Peng Huang, Dong-huan Liu, Hu Guo, Ke Xie, Qing-ping Zhang, Zhi-fang Deng
{"title":"材料点法的接触算法及与有限元法的比较","authors":"Peng Huang, Dong-huan Liu, Hu Guo, Ke Xie, Qing-ping Zhang, Zhi-fang Deng","doi":"10.1007/s10596-024-10302-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Being a fully Lagrangian particle method, the material point method (MPM) discretizes a material domain by using a collection of material points. The momentum equations in MPM are solved on a predefined regular background grid, so that the grid distortion and entanglement are completely avoided in MPM. The contact algorithm of MPM is developed via the background grid and the impenetrability condition between bodies. The contact algorithm of MPM is applied to solve some impact and perforation problems. This study concerns the validation of the contact algorithm of MPM. Solutions from MPM with the contact algorithm are compared to those from the finite element method (FEM) with the penalty method. For two impact problems, the results from MPM with the contact algorithm are in good agreement with those obtained with the FEM penalty method. For the perforation problem of aluminum plate, the results obtained using MPM with the contact algorithm are better than those from the FEM penalty method. We think that for impact problems without extreme large deformations, it is better to use the FEM penalty method. For impact problems with extreme large deformations, it is better to use the contact algorithm of MPM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10662,"journal":{"name":"Computational Geosciences","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact algorithm of the material point method and comparison with the finite element method\",\"authors\":\"Peng Huang, Dong-huan Liu, Hu Guo, Ke Xie, Qing-ping Zhang, Zhi-fang Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10596-024-10302-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Being a fully Lagrangian particle method, the material point method (MPM) discretizes a material domain by using a collection of material points. The momentum equations in MPM are solved on a predefined regular background grid, so that the grid distortion and entanglement are completely avoided in MPM. The contact algorithm of MPM is developed via the background grid and the impenetrability condition between bodies. The contact algorithm of MPM is applied to solve some impact and perforation problems. This study concerns the validation of the contact algorithm of MPM. Solutions from MPM with the contact algorithm are compared to those from the finite element method (FEM) with the penalty method. For two impact problems, the results from MPM with the contact algorithm are in good agreement with those obtained with the FEM penalty method. For the perforation problem of aluminum plate, the results obtained using MPM with the contact algorithm are better than those from the FEM penalty method. We think that for impact problems without extreme large deformations, it is better to use the FEM penalty method. For impact problems with extreme large deformations, it is better to use the contact algorithm of MPM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-024-10302-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-024-10302-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contact algorithm of the material point method and comparison with the finite element method
Being a fully Lagrangian particle method, the material point method (MPM) discretizes a material domain by using a collection of material points. The momentum equations in MPM are solved on a predefined regular background grid, so that the grid distortion and entanglement are completely avoided in MPM. The contact algorithm of MPM is developed via the background grid and the impenetrability condition between bodies. The contact algorithm of MPM is applied to solve some impact and perforation problems. This study concerns the validation of the contact algorithm of MPM. Solutions from MPM with the contact algorithm are compared to those from the finite element method (FEM) with the penalty method. For two impact problems, the results from MPM with the contact algorithm are in good agreement with those obtained with the FEM penalty method. For the perforation problem of aluminum plate, the results obtained using MPM with the contact algorithm are better than those from the FEM penalty method. We think that for impact problems without extreme large deformations, it is better to use the FEM penalty method. For impact problems with extreme large deformations, it is better to use the contact algorithm of MPM.
期刊介绍:
Computational Geosciences publishes high quality papers on mathematical modeling, simulation, numerical analysis, and other computational aspects of the geosciences. In particular the journal is focused on advanced numerical methods for the simulation of subsurface flow and transport, and associated aspects such as discretization, gridding, upscaling, optimization, data assimilation, uncertainty assessment, and high performance parallel and grid computing.
Papers treating similar topics but with applications to other fields in the geosciences, such as geomechanics, geophysics, oceanography, or meteorology, will also be considered.
The journal provides a platform for interaction and multidisciplinary collaboration among diverse scientific groups, from both academia and industry, which share an interest in developing mathematical models and efficient algorithms for solving them, such as mathematicians, engineers, chemists, physicists, and geoscientists.