急症医院治疗药物监测干预措施的经济评估:系统综述。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jane E. Carland, David J. Carland, Jonathan Brett, Sophie L. Stocker, Darren M. Roberts, Richard O. Day, Tracey-Lea Laba
{"title":"急症医院治疗药物监测干预措施的经济评估:系统综述。","authors":"Jane E. Carland,&nbsp;David J. Carland,&nbsp;Jonathan Brett,&nbsp;Sophie L. Stocker,&nbsp;Darren M. Roberts,&nbsp;Richard O. Day,&nbsp;Tracey-Lea Laba","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) aims to optimize drug therapy. As demand on health resources increases, and the technology underpinning TDM becomes more sophisticated, the economic benefits of TDM in hospitals is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the economic evidence that could be used to support investment in TDM in hospital settings. In so doing, we sought to provide guidance for future economic evaluations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Econlit and NHS Economic Evaluation databases were searched (inception to December 2022) for economic evaluations of hospital-based TDM. Two authors reviewed the studies and extracted data. Overall quality of economic analysis reporting was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ten prospective studies (including six randomized studies) and nine retrospective studies were eligible. Overall study reporting was poor, publications meeting a median (range) of 61% (46–82%) of CHEERS checklist criteria. An antimicrobial TDM intervention for adult patients was the focus of most studies (<i>n</i> = 18). Variable clinical outcomes were reported, and length of stay was the primary economic outcome for most studies (<i>n</i> = 13). The majority of studies determined that TDM was economically and clinically favourable (<i>n</i> = 14), four studies reporting a cost-reduction in patient sub-populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Significant improvements in both economic and clinical outcomes may be realized with TDM interventions, particularly when targeted to complex patient populations. Attainment of therapeutic target could serve as a feasible surrogate measure of benefit for hospital-based TDM interventions. However, systematic reporting of economic outcomes is needed to inform investment decisions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16164","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic evaluations of therapeutic drug monitoring interventions in acute hospital-based settings: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jane E. Carland,&nbsp;David J. Carland,&nbsp;Jonathan Brett,&nbsp;Sophie L. Stocker,&nbsp;Darren M. Roberts,&nbsp;Richard O. Day,&nbsp;Tracey-Lea Laba\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) aims to optimize drug therapy. As demand on health resources increases, and the technology underpinning TDM becomes more sophisticated, the economic benefits of TDM in hospitals is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the economic evidence that could be used to support investment in TDM in hospital settings. In so doing, we sought to provide guidance for future economic evaluations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Econlit and NHS Economic Evaluation databases were searched (inception to December 2022) for economic evaluations of hospital-based TDM. Two authors reviewed the studies and extracted data. Overall quality of economic analysis reporting was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ten prospective studies (including six randomized studies) and nine retrospective studies were eligible. Overall study reporting was poor, publications meeting a median (range) of 61% (46–82%) of CHEERS checklist criteria. An antimicrobial TDM intervention for adult patients was the focus of most studies (<i>n</i> = 18). Variable clinical outcomes were reported, and length of stay was the primary economic outcome for most studies (<i>n</i> = 13). The majority of studies determined that TDM was economically and clinically favourable (<i>n</i> = 14), four studies reporting a cost-reduction in patient sub-populations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Significant improvements in both economic and clinical outcomes may be realized with TDM interventions, particularly when targeted to complex patient populations. Attainment of therapeutic target could serve as a feasible surrogate measure of benefit for hospital-based TDM interventions. However, systematic reporting of economic outcomes is needed to inform investment decisions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16164\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16164\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:治疗药物监测(TDM)旨在优化药物治疗。随着对医疗资源需求的增加以及 TDM 技术的日益成熟,医院开展 TDM 的经济效益尚不明确。本系统综述旨在总结可用于支持在医院环境中投资 TDM 的经济证据。在此过程中,我们试图为未来的经济评估提供指导:方法:我们检索了 Medline、Embase、CENTRAL、Econlit 和 NHS 经济评估数据库(从开始到 2022 年 12 月)中有关医院 TDM 经济评估的内容。两位作者审阅了这些研究并提取了数据。采用卫生经济评估综合报告标准(CHEERS)核对表对经济分析报告的整体质量进行评估:有 10 项前瞻性研究(包括 6 项随机研究)和 9 项回顾性研究符合条件。总体研究报告质量较差,符合 CHEERS 核对表标准的中位数(范围)为 61%(46%-82%)。大多数研究(n = 18)的重点是对成年患者进行抗菌药物 TDM 干预。报告的临床结果各不相同,住院时间是大多数研究(13 项)的主要经济结果。大多数研究认为,TDM在经济和临床方面都是有利的(14 项),其中四项研究报告称患者亚群的成本有所降低:结论:TDM干预措施可显著改善经济和临床效果,尤其是针对复杂的患者群体。达到治疗目标可作为衡量医院 TDM 干预措施效益的可行替代指标。不过,需要对经济效益进行系统报告,以便为投资决策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Economic evaluations of therapeutic drug monitoring interventions in acute hospital-based settings: A systematic review

Economic evaluations of therapeutic drug monitoring interventions in acute hospital-based settings: A systematic review

Aims

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) aims to optimize drug therapy. As demand on health resources increases, and the technology underpinning TDM becomes more sophisticated, the economic benefits of TDM in hospitals is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the economic evidence that could be used to support investment in TDM in hospital settings. In so doing, we sought to provide guidance for future economic evaluations.

Methods

Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Econlit and NHS Economic Evaluation databases were searched (inception to December 2022) for economic evaluations of hospital-based TDM. Two authors reviewed the studies and extracted data. Overall quality of economic analysis reporting was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.

Results

Ten prospective studies (including six randomized studies) and nine retrospective studies were eligible. Overall study reporting was poor, publications meeting a median (range) of 61% (46–82%) of CHEERS checklist criteria. An antimicrobial TDM intervention for adult patients was the focus of most studies (n = 18). Variable clinical outcomes were reported, and length of stay was the primary economic outcome for most studies (n = 13). The majority of studies determined that TDM was economically and clinically favourable (n = 14), four studies reporting a cost-reduction in patient sub-populations.

Conclusions

Significant improvements in both economic and clinical outcomes may be realized with TDM interventions, particularly when targeted to complex patient populations. Attainment of therapeutic target could serve as a feasible surrogate measure of benefit for hospital-based TDM interventions. However, systematic reporting of economic outcomes is needed to inform investment decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信