政治家与气候变化:文献系统回顾

Brendan Moore, Lucas Geese, John Kenny, Harriet Dudley, Andrew Jordan, Alba Prados Pascual, Irene Lorenzoni, Simon Schaub, Joan Enguer, Jale Tosun
{"title":"政治家与气候变化:文献系统回顾","authors":"Brendan Moore, Lucas Geese, John Kenny, Harriet Dudley, Andrew Jordan, Alba Prados Pascual, Irene Lorenzoni, Simon Schaub, Joan Enguer, Jale Tosun","doi":"10.1002/wcc.908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Politicians' engagement with climate change is the focus of an emerging literature, but this research has not been subjected to systematic analysis. To address this important gap, we perform a systematic review of 141 articles on politicians and climate change published between 1985 and 2021. We find a growing research area; almost half of the articles were published after 2018. Existing research is fragmented and focused on a small number of democracies in the Global North, with the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Norway and Australia being the most‐heavily studied. Substantively, we analyze politicians' motivations, the incentives and barriers they face, and the strategies they employ to block/enable climate action. We find evidence of politicians being both intrinsically and extrinsically motivated. Intrinsic motivations often derive from formative experiences occurring prior to entering politics. Extrinsic motivations most commonly include publics/voters and external events. Importantly, intrinsic and extrinsic motivations vary in different political contexts, and indeed these two motivations may pull politicians in different directions. Politicians may employ various strategies—such as reframing—to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Moreover, politicians' motivations and strategies in relation to climate change are not static, but often vary. We conclude that there is an urgent need for research on how politicians are enabled and/or constrained by political system characteristics. Research is especially called for in the Global South and/or less democratic systems, as well as on investigating how politicians are (not) decarbonizing difficult‐to‐abate sectors and how they reconcile the sometimes‐competing demands for climate change mitigation and adaptation.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>Policy and Governance &gt; National Climate Change Policy</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Policy and Governance &gt; Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501019,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Climate Change","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politicians and climate change: A systematic review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Brendan Moore, Lucas Geese, John Kenny, Harriet Dudley, Andrew Jordan, Alba Prados Pascual, Irene Lorenzoni, Simon Schaub, Joan Enguer, Jale Tosun\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wcc.908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Politicians' engagement with climate change is the focus of an emerging literature, but this research has not been subjected to systematic analysis. To address this important gap, we perform a systematic review of 141 articles on politicians and climate change published between 1985 and 2021. We find a growing research area; almost half of the articles were published after 2018. Existing research is fragmented and focused on a small number of democracies in the Global North, with the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Norway and Australia being the most‐heavily studied. Substantively, we analyze politicians' motivations, the incentives and barriers they face, and the strategies they employ to block/enable climate action. We find evidence of politicians being both intrinsically and extrinsically motivated. Intrinsic motivations often derive from formative experiences occurring prior to entering politics. Extrinsic motivations most commonly include publics/voters and external events. Importantly, intrinsic and extrinsic motivations vary in different political contexts, and indeed these two motivations may pull politicians in different directions. Politicians may employ various strategies—such as reframing—to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Moreover, politicians' motivations and strategies in relation to climate change are not static, but often vary. We conclude that there is an urgent need for research on how politicians are enabled and/or constrained by political system characteristics. Research is especially called for in the Global South and/or less democratic systems, as well as on investigating how politicians are (not) decarbonizing difficult‐to‐abate sectors and how they reconcile the sometimes‐competing demands for climate change mitigation and adaptation.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\\\"simple\\\"> <jats:list-item>Policy and Governance &gt; National Climate Change Policy</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Policy and Governance &gt; Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs Climate Change\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs Climate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治家与气候变化的关系是新兴文献关注的焦点,但这些研究尚未经过系统分析。为了填补这一重要空白,我们对 1985 年至 2021 年间发表的 141 篇关于政治家与气候变化的文章进行了系统回顾。我们发现,这一研究领域正在不断扩大;近一半的文章发表于 2018 年之后。现有研究较为零散,主要集中在全球北方的少数几个民主国家,其中以美国、英国、德国、挪威和澳大利亚的研究最为深入。从实质上讲,我们分析了政治家的动机、他们面临的激励和障碍,以及他们阻止/促成气候行动的策略。我们发现政治家既有内在动机,也有外在动机。内在动机通常来自从政前的成长经历。外在动机通常包括公众/选民和外部事件。重要的是,内在动机和外在动机在不同的政治环境中各不相同,事实上,这两种动机可能会将政治家引向不同的方向。政治家可能会采用各种策略(如重新构思)来实现他们所期望的政策结果。此外,政治家在气候变化方面的动机和策略也不是一成不变的,而是经常变化的。我们的结论是,迫切需要对政治家如何受政治体制特征的影响和/或制约进行研究。尤其需要对全球南部和/或民主程度较低的制度进行研究,并调查政治家如何(不)对难以消减的部门进行去碳化,以及他们如何协调有时相互冲突的减缓和适应气候变化的需求:政策与治理 > 国家气候变化政策 政策与治理 > 多层次和跨国气候变化治理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Politicians and climate change: A systematic review of the literature
Politicians' engagement with climate change is the focus of an emerging literature, but this research has not been subjected to systematic analysis. To address this important gap, we perform a systematic review of 141 articles on politicians and climate change published between 1985 and 2021. We find a growing research area; almost half of the articles were published after 2018. Existing research is fragmented and focused on a small number of democracies in the Global North, with the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Norway and Australia being the most‐heavily studied. Substantively, we analyze politicians' motivations, the incentives and barriers they face, and the strategies they employ to block/enable climate action. We find evidence of politicians being both intrinsically and extrinsically motivated. Intrinsic motivations often derive from formative experiences occurring prior to entering politics. Extrinsic motivations most commonly include publics/voters and external events. Importantly, intrinsic and extrinsic motivations vary in different political contexts, and indeed these two motivations may pull politicians in different directions. Politicians may employ various strategies—such as reframing—to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Moreover, politicians' motivations and strategies in relation to climate change are not static, but often vary. We conclude that there is an urgent need for research on how politicians are enabled and/or constrained by political system characteristics. Research is especially called for in the Global South and/or less democratic systems, as well as on investigating how politicians are (not) decarbonizing difficult‐to‐abate sectors and how they reconcile the sometimes‐competing demands for climate change mitigation and adaptation.This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > National Climate Change Policy Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信