复杂用药方案的大语言模型管理:基于案例的评估

Amoreena Most, Aaron Chase, Steven Xu, Tanner Hedrick, Brian Murray, Kelli Keats, Susan Smith, Erin Barreto, Tianming Liu, Andrea Sikora
{"title":"复杂用药方案的大语言模型管理:基于案例的评估","authors":"Amoreena Most, Aaron Chase, Steven Xu, Tanner Hedrick, Brian Murray, Kelli Keats, Susan Smith, Erin Barreto, Tianming Liu, Andrea Sikora","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.03.24309889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Large language models (LLMs) have shown capability in diagnosing complex medical cases and passing medical licensing exams, but to date, only limited evaluations have studied how LLMs interpret, analyze, and optimize complex medication regimens. The purpose of this evaluation was to test four LLMs ability to identify medication errors and appropriate medication interventions on complex patient cases from the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: A series of eight patient cases were developed by critical care pharmacists including history of present illness, laboratory values, vital signs, and medication regimens. Then, four LLMs (ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), ChatGPT (GPT-4), Claude2, and Llama2-7b) were prompted to develop a medication regimen for the patient. LLM generated medication regimens were then reviewed by a panel of seven critical care pharmacists to assess for presence of medication errors and clinical relevance. For each medication regimen recommended by the LLM, clinicians were asked to assess for if they would continue a medication, identify perceived medication errors in the medications recommended, identify the presence of life-threatening medication choices, and rank overall agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: The clinician panel rated to continue therapies recommended by the LLMs between 55.8-67.9% of the time. Clinicians perceived between 1.57-4.29 medication errors per recommended regimen, and life-threatening recommendations were present between 15.0-55.3% of the time. Level agreement was between 1.85-2.67 for the four LLMs. Conclusions: LLMs demonstrated potential to serve as clinical decision support for the management of complex medication regimens with further domain specific training; however, caution should be used when employing LLMs for medication management given the present capabilities.","PeriodicalId":501447,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large language models management of complex medication regimens: a case-based evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Amoreena Most, Aaron Chase, Steven Xu, Tanner Hedrick, Brian Murray, Kelli Keats, Susan Smith, Erin Barreto, Tianming Liu, Andrea Sikora\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.03.24309889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Large language models (LLMs) have shown capability in diagnosing complex medical cases and passing medical licensing exams, but to date, only limited evaluations have studied how LLMs interpret, analyze, and optimize complex medication regimens. The purpose of this evaluation was to test four LLMs ability to identify medication errors and appropriate medication interventions on complex patient cases from the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: A series of eight patient cases were developed by critical care pharmacists including history of present illness, laboratory values, vital signs, and medication regimens. Then, four LLMs (ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), ChatGPT (GPT-4), Claude2, and Llama2-7b) were prompted to develop a medication regimen for the patient. LLM generated medication regimens were then reviewed by a panel of seven critical care pharmacists to assess for presence of medication errors and clinical relevance. For each medication regimen recommended by the LLM, clinicians were asked to assess for if they would continue a medication, identify perceived medication errors in the medications recommended, identify the presence of life-threatening medication choices, and rank overall agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: The clinician panel rated to continue therapies recommended by the LLMs between 55.8-67.9% of the time. Clinicians perceived between 1.57-4.29 medication errors per recommended regimen, and life-threatening recommendations were present between 15.0-55.3% of the time. Level agreement was between 1.85-2.67 for the four LLMs. Conclusions: LLMs demonstrated potential to serve as clinical decision support for the management of complex medication regimens with further domain specific training; however, caution should be used when employing LLMs for medication management given the present capabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.03.24309889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.03.24309889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大语言模型(LLMs)已显示出诊断复杂病例和通过医学执照考试的能力,但迄今为止,对 LLMs 如何解释、分析和优化复杂用药方案的研究还很有限。本次评估的目的是测试四种 LLM 识别用药错误和对重症监护室(ICU)复杂病例进行适当用药干预的能力。方法:重症监护药剂师制定了一系列共 8 个患者病例,包括现病史、实验室值、生命体征和用药方案。然后,提示四个 LLM(ChatGPT (GPT-3.5)、ChatGPT (GPT-4)、Claude2 和 Llama2-7b)为患者制定用药方案。然后,由七名重症监护药剂师组成的小组对 LLM 生成的用药方案进行审核,以评估是否存在用药错误和临床相关性。对于 LLM 推荐的每种用药方案,临床医生都被要求评估他们是否会继续用药、识别推荐药物中存在的用药错误、识别是否存在危及生命的用药选择,并以 5 分制李克特量表对总体同意程度进行排序。结果:临床医生小组在 55.8-67.9% 的情况下会继续使用法律硕士推荐的疗法。临床医生认为每个推荐方案存在 1.57-4.29 个用药错误,15.0-55.3% 的时间存在危及生命的建议。四项 LLM 的一致性水平在 1.85-2.67 之间。结论:LLMs显示出作为复杂用药方案管理的临床决策支持的潜力,但鉴于目前的能力,在使用LLMs进行用药管理时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large language models management of complex medication regimens: a case-based evaluation
Background: Large language models (LLMs) have shown capability in diagnosing complex medical cases and passing medical licensing exams, but to date, only limited evaluations have studied how LLMs interpret, analyze, and optimize complex medication regimens. The purpose of this evaluation was to test four LLMs ability to identify medication errors and appropriate medication interventions on complex patient cases from the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: A series of eight patient cases were developed by critical care pharmacists including history of present illness, laboratory values, vital signs, and medication regimens. Then, four LLMs (ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), ChatGPT (GPT-4), Claude2, and Llama2-7b) were prompted to develop a medication regimen for the patient. LLM generated medication regimens were then reviewed by a panel of seven critical care pharmacists to assess for presence of medication errors and clinical relevance. For each medication regimen recommended by the LLM, clinicians were asked to assess for if they would continue a medication, identify perceived medication errors in the medications recommended, identify the presence of life-threatening medication choices, and rank overall agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: The clinician panel rated to continue therapies recommended by the LLMs between 55.8-67.9% of the time. Clinicians perceived between 1.57-4.29 medication errors per recommended regimen, and life-threatening recommendations were present between 15.0-55.3% of the time. Level agreement was between 1.85-2.67 for the four LLMs. Conclusions: LLMs demonstrated potential to serve as clinical decision support for the management of complex medication regimens with further domain specific training; however, caution should be used when employing LLMs for medication management given the present capabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信