评估巴西队列中乳腺癌多基因风险评分的风险分层。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
{"title":"评估巴西队列中乳腺癌多基因风险评分的风险分层。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer have a clear clinical utility in risk prediction. PRS transferability across populations and ancestry groups is hampered by population-specific factors, ultimately leading to differences in variant effects, such as linkage disequilibrium and differences in variant frequency (allele frequency differences). Thus, locally sourced population-based phenotypic and genomic data sets are essential to assess the validity of PRSs derived from signals detected across populations. This study assesses the transferability of a breast cancer PRS composed of 313 risk variants (313-PRS) in a Brazilian trihybrid admixed ancestries (European, African, and Native American) whole-genome sequenced cohort, the Rare Genomes Project. 313-PRS was computed in the Rare Genomes Project (<em>n</em> = 853) using the UK Biobank (UKBB; <em>n</em> = 264,307) as reference. The Brazilian cohorts have a high European ancestry (EA) component, with allele frequency differences and to a lesser extent linkage disequilibrium patterns similar to those found in EA populations. The 313-PRS distribution was found to be inflated when compared with that of the UKBB, leading to potential overestimation of PRS-based risk if EA is taken as a standard. However, case controls lead to equivalent predictive power when compared with UKBB-EA samples with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.66 to 0.62 compared with 0.63 for UKBB.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Risk Stratification of Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Scores in a Brazilian Cohort\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer have a clear clinical utility in risk prediction. PRS transferability across populations and ancestry groups is hampered by population-specific factors, ultimately leading to differences in variant effects, such as linkage disequilibrium and differences in variant frequency (allele frequency differences). Thus, locally sourced population-based phenotypic and genomic data sets are essential to assess the validity of PRSs derived from signals detected across populations. This study assesses the transferability of a breast cancer PRS composed of 313 risk variants (313-PRS) in a Brazilian trihybrid admixed ancestries (European, African, and Native American) whole-genome sequenced cohort, the Rare Genomes Project. 313-PRS was computed in the Rare Genomes Project (<em>n</em> = 853) using the UK Biobank (UKBB; <em>n</em> = 264,307) as reference. The Brazilian cohorts have a high European ancestry (EA) component, with allele frequency differences and to a lesser extent linkage disequilibrium patterns similar to those found in EA populations. The 313-PRS distribution was found to be inflated when compared with that of the UKBB, leading to potential overestimation of PRS-based risk if EA is taken as a standard. However, case controls lead to equivalent predictive power when compared with UKBB-EA samples with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.66 to 0.62 compared with 0.63 for UKBB.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001508\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳腺癌(BC)的多基因风险评分(PRS)在风险预测方面具有明显的临床效用。PRS在不同人群和祖先群体之间的可转移性受到人群特异性因素的影响,最终导致变异效应的差异,如连锁不平衡(LD)和变异频率差异(AF-diff)。因此,本地来源的基于种群的表型和基因组数据集对于评估从跨种群检测到的信号中得出的 PRS 的有效性至关重要。在这里,我们评估了由 313 个风险变异组成的 BC PRS(313-PRS)在巴西三混血混血祖先(欧洲人、非洲人和美洲原住民)全基因组测序队列 GRAR 中的可转移性。我们以英国生物库(UKBB,n=264,307)为参照,计算了 GRAR(n=853)的 313-PRS 值。我们的研究表明,虽然巴西队列中欧洲(EA)成分较多,AF-diff 模式(其次是 LD 模式)与 EA 人群中发现的模式相似,但与英国生物库相比,313-PRS 的分布被夸大了,如果将 EA 作为标准,可能会高估基于 PRS 的风险。有趣的是,我们发现与 UKBB-EA 样本相比,病例控制具有同等的预测能力,其 AUROC 值为 0.66-0.62,而 UKBB 为 0.63。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Risk Stratification of Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Scores in a Brazilian Cohort

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer have a clear clinical utility in risk prediction. PRS transferability across populations and ancestry groups is hampered by population-specific factors, ultimately leading to differences in variant effects, such as linkage disequilibrium and differences in variant frequency (allele frequency differences). Thus, locally sourced population-based phenotypic and genomic data sets are essential to assess the validity of PRSs derived from signals detected across populations. This study assesses the transferability of a breast cancer PRS composed of 313 risk variants (313-PRS) in a Brazilian trihybrid admixed ancestries (European, African, and Native American) whole-genome sequenced cohort, the Rare Genomes Project. 313-PRS was computed in the Rare Genomes Project (n = 853) using the UK Biobank (UKBB; n = 264,307) as reference. The Brazilian cohorts have a high European ancestry (EA) component, with allele frequency differences and to a lesser extent linkage disequilibrium patterns similar to those found in EA populations. The 313-PRS distribution was found to be inflated when compared with that of the UKBB, leading to potential overestimation of PRS-based risk if EA is taken as a standard. However, case controls lead to equivalent predictive power when compared with UKBB-EA samples with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.66 to 0.62 compared with 0.63 for UKBB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
143
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信