根据良好管理原则获取瑞典的环境信息

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW
Monirul Azam
{"title":"根据良好管理原则获取瑞典的环境信息","authors":"Monirul Azam","doi":"10.1108/ijlma-12-2023-0281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to examine how Sweden, as a member state of the European Union (EU), has implemented the EU Directive on Public Access to Environmental Information (AEI directive) in the context of the principles of good administration.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper adopts the EU law methodology, as this paper mainly examines the implementation of the EU AEI directive by the member states and, as an EU member state, how Sweden used procedural autonomy to implement the EU directive at the national level. The EU law methodology further guides how national laws are to be interpreted considering obligations under the EU law. This paper further applies a comparative review to determine the differences in the approaches used by the AEI directive and relevant Swedish national laws to facilitate access to environmental information.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Despite Sweden used a minimalist approach rather than maximal harmonization while implementing the AEI directive at the national level, the Swedish model of the accessibility and availability of environmental information is fully compliant with the principles of good administration. The Swedish approach has an enormous effect on promoting access to environmental information as an integral part of good governance and fundamental rights.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>It was not possible to perform a comparative review of court cases on relevant issues from different EU member states.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Access to environmental information could be a tool for environmental democracy and sustainable development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>Access to environmental information could contribute to more public engagement and participation in environmental decision making and hence could make developmental projects more inclusive to meet societal objectives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study makes a unique contribution by evaluating access to environmental information in the context of the principles of good administration under EU law.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46125,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to environmental information in Sweden in the context of principles of good administration\",\"authors\":\"Monirul Azam\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijlma-12-2023-0281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to examine how Sweden, as a member state of the European Union (EU), has implemented the EU Directive on Public Access to Environmental Information (AEI directive) in the context of the principles of good administration.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This paper adopts the EU law methodology, as this paper mainly examines the implementation of the EU AEI directive by the member states and, as an EU member state, how Sweden used procedural autonomy to implement the EU directive at the national level. The EU law methodology further guides how national laws are to be interpreted considering obligations under the EU law. This paper further applies a comparative review to determine the differences in the approaches used by the AEI directive and relevant Swedish national laws to facilitate access to environmental information.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Despite Sweden used a minimalist approach rather than maximal harmonization while implementing the AEI directive at the national level, the Swedish model of the accessibility and availability of environmental information is fully compliant with the principles of good administration. The Swedish approach has an enormous effect on promoting access to environmental information as an integral part of good governance and fundamental rights.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>It was not possible to perform a comparative review of court cases on relevant issues from different EU member states.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Access to environmental information could be a tool for environmental democracy and sustainable development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>Access to environmental information could contribute to more public engagement and participation in environmental decision making and hence could make developmental projects more inclusive to meet societal objectives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study makes a unique contribution by evaluating access to environmental information in the context of the principles of good administration under EU law.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":46125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-12-2023-0281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-12-2023-0281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在研究作为欧盟成员国的瑞典是如何在良好行政管理原则的背景下实施欧盟《公众 获取环境信息指令》(AEI 指令)的。设计/方法/途径 本文采用欧盟法律方法,因为本文主要研究欧盟成员国对欧盟 AEI 指令的实施情况, 以及作为欧盟成员国的瑞典是如何在国家层面利用程序自治来实施欧盟指令的。欧盟法律方法论进一步指导了如何考虑欧盟法律规定的义务来解释国家法律。尽管瑞典在国家层面实施欧盟环境信息指令时采用了最低限度的方法而不是最大限度的协调,但瑞典的环境信息可获取性和可用性模式完全符合良好管理的原则。瑞典的做法对促进环境信息的获取产生了巨大的影响,是良好治理和基本权利的一个组成部 分。研究的局限性/影响无法对欧盟不同成员国相关问题的法院案例进行比较审查。社会意义获取环境信息可以促进公众更多地参与环境决策,从而使发展项目更具包容性,以实现社会目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to environmental information in Sweden in the context of principles of good administration

Purpose

This paper aims to examine how Sweden, as a member state of the European Union (EU), has implemented the EU Directive on Public Access to Environmental Information (AEI directive) in the context of the principles of good administration.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper adopts the EU law methodology, as this paper mainly examines the implementation of the EU AEI directive by the member states and, as an EU member state, how Sweden used procedural autonomy to implement the EU directive at the national level. The EU law methodology further guides how national laws are to be interpreted considering obligations under the EU law. This paper further applies a comparative review to determine the differences in the approaches used by the AEI directive and relevant Swedish national laws to facilitate access to environmental information.

Findings

Despite Sweden used a minimalist approach rather than maximal harmonization while implementing the AEI directive at the national level, the Swedish model of the accessibility and availability of environmental information is fully compliant with the principles of good administration. The Swedish approach has an enormous effect on promoting access to environmental information as an integral part of good governance and fundamental rights.

Research limitations/implications

It was not possible to perform a comparative review of court cases on relevant issues from different EU member states.

Practical implications

Access to environmental information could be a tool for environmental democracy and sustainable development.

Social implications

Access to environmental information could contribute to more public engagement and participation in environmental decision making and hence could make developmental projects more inclusive to meet societal objectives.

Originality/value

This study makes a unique contribution by evaluating access to environmental information in the context of the principles of good administration under EU law.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Management is a leading journal addressing all aspects of regulation and law as they impact on organisational development, operations and leadership. Organisations and their leaders operate in an increasingly complex world of emerging regulation across national and international boundaries. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to acknowledge the dynamics of that environment and provide a platform for articles and contributions to stimulate scholarly debate in the development of law and practice. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to present the latest research on policy, practice and theoretical perspectives and their impact on the development and leadership of organisations. Contributions of a multi-disciplinary nature are welcome. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: -Employment and industrial law- Corporate governance and social responsibility- Intellectual property- Corporate law and finance- Insolvency- Commercial law and consumer protection- Environmental law- Taxation- Competition law- Regulatory theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信