面部的亲切感会影响儿童对同伴模棱两可行为的解读。

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Sophia M. Thierry, Catherine J. Mondloch
{"title":"面部的亲切感会影响儿童对同伴模棱两可行为的解读。","authors":"Sophia M. Thierry,&nbsp;Catherine J. Mondloch","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Children infer personality traits from faces when they are asked explicitly which face appears nice or mean. Less is known about how children use face–trait information implicitly to make behavioral evaluations. We used the Ambiguous Situations Protocol to explore how children use face–trait information to form interpretations of ambiguous situations when the behavior or intention of the target child was unclear. On each trial, children (<em>N</em> = 144, age range = 4–11.95 years; 74 girls, 67 boys, 3 gender not specified; 70% White, 10% other or mixed race, 5% Asian, 4% Black, 1% Indigenous, 9% not specified) viewed a child’s face (previously rated high or low in niceness) before seeing the child’s face embedded within an ambiguous scene (Scene Task) or hearing a vignette about a misbehavior done by that child (Misbehavior Task). Children described what was happening in each scene and indicated whether each misbehavior was done on purpose or by accident. Children also rated the behavior of each child and indicated whether the child would be a good friend. Facial niceness influenced children’s interpretations of ambiguous behavior (Scene Task) by 4 years of age, and ambiguous intentions (Misbehavior Task) by 6 years. Our results suggest that the use of face–trait cues to form interpretations of ambiguous behavior emerges early in childhood, a bias that may lead to differential treatment for peers perceived with a high-nice face versus a low-nice face.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001371/pdfft?md5=1956044bb4181d1d6ef76fecbedd96c7&pid=1-s2.0-S0022096524001371-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facial impressions of niceness influence children’s interpretations of peers’ ambiguous behavior\",\"authors\":\"Sophia M. Thierry,&nbsp;Catherine J. Mondloch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Children infer personality traits from faces when they are asked explicitly which face appears nice or mean. Less is known about how children use face–trait information implicitly to make behavioral evaluations. We used the Ambiguous Situations Protocol to explore how children use face–trait information to form interpretations of ambiguous situations when the behavior or intention of the target child was unclear. On each trial, children (<em>N</em> = 144, age range = 4–11.95 years; 74 girls, 67 boys, 3 gender not specified; 70% White, 10% other or mixed race, 5% Asian, 4% Black, 1% Indigenous, 9% not specified) viewed a child’s face (previously rated high or low in niceness) before seeing the child’s face embedded within an ambiguous scene (Scene Task) or hearing a vignette about a misbehavior done by that child (Misbehavior Task). Children described what was happening in each scene and indicated whether each misbehavior was done on purpose or by accident. Children also rated the behavior of each child and indicated whether the child would be a good friend. Facial niceness influenced children’s interpretations of ambiguous behavior (Scene Task) by 4 years of age, and ambiguous intentions (Misbehavior Task) by 6 years. Our results suggest that the use of face–trait cues to form interpretations of ambiguous behavior emerges early in childhood, a bias that may lead to differential treatment for peers perceived with a high-nice face versus a low-nice face.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001371/pdfft?md5=1956044bb4181d1d6ef76fecbedd96c7&pid=1-s2.0-S0022096524001371-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001371\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当明确询问儿童哪张脸看起来好看或凶恶时,他们会从脸部推断出人格特质。至于儿童如何隐性地利用面孔特征信息来进行行为评价,目前还知之甚少。我们使用了 "模棱两可情境协议 "来探讨当目标儿童的行为或意图不明确时,儿童如何使用脸部特征信息来形成对模棱两可情境的解释。在每次试验中,儿童(人数=144,年龄范围=4-11.95 岁;74 名女孩,67 名男孩,3 名性别不详;70% 白人,10% 其他或混血,5% 亚洲人,4% 黑人,1% 土著人,9% 不详)在看到一个儿童的脸之前(之前被评为好感度高或低),会先看到该儿童的脸被嵌入一个模棱两可的场景中(场景任务),或听到一个关于该儿童所做不当行为的小故事(不当行为任务)。孩子们描述每个场景中发生的事情,并指出每个不当行为是故意还是偶然。孩子们还会对每个孩子的行为进行评分,并指出该孩子是否会成为好朋友。到 4 岁时,面部亲和力会影响儿童对模棱两可行为(场景任务)的解释,到 6 岁时,面部亲和力会影响儿童对模棱两可意图(不当行为任务)的解释。我们的研究结果表明,使用面部特征线索来形成对模棱两可行为的解释在儿童早期就已经出现了,这种偏差可能会导致对高好感面部和低好感面部的同伴的不同待遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facial impressions of niceness influence children’s interpretations of peers’ ambiguous behavior

Children infer personality traits from faces when they are asked explicitly which face appears nice or mean. Less is known about how children use face–trait information implicitly to make behavioral evaluations. We used the Ambiguous Situations Protocol to explore how children use face–trait information to form interpretations of ambiguous situations when the behavior or intention of the target child was unclear. On each trial, children (N = 144, age range = 4–11.95 years; 74 girls, 67 boys, 3 gender not specified; 70% White, 10% other or mixed race, 5% Asian, 4% Black, 1% Indigenous, 9% not specified) viewed a child’s face (previously rated high or low in niceness) before seeing the child’s face embedded within an ambiguous scene (Scene Task) or hearing a vignette about a misbehavior done by that child (Misbehavior Task). Children described what was happening in each scene and indicated whether each misbehavior was done on purpose or by accident. Children also rated the behavior of each child and indicated whether the child would be a good friend. Facial niceness influenced children’s interpretations of ambiguous behavior (Scene Task) by 4 years of age, and ambiguous intentions (Misbehavior Task) by 6 years. Our results suggest that the use of face–trait cues to form interpretations of ambiguous behavior emerges early in childhood, a bias that may lead to differential treatment for peers perceived with a high-nice face versus a low-nice face.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信