住院老年人潜在不当处方和药物不良反应模式的性别差异:SENATOR 试验结果。

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19071
Denis O'Mahony, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft, Adalsteinn Gudmundsson, Roy L Soiza, Mirko Petrovic, Antonio Cherubini, Stephen Byrne, Paula Rochon
{"title":"住院老年人潜在不当处方和药物不良反应模式的性别差异:SENATOR 试验结果。","authors":"Denis O'Mahony, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft, Adalsteinn Gudmundsson, Roy L Soiza, Mirko Petrovic, Antonio Cherubini, Stephen Byrne, Paula Rochon","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older women experience more adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than older men. However, the underlying basis for this sex difference is unclear. Sex (biological status) and/or gender (sociocultural constructs) influences on patterns of inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid older adults may be one reason for this ADR sex difference. In this secondary analysis, we examined whether incident ADR sex differences could be related to concurrent sex differences in potentially inappropriate prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective secondary analysis of sex differences in the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), potential prescribing omissions (PPOs), and ADRs among the 1537 participants (47.2% female, median [IQR] age 78 [72-84] years) was undertaken in the SENATOR clinical trial database, conducted in six large European medical centers.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>We looked specifically for male/female differences relating to PIMs and PPOs (defined by STOPP/START version 2 criteria) identified within 48 h of acute hospitalization. We also assessed sex differences for ADRs identified at 14 days from admission or discharge, whichever came first. ADRs were assessed by blinded endpoint adjudication panel consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During hospitalization, significantly more females experienced ≥1 ADR compared to males (28% and 21%, respectively; odds ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.78, p < 0.005). Nine of the 11 STOPP-criteria PIMs showing a significant sex difference occurred more often in females. Of the four START-criteria PPOs showing a significant sex difference, all occurred more often in females. Some sex-associated PIMs reflect higher prevalence of related conditions in older women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that specific STOPP-criteria PIMs and START-criteria PPOs were identified more frequently in older women than older men during acute hospitalization, possibly contributing to higher ADR incidence in older women. Prescribers should appreciate sex differences in exposure to potentially inappropriate prescribing and ADR risk, given the preponderance of older women over older men in most clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in patterns of potentially inappropriate prescribing and adverse drug reactions in hospitalized older people: Findings from the SENATOR trial.\",\"authors\":\"Denis O'Mahony, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft, Adalsteinn Gudmundsson, Roy L Soiza, Mirko Petrovic, Antonio Cherubini, Stephen Byrne, Paula Rochon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older women experience more adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than older men. However, the underlying basis for this sex difference is unclear. Sex (biological status) and/or gender (sociocultural constructs) influences on patterns of inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid older adults may be one reason for this ADR sex difference. In this secondary analysis, we examined whether incident ADR sex differences could be related to concurrent sex differences in potentially inappropriate prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective secondary analysis of sex differences in the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), potential prescribing omissions (PPOs), and ADRs among the 1537 participants (47.2% female, median [IQR] age 78 [72-84] years) was undertaken in the SENATOR clinical trial database, conducted in six large European medical centers.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>We looked specifically for male/female differences relating to PIMs and PPOs (defined by STOPP/START version 2 criteria) identified within 48 h of acute hospitalization. We also assessed sex differences for ADRs identified at 14 days from admission or discharge, whichever came first. ADRs were assessed by blinded endpoint adjudication panel consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During hospitalization, significantly more females experienced ≥1 ADR compared to males (28% and 21%, respectively; odds ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.78, p < 0.005). Nine of the 11 STOPP-criteria PIMs showing a significant sex difference occurred more often in females. Of the four START-criteria PPOs showing a significant sex difference, all occurred more often in females. Some sex-associated PIMs reflect higher prevalence of related conditions in older women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that specific STOPP-criteria PIMs and START-criteria PPOs were identified more frequently in older women than older men during acute hospitalization, possibly contributing to higher ADR incidence in older women. Prescribers should appreciate sex differences in exposure to potentially inappropriate prescribing and ADR risk, given the preponderance of older women over older men in most clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年女性比老年男性经历更多的药物不良反应(ADR)。然而,这种性别差异的根本原因尚不清楚。性别(生理状态)和/或性别(社会文化结构)对多病老年人不当处方模式的影响可能是造成这种 ADR 性别差异的原因之一。在这项二次分析中,我们研究了ADR性别差异是否与潜在不当处方的性别差异有关:我们在 SENATOR 临床试验数据库中对 1537 名参与者(47.2% 为女性,中位数[IQR]年龄为 78 [72-84] 岁)的潜在不当用药 (PIM)、潜在处方遗漏 (PPO) 和 ADR 发生率的性别差异进行了回顾性二次分析:我们专门研究了急性住院 48 小时内发现的 PIM 和 PPO(根据 STOPP/START 第 2 版标准定义)的男女差异。我们还评估了入院或出院(以先到者为准)14 天后发现的 ADR 的性别差异。ADR由盲法终点裁定小组一致评估:结果:在住院期间,发生≥1 例 ADR 的女性明显多于男性(分别为 28% 和 21%;几率比 1.40,95% CI 1.10-1.78,P 结论:我们得出结论,特定的 STOPP 临界值可用于评估 ADR:我们得出结论:在急性住院期间,老年女性比老年男性更频繁地发现特定的 STOPP 标准 PIMs 和 START 标准 PPOs,这可能是老年女性 ADR 发生率较高的原因之一。鉴于在大多数临床环境中,老年女性多于老年男性,因此处方者应了解潜在不当处方和 ADR 风险的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex differences in patterns of potentially inappropriate prescribing and adverse drug reactions in hospitalized older people: Findings from the SENATOR trial.

Background: Older women experience more adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than older men. However, the underlying basis for this sex difference is unclear. Sex (biological status) and/or gender (sociocultural constructs) influences on patterns of inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid older adults may be one reason for this ADR sex difference. In this secondary analysis, we examined whether incident ADR sex differences could be related to concurrent sex differences in potentially inappropriate prescribing.

Design and setting: A retrospective secondary analysis of sex differences in the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), potential prescribing omissions (PPOs), and ADRs among the 1537 participants (47.2% female, median [IQR] age 78 [72-84] years) was undertaken in the SENATOR clinical trial database, conducted in six large European medical centers.

Participants and methods: We looked specifically for male/female differences relating to PIMs and PPOs (defined by STOPP/START version 2 criteria) identified within 48 h of acute hospitalization. We also assessed sex differences for ADRs identified at 14 days from admission or discharge, whichever came first. ADRs were assessed by blinded endpoint adjudication panel consensus.

Results: During hospitalization, significantly more females experienced ≥1 ADR compared to males (28% and 21%, respectively; odds ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.78, p < 0.005). Nine of the 11 STOPP-criteria PIMs showing a significant sex difference occurred more often in females. Of the four START-criteria PPOs showing a significant sex difference, all occurred more often in females. Some sex-associated PIMs reflect higher prevalence of related conditions in older women.

Conclusion: We conclude that specific STOPP-criteria PIMs and START-criteria PPOs were identified more frequently in older women than older men during acute hospitalization, possibly contributing to higher ADR incidence in older women. Prescribers should appreciate sex differences in exposure to potentially inappropriate prescribing and ADR risk, given the preponderance of older women over older men in most clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信