垂钓者对活饵法规和入侵物种的了解:预防入侵物种的启示

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Alexis L. Gerber, Hannah Mulligan, Mark A. Kaemingk, Alison A. Coulter
{"title":"垂钓者对活饵法规和入侵物种的了解:预防入侵物种的启示","authors":"Alexis L. Gerber, Hannah Mulligan, Mark A. Kaemingk, Alison A. Coulter","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03378-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prevention of aquatic invasive species is one of the most cost-effective management strategies for reducing negative ecological, economic, and social impacts to freshwater ecosystems. The release of leftover baitfish via the live bait trade has been identified as a high-risk pathway for introducing invasive species beyond physical barriers (e.g., mountains, dams). To assess differences in behavior surrounding live bait use and angler knowledge of invasive species, we conducted in-person angler surveys at waterbody access sites (i.e. boat ramps with available shore fishing and a shore fishing location with no boat ramp) along the Missouri River, above and below Gavins Point Dam (Yankton, South Dakota, USA). We were primarily interested in whether angler behavior and knowledge differed among fishing locations over the course of a year because of potential variation in risk. Gavins Point Dam is impervious to fish passage and prevents the spread of invasive silver carp <i>Hypophthalmichthys molitrix</i> and bighead carp <i>H. nobilis</i> (collectively known as bigheaded carp), but bigheaded carp could be transported above this dam by the use of live baitfish. Regardless of where respondents fished (above the dam/carp absent, below the dam/carp present, or both), 70% ± 11.12 of anglers used live baitfish and 57% ± 3.14 participated in ‘higher risk’ baitfish practices including release. Knowledge of bigheaded carp was limited, as only 2% ± 1.31 of respondents identified both bigheaded carp as invasive in an image collage, 51.82% ± 4.48 could not identify where invasive carp are present/absent, and 40% ± 3.34 of anglers had not received any information regarding bigheaded carp. These findings highlight limitations in angler knowledge, compliance, and identification of native and invasive species. Future implementable actions could include invasive species and baitfish release outreach via electronic media sources or additional signage that address these knowledge gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angler knowledge of live bait regulations and invasive species: insights for invasive species prevention\",\"authors\":\"Alexis L. Gerber, Hannah Mulligan, Mark A. Kaemingk, Alison A. Coulter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10530-024-03378-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The prevention of aquatic invasive species is one of the most cost-effective management strategies for reducing negative ecological, economic, and social impacts to freshwater ecosystems. The release of leftover baitfish via the live bait trade has been identified as a high-risk pathway for introducing invasive species beyond physical barriers (e.g., mountains, dams). To assess differences in behavior surrounding live bait use and angler knowledge of invasive species, we conducted in-person angler surveys at waterbody access sites (i.e. boat ramps with available shore fishing and a shore fishing location with no boat ramp) along the Missouri River, above and below Gavins Point Dam (Yankton, South Dakota, USA). We were primarily interested in whether angler behavior and knowledge differed among fishing locations over the course of a year because of potential variation in risk. Gavins Point Dam is impervious to fish passage and prevents the spread of invasive silver carp <i>Hypophthalmichthys molitrix</i> and bighead carp <i>H. nobilis</i> (collectively known as bigheaded carp), but bigheaded carp could be transported above this dam by the use of live baitfish. Regardless of where respondents fished (above the dam/carp absent, below the dam/carp present, or both), 70% ± 11.12 of anglers used live baitfish and 57% ± 3.14 participated in ‘higher risk’ baitfish practices including release. Knowledge of bigheaded carp was limited, as only 2% ± 1.31 of respondents identified both bigheaded carp as invasive in an image collage, 51.82% ± 4.48 could not identify where invasive carp are present/absent, and 40% ± 3.34 of anglers had not received any information regarding bigheaded carp. These findings highlight limitations in angler knowledge, compliance, and identification of native and invasive species. Future implementable actions could include invasive species and baitfish release outreach via electronic media sources or additional signage that address these knowledge gaps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Invasions\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Invasions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03378-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03378-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预防水生入侵物种是减少对淡水生态系统的生态、经济和社会负面影响的最具成本效益的管理策略之一。通过活饵料贸易释放剩余饵料鱼已被确定为将入侵物种引入物理屏障(如山脉、水坝)之外的高风险途径。为了评估围绕活饵使用的行为差异以及垂钓者对入侵物种的了解,我们在密苏里河沿岸加文斯点水坝(美国南达科他州扬克顿)上下的水体入口处(即有岸钓的船坞和没有船坞的岸钓地点)对垂钓者进行了亲身调查。我们主要关注的是垂钓者的行为和知识在一年中是否会因为潜在的风险变化而在不同的垂钓地点有所不同。加文斯点大坝(Gavins Point Dam)不允许鱼类通过,可防止外来入侵的鲢鱼(Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)和鳙鱼(H. nobilis,统称鳙鱼)扩散,但使用活饵料鱼可将鳙鱼带到大坝上方。无论受访者在哪里垂钓(水坝上方/无鲤鱼、水坝下方/有鲤鱼或两者皆有),70%(± 11.12)的垂钓者使用活饵鱼,57%(± 3.14)的垂钓者参与了包括放生在内的 "高风险 "饵鱼做法。垂钓者对大头鲤的了解有限,只有 2% ± 1.31 的受访者在图片拼贴中将大头鲤认定为入侵性鱼类,51.82% ± 4.48 的受访者无法确定入侵性鲤鱼存在/不存在的地点,40% ± 3.34 的垂钓者未收到任何有关大头鲤的信息。这些发现凸显了垂钓者在了解、遵守以及识别本地和入侵物种方面的局限性。未来可实施的行动可包括通过电子媒体进行入侵物种和饵料鱼释放宣传,或增加标识牌以解决这些知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Angler knowledge of live bait regulations and invasive species: insights for invasive species prevention

Angler knowledge of live bait regulations and invasive species: insights for invasive species prevention

The prevention of aquatic invasive species is one of the most cost-effective management strategies for reducing negative ecological, economic, and social impacts to freshwater ecosystems. The release of leftover baitfish via the live bait trade has been identified as a high-risk pathway for introducing invasive species beyond physical barriers (e.g., mountains, dams). To assess differences in behavior surrounding live bait use and angler knowledge of invasive species, we conducted in-person angler surveys at waterbody access sites (i.e. boat ramps with available shore fishing and a shore fishing location with no boat ramp) along the Missouri River, above and below Gavins Point Dam (Yankton, South Dakota, USA). We were primarily interested in whether angler behavior and knowledge differed among fishing locations over the course of a year because of potential variation in risk. Gavins Point Dam is impervious to fish passage and prevents the spread of invasive silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and bighead carp H. nobilis (collectively known as bigheaded carp), but bigheaded carp could be transported above this dam by the use of live baitfish. Regardless of where respondents fished (above the dam/carp absent, below the dam/carp present, or both), 70% ± 11.12 of anglers used live baitfish and 57% ± 3.14 participated in ‘higher risk’ baitfish practices including release. Knowledge of bigheaded carp was limited, as only 2% ± 1.31 of respondents identified both bigheaded carp as invasive in an image collage, 51.82% ± 4.48 could not identify where invasive carp are present/absent, and 40% ± 3.34 of anglers had not received any information regarding bigheaded carp. These findings highlight limitations in angler knowledge, compliance, and identification of native and invasive species. Future implementable actions could include invasive species and baitfish release outreach via electronic media sources or additional signage that address these knowledge gaps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Invasions
Biological Invasions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
248
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信