatment) in patients with severe GBS.
Methods
This phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT04752566), enrolled Japanese adults (age ≥ 18 years) with severe GBS (Hughes functional grade [FG] score FG3 or FG4/FG5 within 2 weeks of onset of GBS). Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous infusion of eculizumab or placebo (once weekly for 4 weeks) with IVIg treatment with 20 weeks of follow-up. Primary efficacy endpoint was the time to first reach FG score ≤1 (able to run). Key secondary endpoints were proportion of participants achieving FG ≤1 at weeks 8 and 24 and FG improvement ≥3 at week 24. Pharmacodynamic analysis of serum free C5 concentration over time was performed. Safety was evaluated.
Results
The analysis included 57 participants (eculizumab, n = 37; placebo, n = 20). Primary endpoint was not achieved (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.45–1.97; p = .89). Key secondary endpoints did not reach statistical significance. Serum C5 concentration was reduced by 99.99% at 1 h postdose and sustained to week 5 but returned to baseline at the end of follow-up period. No new safety signals for eculizumab were identified.
Interpretation
Although well tolerated, eculizumab treatment did not show significant effects on motor function recovery compared to placebo in patients with GBS.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is the official journal of the Peripheral Nerve Society. Founded in 1996, it is the scientific journal of choice for clinicians, clinical scientists and basic neuroscientists interested in all aspects of biology and clinical research of peripheral nervous system disorders.
The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes high quality articles on cell and molecular biology, genomics, neuropathic pain, clinical research, trials, and unique case reports on inherited and acquired peripheral neuropathies.
Original articles are organized according to the topic in one of four specific areas: Mechanisms of Disease, Genetics, Clinical Research, and Clinical Trials.
The journal also publishes regular review papers on hot topics and Special Issues on basic, clinical, or assembled research in the field of peripheral nervous system disorders. Authors interested in contributing a review-type article or a Special Issue should contact the Editorial Office to discuss the scope of the proposed article with the Editor-in-Chief.