Felix Klawitter, Friederike Laukien, Dagmar-C Fischer, Anja Rahn, Katrin Porath, Lena Danckert, Rika Bajorat, Uwe Walter, Robert Patejdl, Johannes Ehler
{"title":"重症监护病房获得性乏力的血源性炎症、神经肌肉和神经血管生物标志物纵向评估：一项前瞻性单中心队列研究。","authors":"Felix Klawitter, Friederike Laukien, Dagmar-C Fischer, Anja Rahn, Katrin Porath, Lena Danckert, Rika Bajorat, Uwe Walter, Robert Patejdl, Johannes Ehler","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02050-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICUAW) and critical illness neuromyopathy (CINM) is frequently hampered in the clinical routine. We evaluated a novel panel of blood-based inflammatory, neuromuscular, and neurovascular biomarkers as an alternative diagnostic approach for ICUAW and CINM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted to the ICU with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of ≥ 8 on 3 consecutive days within the first 5 days as well as healthy controls were enrolled. The Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRCSS) was calculated, and motor and sensory electroneurography (ENG) for assessment of peripheral nerve function were performed at days 3 and 10. ICUAW was defined by an MRCSS < 48 and CINM by pathological ENG alterations, both at day 10. Blood samples were taken at days 3, 10, and 17 for quantitative analysis of 18 different biomarkers (white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, C-terminal agrin filament, fatty-acid-binding protein 3, growth and differentiation factor 15, syndecan 1, troponin I, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1α [IL-1α], IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1). Results of the biomarker analysis were categorized according to the ICUAW and CINM status. Clinical outcome was assessed after 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2016 and December 2018, 38 critically ill patients, grouped into ICUAW (18 with and 20 without) and CINM (18 with and 17 without), as well as ten healthy volunteers were included. Biomarkers were significantly elevated in critically ill patients compared to healthy controls and correlated with disease severity and 3-month outcome parameters. However, none of the biomarkers enabled discrimination of patients with and without neuromuscular impairment, irrespective of applied classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood-based biomarkers are generally elevated in ICU patients but do not identify patients with ICUAW or CINM.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02706314.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"118-130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal Assessment of Blood-Based Inflammatory, Neuromuscular, and Neurovascular Biomarker Profiles in Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Felix Klawitter, Friederike Laukien, Dagmar-C Fischer, Anja Rahn, Katrin Porath, Lena Danckert, Rika Bajorat, Uwe Walter, Robert Patejdl, Johannes Ehler\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-024-02050-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICUAW) and critical illness neuromyopathy (CINM) is frequently hampered in the clinical routine. We evaluated a novel panel of blood-based inflammatory, neuromuscular, and neurovascular biomarkers as an alternative diagnostic approach for ICUAW and CINM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted to the ICU with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of ≥ 8 on 3 consecutive days within the first 5 days as well as healthy controls were enrolled. The Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRCSS) was calculated, and motor and sensory electroneurography (ENG) for assessment of peripheral nerve function were performed at days 3 and 10. ICUAW was defined by an MRCSS < 48 and CINM by pathological ENG alterations, both at day 10. Blood samples were taken at days 3, 10, and 17 for quantitative analysis of 18 different biomarkers (white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, C-terminal agrin filament, fatty-acid-binding protein 3, growth and differentiation factor 15, syndecan 1, troponin I, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1α [IL-1α], IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1). Results of the biomarker analysis were categorized according to the ICUAW and CINM status. Clinical outcome was assessed after 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2016 and December 2018, 38 critically ill patients, grouped into ICUAW (18 with and 20 without) and CINM (18 with and 17 without), as well as ten healthy volunteers were included. Biomarkers were significantly elevated in critically ill patients compared to healthy controls and correlated with disease severity and 3-month outcome parameters. However, none of the biomarkers enabled discrimination of patients with and without neuromuscular impairment, irrespective of applied classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood-based biomarkers are generally elevated in ICU patients but do not identify patients with ICUAW or CINM.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02706314.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"118-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02050-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02050-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Longitudinal Assessment of Blood-Based Inflammatory, Neuromuscular, and Neurovascular Biomarker Profiles in Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study.
Background: The diagnosis of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICUAW) and critical illness neuromyopathy (CINM) is frequently hampered in the clinical routine. We evaluated a novel panel of blood-based inflammatory, neuromuscular, and neurovascular biomarkers as an alternative diagnostic approach for ICUAW and CINM.
Methods: Patients admitted to the ICU with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of ≥ 8 on 3 consecutive days within the first 5 days as well as healthy controls were enrolled. The Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRCSS) was calculated, and motor and sensory electroneurography (ENG) for assessment of peripheral nerve function were performed at days 3 and 10. ICUAW was defined by an MRCSS < 48 and CINM by pathological ENG alterations, both at day 10. Blood samples were taken at days 3, 10, and 17 for quantitative analysis of 18 different biomarkers (white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, C-terminal agrin filament, fatty-acid-binding protein 3, growth and differentiation factor 15, syndecan 1, troponin I, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1α [IL-1α], IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1). Results of the biomarker analysis were categorized according to the ICUAW and CINM status. Clinical outcome was assessed after 3 months.
Results: Between October 2016 and December 2018, 38 critically ill patients, grouped into ICUAW (18 with and 20 without) and CINM (18 with and 17 without), as well as ten healthy volunteers were included. Biomarkers were significantly elevated in critically ill patients compared to healthy controls and correlated with disease severity and 3-month outcome parameters. However, none of the biomarkers enabled discrimination of patients with and without neuromuscular impairment, irrespective of applied classification.
Conclusions: Blood-based biomarkers are generally elevated in ICU patients but do not identify patients with ICUAW or CINM.
期刊介绍：
Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
