基于实时用药监测的数字依从性工具对艾滋病病毒感染者坚持抗逆转录病毒治疗和病毒抑制的影响:系统性文献综述与元分析》。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Takondwa Charles Msosa, Iraseni Swai, Rob Aarnoutse, Tobias F Rinke de Wit, Kennedy Ngowi, Chisomo Msefula, Marriott Nliwasa, Marion Sumari-de Boer
{"title":"基于实时用药监测的数字依从性工具对艾滋病病毒感染者坚持抗逆转录病毒治疗和病毒抑制的影响:系统性文献综述与元分析》。","authors":"Takondwa Charles Msosa, Iraseni Swai, Rob Aarnoutse, Tobias F Rinke de Wit, Kennedy Ngowi, Chisomo Msefula, Marriott Nliwasa, Marion Sumari-de Boer","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to improved treatment outcomes in persons living with HIV. Adherence to ART is required to achieve viral suppression. Real-time medication monitoring (RTMM)-based digital adherence tools (DATs) could be effective in improving ART adherence and viral suppression in persons living with HIV.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary and secondary objectives of this review were to assess the effect of RTMM-based DATs on improving ART adherence and viral load suppression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health for publications published through October 11, 2022. Narrative synthesis and random effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 638 papers identified, 8 were included. Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 2 were cohort studies. Two studies, an RCT in China (mean adherence: 96.2% vs 89.1%) and a crossover cohort study in Uganda (mean adherence: 84% vs 93%), demonstrated improved ART adherence. No studies demonstrated improved viral suppression. In the meta-analyses, we estimated that RTMM-based digital adherence tools had a statistically insignificant small positive effect on ART adherence and viral suppression with a standardized mean difference of 0.1922 [95% CI: -0.0268 to 0.4112, P-value: 0.0854] and viral suppression with an odds ratio of 1.3148 [95% CI: 0.9199 to 1.8791, P-value: 0.1331].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analyses found that RTMM-based DATs did not have a significant effect on ART adherence and viral suppression. However, due to few published studies available, heterogeneity of target populations, intervention designs, and adherence measurement instruments, more data are required to provide conclusive evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Real-Time Medication Monitoring-Based Digital Adherence Tools on Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy and Viral Suppression in People Living With HIV: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Takondwa Charles Msosa, Iraseni Swai, Rob Aarnoutse, Tobias F Rinke de Wit, Kennedy Ngowi, Chisomo Msefula, Marriott Nliwasa, Marion Sumari-de Boer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to improved treatment outcomes in persons living with HIV. Adherence to ART is required to achieve viral suppression. Real-time medication monitoring (RTMM)-based digital adherence tools (DATs) could be effective in improving ART adherence and viral suppression in persons living with HIV.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary and secondary objectives of this review were to assess the effect of RTMM-based DATs on improving ART adherence and viral load suppression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health for publications published through October 11, 2022. Narrative synthesis and random effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 638 papers identified, 8 were included. Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 2 were cohort studies. Two studies, an RCT in China (mean adherence: 96.2% vs 89.1%) and a crossover cohort study in Uganda (mean adherence: 84% vs 93%), demonstrated improved ART adherence. No studies demonstrated improved viral suppression. In the meta-analyses, we estimated that RTMM-based digital adherence tools had a statistically insignificant small positive effect on ART adherence and viral suppression with a standardized mean difference of 0.1922 [95% CI: -0.0268 to 0.4112, P-value: 0.0854] and viral suppression with an odds ratio of 1.3148 [95% CI: 0.9199 to 1.8791, P-value: 0.1331].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analyses found that RTMM-based DATs did not have a significant effect on ART adherence and viral suppression. However, due to few published studies available, heterogeneity of target populations, intervention designs, and adherence measurement instruments, more data are required to provide conclusive evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236270/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003449\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:普及抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)改善了艾滋病毒感染者的治疗效果。要实现病毒抑制,就必须坚持抗逆转录病毒疗法。基于实时用药监测(RTMM)的数字依从性工具(DATs)可有效改善艾滋病病毒感染者坚持抗逆转录病毒疗法和病毒抑制的情况:本综述的主要目标和次要目标是评估基于 RTMM 的 DAT 对改善抗逆转录病毒疗法依从性和病毒载量抑制的效果:我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Global Health 中截至 2022 年 10 月 11 日发表的出版物。我们进行了叙述性综合分析和随机效应荟萃分析,以综合结果:在确定的 638 篇论文中,有 8 篇被纳入。6项研究为随机对照试验(RCT),2项为队列研究。中国的一项随机对照试验(平均依从率:96.2% 对 89.1%)和乌干达的一项交叉队列研究(平均依从率:84% 对 93%)这两项研究表明,坚持抗逆转录病毒疗法的效果有所改善。没有研究表明病毒抑制率有所提高。在荟萃分析中,我们估计基于 RTMM 的数字化依从性工具对坚持抗逆转录病毒疗法和病毒抑制有统计学上不显著的小幅积极影响,标准化平均差为 0.1922 [95% CI:-0.0268 至 0.4112,P 值:0.0854],病毒抑制的几率为 1.3148 [95% CI:0.9199 至 1.8791,P 值:0.1331]:我们的荟萃分析发现,基于 RTMM 的 DAT 对坚持抗逆转录病毒疗法和病毒抑制效果不显著。然而,由于已发表的研究较少,目标人群、干预设计和依从性测量工具存在异质性,因此需要更多数据才能提供确凿证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Real-Time Medication Monitoring-Based Digital Adherence Tools on Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy and Viral Suppression in People Living With HIV: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to improved treatment outcomes in persons living with HIV. Adherence to ART is required to achieve viral suppression. Real-time medication monitoring (RTMM)-based digital adherence tools (DATs) could be effective in improving ART adherence and viral suppression in persons living with HIV.

Objectives: The primary and secondary objectives of this review were to assess the effect of RTMM-based DATs on improving ART adherence and viral load suppression.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health for publications published through October 11, 2022. Narrative synthesis and random effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize the results.

Results: Of 638 papers identified, 8 were included. Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 2 were cohort studies. Two studies, an RCT in China (mean adherence: 96.2% vs 89.1%) and a crossover cohort study in Uganda (mean adherence: 84% vs 93%), demonstrated improved ART adherence. No studies demonstrated improved viral suppression. In the meta-analyses, we estimated that RTMM-based digital adherence tools had a statistically insignificant small positive effect on ART adherence and viral suppression with a standardized mean difference of 0.1922 [95% CI: -0.0268 to 0.4112, P-value: 0.0854] and viral suppression with an odds ratio of 1.3148 [95% CI: 0.9199 to 1.8791, P-value: 0.1331].

Conclusions: Our meta-analyses found that RTMM-based DATs did not have a significant effect on ART adherence and viral suppression. However, due to few published studies available, heterogeneity of target populations, intervention designs, and adherence measurement instruments, more data are required to provide conclusive evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
490
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes​ seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信