转入心脏重症监护室的急性心力衰竭患者入院时的 HeartMate 风险评分类别与预后之间的关系。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Motoko Kametani, Yuichiro Minami, Hidetoshi Hattori, Shintaro Haruki, Junichi Yamaguchi
{"title":"转入心脏重症监护室的急性心力衰竭患者入院时的 HeartMate 风险评分类别与预后之间的关系。","authors":"Motoko Kametani, Yuichiro Minami, Hidetoshi Hattori, Shintaro Haruki, Junichi Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02436-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The HeartMate Risk Score (HMRS), a simple clinical prediction rule based on the patients' age, albumin, creatinine, and the international normalized ratio of the prothrombin time (PT-INR), is correlated with mortality in the cohort of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. However, in an aging society, an LAVD is indicated for only a small proportion of patients with acute heart failure (AHF), and whether the HMRS has prognostic implications for unselected patients with AHF is unknown. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of HMRS categories on admission in patients with AHF. We analyzed 339 hospitalized patients with AHF who had albumin, creatinine, and the PT-INR recorded on admission. The patients were categorized as follows: the High group (HMRS > 2.48, n = 131), Mid group (HMRS of 1.58-2.48, n = 97) group, and Low group (HMRS < 1.58, n = 111). The endpoints of this study were all-cause death and readmission for heart failure (HF). During a median follow-up of 247 days, 24 (18.3%) patients died in the High group, 7 (7.2%) died in the Mid group, and 8 (7.2%) died in the Low group. In a multivariable analysis adjusted for highly imbalanced baseline variables, a high HMRS was independently associated with survival, with a hazard ratio of 2.90 (95% confidence interval 1.42-5.96, P = 0.004). With regard to the composite endpoint of all-cause death and readmission for HF, the Mid group had a worse prognosis than the Low group, and the High group had the worst prognosis. A high HMRS on admission is associated with all-cause mortality and readmission for HF, and a mid-HMRS is associated with readmission for HF after AHF hospitalization. The HMRS may be a valid clinical tool to stratify the risk of adverse outcomes after hospitalization in unselected patients with AHF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between the HeartMate Risk Score category on admission and outcome in patients with acute heart failure referred to a cardiac intensive care unit.\",\"authors\":\"Motoko Kametani, Yuichiro Minami, Hidetoshi Hattori, Shintaro Haruki, Junichi Yamaguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00380-024-02436-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The HeartMate Risk Score (HMRS), a simple clinical prediction rule based on the patients' age, albumin, creatinine, and the international normalized ratio of the prothrombin time (PT-INR), is correlated with mortality in the cohort of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. However, in an aging society, an LAVD is indicated for only a small proportion of patients with acute heart failure (AHF), and whether the HMRS has prognostic implications for unselected patients with AHF is unknown. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of HMRS categories on admission in patients with AHF. We analyzed 339 hospitalized patients with AHF who had albumin, creatinine, and the PT-INR recorded on admission. The patients were categorized as follows: the High group (HMRS > 2.48, n = 131), Mid group (HMRS of 1.58-2.48, n = 97) group, and Low group (HMRS < 1.58, n = 111). The endpoints of this study were all-cause death and readmission for heart failure (HF). During a median follow-up of 247 days, 24 (18.3%) patients died in the High group, 7 (7.2%) died in the Mid group, and 8 (7.2%) died in the Low group. In a multivariable analysis adjusted for highly imbalanced baseline variables, a high HMRS was independently associated with survival, with a hazard ratio of 2.90 (95% confidence interval 1.42-5.96, P = 0.004). With regard to the composite endpoint of all-cause death and readmission for HF, the Mid group had a worse prognosis than the Low group, and the High group had the worst prognosis. A high HMRS on admission is associated with all-cause mortality and readmission for HF, and a mid-HMRS is associated with readmission for HF after AHF hospitalization. The HMRS may be a valid clinical tool to stratify the risk of adverse outcomes after hospitalization in unselected patients with AHF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02436-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02436-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

HeartMate风险评分(HMRS)是一种基于患者年龄、白蛋白、肌酐和凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值(PT-INR)的简单临床预测规则,它与左心室辅助装置(LVAD)接受者队列中的死亡率相关。然而,在老龄化社会中,LAVD 只适用于一小部分急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者,而 HMRS 是否对未经选择的 AHF 患者的预后有影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估急性心力衰竭患者入院时 HMRS 分类的预后价值。我们分析了 339 名入院时记录了白蛋白、肌酐和 PT-INR 的 AHF 住院患者。患者被分为以下几组:高组(HMRS > 2.48,n = 131)、中组(HMRS 为 1.58-2.48,n = 97)和低组(HMRS
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relationship between the HeartMate Risk Score category on admission and outcome in patients with acute heart failure referred to a cardiac intensive care unit.

Relationship between the HeartMate Risk Score category on admission and outcome in patients with acute heart failure referred to a cardiac intensive care unit.

The HeartMate Risk Score (HMRS), a simple clinical prediction rule based on the patients' age, albumin, creatinine, and the international normalized ratio of the prothrombin time (PT-INR), is correlated with mortality in the cohort of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. However, in an aging society, an LAVD is indicated for only a small proportion of patients with acute heart failure (AHF), and whether the HMRS has prognostic implications for unselected patients with AHF is unknown. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of HMRS categories on admission in patients with AHF. We analyzed 339 hospitalized patients with AHF who had albumin, creatinine, and the PT-INR recorded on admission. The patients were categorized as follows: the High group (HMRS > 2.48, n = 131), Mid group (HMRS of 1.58-2.48, n = 97) group, and Low group (HMRS < 1.58, n = 111). The endpoints of this study were all-cause death and readmission for heart failure (HF). During a median follow-up of 247 days, 24 (18.3%) patients died in the High group, 7 (7.2%) died in the Mid group, and 8 (7.2%) died in the Low group. In a multivariable analysis adjusted for highly imbalanced baseline variables, a high HMRS was independently associated with survival, with a hazard ratio of 2.90 (95% confidence interval 1.42-5.96, P = 0.004). With regard to the composite endpoint of all-cause death and readmission for HF, the Mid group had a worse prognosis than the Low group, and the High group had the worst prognosis. A high HMRS on admission is associated with all-cause mortality and readmission for HF, and a mid-HMRS is associated with readmission for HF after AHF hospitalization. The HMRS may be a valid clinical tool to stratify the risk of adverse outcomes after hospitalization in unselected patients with AHF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信