Understanding niche construction and phenotypic plasticity as causes of natural selection

For many evolutionary biologists, fitness differences cause trait frequency changes in populations, and natural selection explains the evolution of adaptations. Treating fitness differences as a cause, however, is more scientific convention rather than decree, and analyses of the causes of natural selection potentially afford richer evolutionary explanations. Unfortunately, the historical assumptions that the complexities of development leave the origins of phenotypic variation unpredictable, and that ecological processes are idiosyncratic, have hindered detailed analysis of the developmental bases of natural selection. A poorly appreciated consequence is that explanations reliant on selection potentially mask particular causal patterns important in evolution. Here, using examples of environmental modification and regulation by organisms (‘niche construction’, a.k.a. ‘ecosystem engineering’), and developmental plastic responses to environmental conditions (‘phenotypic plasticity’), I will highlight how the development and activities of organisms create developmental biases that co‐determine the nature of the response to selection, in an often surprisingly well‐regulated manner. Niche construction biases the phenotypic variation exposed to selection, often generating axes of covariation with plastically expressed morphological traits. Taxonomically shared developmental mechanisms aggregate across populations to generate statistical regularities that are easy to miss because the developmental causes of fitness differences are not currently central to the study of evolution. Recent theory and experiments suggest that how organisms develop and what organisms do cause and strengthen the relationship between key traits and fitness, thereby part‐determining the characteristics of natural selection. The findings have implications for understanding parallel evolution, macroevolutionary trends and variation in evolvability.