减少输血前用药:质量改进项目。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
American Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1097/01.NAJ.0001027116.67274.e3
Ashley Hole, Alexandra Budhai, Kerry King, P Dayand Borge
{"title":"减少输血前用药:质量改进项目。","authors":"Ashley Hole, Alexandra Budhai, Kerry King, P Dayand Borge","doi":"10.1097/01.NAJ.0001027116.67274.e3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Premedication administration to patients who are to receive blood transfusions continues despite evidence of a lack of benefit when given to prevent febrile nonhemolytic or mild allergic transfusion reactions. Reviews of ordering practices and staff surveys on an adult inpatient hematology-oncology unit in our multisite oncology medical center indicated a lack of standardization and overuse of premedication in blood transfusions and a lack of knowledge of when it was appropriate to use premedication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed, and the evidence led to a proposal for a quality improvement (QI) project focused on development of an evidence-based algorithm to guide clinicians in when to administer which premedication, development of clear documentation for premedication plans, integration of the documented premedication plans into electronic orders for blood products, and staff education. Interventions included a hospital-wide algorithm and an electronic order to be integrated with a premedication plan for each patient on the adult hematology-oncology unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven months after implementation of the intervention, premedication use among patients decreased by 57.6%, and the transfusion reaction rate decreased from 1% to 0.8%. Staff knowledge as measured by responses to pre- and postintervention surveys on the appropriate use of premedication also improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence-based interventions can reduce the incidence of premedication use in patients receiving blood transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7622,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decreasing Premedication for Blood Transfusions: A Quality Improvement Project.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Hole, Alexandra Budhai, Kerry King, P Dayand Borge\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.NAJ.0001027116.67274.e3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Premedication administration to patients who are to receive blood transfusions continues despite evidence of a lack of benefit when given to prevent febrile nonhemolytic or mild allergic transfusion reactions. Reviews of ordering practices and staff surveys on an adult inpatient hematology-oncology unit in our multisite oncology medical center indicated a lack of standardization and overuse of premedication in blood transfusions and a lack of knowledge of when it was appropriate to use premedication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed, and the evidence led to a proposal for a quality improvement (QI) project focused on development of an evidence-based algorithm to guide clinicians in when to administer which premedication, development of clear documentation for premedication plans, integration of the documented premedication plans into electronic orders for blood products, and staff education. Interventions included a hospital-wide algorithm and an electronic order to be integrated with a premedication plan for each patient on the adult hematology-oncology unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven months after implementation of the intervention, premedication use among patients decreased by 57.6%, and the transfusion reaction rate decreased from 1% to 0.8%. Staff knowledge as measured by responses to pre- and postintervention surveys on the appropriate use of premedication also improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence-based interventions can reduce the incidence of premedication use in patients receiving blood transfusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001027116.67274.e3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001027116.67274.e3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有证据表明输血前用药对预防发热性非溶血性或轻度过敏性输血反应并无益处,但对即将接受输血的患者进行输血前用药的做法仍在继续。我们的多点肿瘤医疗中心对成人住院血液肿瘤科的下单实践和员工调查进行了审查,结果表明输血预处理缺乏标准化和过度使用,而且对何时适合使用预处理缺乏了解:方法: 我们进行了文献检索,并根据证据提出了一项质量改进(QI)项目提案,该项目重点在于制定循证算法以指导临床医生何时使用何种预处理药物、为预处理计划制定清晰的文件记录、将文件记录的预处理计划整合到血液制品的电子订单中以及开展员工教育。干预措施包括为成人血液肿瘤科的每位患者制定全院范围内的算法和与用药前计划相结合的电子医嘱:干预措施实施 7 个月后,患者的用药前剂量减少了 57.6%,输血反应率从 1%降至 0.8%。根据干预前和干预后调查的结果,工作人员对如何合理使用预处理药物的认识也有所提高:以证据为基础的干预措施可以降低输血患者使用预处理药物的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decreasing Premedication for Blood Transfusions: A Quality Improvement Project.

Background: Premedication administration to patients who are to receive blood transfusions continues despite evidence of a lack of benefit when given to prevent febrile nonhemolytic or mild allergic transfusion reactions. Reviews of ordering practices and staff surveys on an adult inpatient hematology-oncology unit in our multisite oncology medical center indicated a lack of standardization and overuse of premedication in blood transfusions and a lack of knowledge of when it was appropriate to use premedication.

Methods: A literature search was performed, and the evidence led to a proposal for a quality improvement (QI) project focused on development of an evidence-based algorithm to guide clinicians in when to administer which premedication, development of clear documentation for premedication plans, integration of the documented premedication plans into electronic orders for blood products, and staff education. Interventions included a hospital-wide algorithm and an electronic order to be integrated with a premedication plan for each patient on the adult hematology-oncology unit.

Results: Seven months after implementation of the intervention, premedication use among patients decreased by 57.6%, and the transfusion reaction rate decreased from 1% to 0.8%. Staff knowledge as measured by responses to pre- and postintervention surveys on the appropriate use of premedication also improved.

Conclusion: Evidence-based interventions can reduce the incidence of premedication use in patients receiving blood transfusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
604
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Nursing is the oldest and most honored broad-based nursing journal in the world. Peer reviewed and evidence-based, it is considered the profession’s premier journal. AJN adheres to journalistic standards that require transparency of real and potential conflicts of interests that authors,editors and reviewers may have. It follows publishing standards set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE; www.icmje.org), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME; www.wame.org), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; http://publicationethics.org/). AJN welcomes submissions of evidence-based clinical application papers and descriptions of best clinical practices, original research and QI reports, case studies, narratives, commentaries, and other manuscripts on a variety of clinical and professional topics. The journal also welcomes submissions for its various departments and columns, including artwork and poetry that is relevant to nursing or health care. Guidelines on writing for specific departments—Art of Nursing, Viewpoint, Policy and Politics, and Reflections—are available at http://AJN.edmgr.com. AJN''s mission is to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, discussion of relevant and controversial professional issues, adherence to the standards of journalistic integrity and excellence, and promotion of nursing perspectives to the health care community and the public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信