O-184 摩洛哥渔民的医疗和社会保险:现状、制约因素和前景

Mohammed Omar Idrissi Kaitouni, Nadia Manar, Omar Laraqui, Frédéric Deschamps, Chakib El Houssine Laraqui Hossini
{"title":"O-184 摩洛哥渔民的医疗和社会保险:现状、制约因素和前景","authors":"Mohammed Omar Idrissi Kaitouni, Nadia Manar, Omar Laraqui, Frédéric Deschamps, Chakib El Houssine Laraqui Hossini","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Objective critical analysis of medico-social cover for fishermen: limitations and recommendations. Medical and social cover for fishermen raises a number of issues of a legislative, ethical, deontological and practical nature. Methods A cross-sectional epidemiological survey was carried out among physicians working in the seafarers’ health facilities (ASGM). Results and discussion ASGM physicians, providing both care and prevention activities, infringe the provisions of the law relating to the practice of medicine. We have 20 occupational health physicians for 120,509 fishermen. We need around 70. The Ministry of Health provides the medical staff, which is an aberration because it pays the occupational health physicians who provide preventive care in the private sector. The Labor Code stipulates that medical services and the remuneration of occupational physicians are the responsibility of the company. Wouldn’t it be useful to introduce a compulsory prevention contribution, which would enable occupational health cover to be extended to the entire working population? Should the compulsory maritime insurance required of all shipowners include a contribution to occupational risk prevention? The high turnover of fishermen who change port of registration disrupts the proper monitoring of ASGMs. Wouldn’t it be useful to digitize the medical records and individual maritime booklet of fishermen as part of an intranet? The national reference rate has not been increased since 2006, resulting in quantitative and qualitative shortfalls in care. Shouldn’t a third-party payment system be considered? Conclusion Several actions are needed to improve the health and safety of fishermen","PeriodicalId":19452,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O-184 MEDICAL AND SOCIAL COVER FOR FISHERMEN IN MOROCCO: CURRENT SITUATION, CONSTRAINTS AND PROSPECTS\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Omar Idrissi Kaitouni, Nadia Manar, Omar Laraqui, Frédéric Deschamps, Chakib El Houssine Laraqui Hossini\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Objective critical analysis of medico-social cover for fishermen: limitations and recommendations. Medical and social cover for fishermen raises a number of issues of a legislative, ethical, deontological and practical nature. Methods A cross-sectional epidemiological survey was carried out among physicians working in the seafarers’ health facilities (ASGM). Results and discussion ASGM physicians, providing both care and prevention activities, infringe the provisions of the law relating to the practice of medicine. We have 20 occupational health physicians for 120,509 fishermen. We need around 70. The Ministry of Health provides the medical staff, which is an aberration because it pays the occupational health physicians who provide preventive care in the private sector. The Labor Code stipulates that medical services and the remuneration of occupational physicians are the responsibility of the company. Wouldn’t it be useful to introduce a compulsory prevention contribution, which would enable occupational health cover to be extended to the entire working population? Should the compulsory maritime insurance required of all shipowners include a contribution to occupational risk prevention? The high turnover of fishermen who change port of registration disrupts the proper monitoring of ASGMs. Wouldn’t it be useful to digitize the medical records and individual maritime booklet of fishermen as part of an intranet? The national reference rate has not been increased since 2006, resulting in quantitative and qualitative shortfalls in care. Shouldn’t a third-party payment system be considered? Conclusion Several actions are needed to improve the health and safety of fishermen\",\"PeriodicalId\":19452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:对渔民医疗和社会保险的客观分析:局限性和建议。为渔民提供医疗和社会保险提出了一系列立法、伦理、道义和实践方面的问题。方法 对在海员医疗机构(ASGM)工作的医生进行了横向流行病学调查。结果与讨论 ASGM 的医生既提供医疗服务又开展预防活动,违反了有关行医的法律规定。我们为 120 509 名渔民配备了 20 名职业保健医生。我们需要 70 名左右。卫生部提供医务人员,这是一种反常现象,因为卫生部向在私营部门提供预防保健服务的职业保健医生支付费用。劳动法》规定,医疗服务和职业医生的报酬由公司负责。引入强制性预防缴款,将职业健康保险扩大到所有劳动人口,这难道不是有益的吗?要求所有船主购买的强制性海上保险是否应包括职业风险预防缴款?渔民更换登记港口的频率很高,这扰乱了对个体和小规模渔业的适当监测。将渔民的医疗记录和个人海事手册数字化,作为内联网的一部分,不是很有用吗?自 2006 年以来,国家基准费率一直没有提高,导致医疗服务在数量和质量上的不足。是否应考虑建立第三方支付系统?结论 需要采取几项行动来改善渔民的健康和安全
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O-184 MEDICAL AND SOCIAL COVER FOR FISHERMEN IN MOROCCO: CURRENT SITUATION, CONSTRAINTS AND PROSPECTS
Introduction: Objective critical analysis of medico-social cover for fishermen: limitations and recommendations. Medical and social cover for fishermen raises a number of issues of a legislative, ethical, deontological and practical nature. Methods A cross-sectional epidemiological survey was carried out among physicians working in the seafarers’ health facilities (ASGM). Results and discussion ASGM physicians, providing both care and prevention activities, infringe the provisions of the law relating to the practice of medicine. We have 20 occupational health physicians for 120,509 fishermen. We need around 70. The Ministry of Health provides the medical staff, which is an aberration because it pays the occupational health physicians who provide preventive care in the private sector. The Labor Code stipulates that medical services and the remuneration of occupational physicians are the responsibility of the company. Wouldn’t it be useful to introduce a compulsory prevention contribution, which would enable occupational health cover to be extended to the entire working population? Should the compulsory maritime insurance required of all shipowners include a contribution to occupational risk prevention? The high turnover of fishermen who change port of registration disrupts the proper monitoring of ASGMs. Wouldn’t it be useful to digitize the medical records and individual maritime booklet of fishermen as part of an intranet? The national reference rate has not been increased since 2006, resulting in quantitative and qualitative shortfalls in care. Shouldn’t a third-party payment system be considered? Conclusion Several actions are needed to improve the health and safety of fishermen
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信