作为阿尔茨海默病潜在早期标志物的中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Mediators of Inflammation Pub Date : 2024-06-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6640130
Carlo Cervellati, Dario Pedrini, Pietro Pirro, Paola Guindani, Carlo Renzini, Gloria Brombo, Giovanni Zuliani
{"title":"作为阿尔茨海默病潜在早期标志物的中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率","authors":"Carlo Cervellati, Dario Pedrini, Pietro Pirro, Paola Guindani, Carlo Renzini, Gloria Brombo, Giovanni Zuliani","doi":"10.1155/2024/6640130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a noninvasive, inexpensive, and easily applicable marker of inflammation. Since immune dysregulation leading to inflammation is regarded as a hallmark of dementia, in particular Alzheimer's disease (AD), we decided to investigate the potentials of NLR as a diagnostic and predictive biomarker in this clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>NLR was measured in the blood of patients with AD (<i>n</i> = 103), amnestic type mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, <i>n</i> = 212), vascular dementia (VAD, <i>n</i> = 34), and cognitively healthy Controls (<i>n</i> = 61). One hundred twelve MCI patients underwent a regular clinical follow-up. Over a 36-months median follow-up, 80 remained stable, while 32 progressed to overt dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NLR was higher in patients with aMCI or dementia compared to Controls; however, the difference was statistically significant only for aMCI (+13%, <i>p</i>=0.04) and AD (+20%, <i>p</i>=0.03). These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis, which showed that high NLR was associated with an increase in the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of aMCI (odd ratio (OR): 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-4.89) or AD (OR: 3.13, 95%CI: 1.47-6.70), but not of VAD. NLR did not differ when comparing stable vs. progressing aMCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report showing that NLR is significantly increased in MCI and AD but not in VAD. We also found that NLR was unable to predict the conversion from aMCI to AD. Further research on larger cohorts is warranted to definitely ascertain the application of NLR as a possible marker for aMCI and AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18371,"journal":{"name":"Mediators of Inflammation","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6640130"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutrophil-Lymphocytes Ratio as Potential Early Marker for Alzheimer's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Cervellati, Dario Pedrini, Pietro Pirro, Paola Guindani, Carlo Renzini, Gloria Brombo, Giovanni Zuliani\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/6640130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a noninvasive, inexpensive, and easily applicable marker of inflammation. Since immune dysregulation leading to inflammation is regarded as a hallmark of dementia, in particular Alzheimer's disease (AD), we decided to investigate the potentials of NLR as a diagnostic and predictive biomarker in this clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>NLR was measured in the blood of patients with AD (<i>n</i> = 103), amnestic type mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, <i>n</i> = 212), vascular dementia (VAD, <i>n</i> = 34), and cognitively healthy Controls (<i>n</i> = 61). One hundred twelve MCI patients underwent a regular clinical follow-up. Over a 36-months median follow-up, 80 remained stable, while 32 progressed to overt dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NLR was higher in patients with aMCI or dementia compared to Controls; however, the difference was statistically significant only for aMCI (+13%, <i>p</i>=0.04) and AD (+20%, <i>p</i>=0.03). These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis, which showed that high NLR was associated with an increase in the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of aMCI (odd ratio (OR): 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-4.89) or AD (OR: 3.13, 95%CI: 1.47-6.70), but not of VAD. NLR did not differ when comparing stable vs. progressing aMCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report showing that NLR is significantly increased in MCI and AD but not in VAD. We also found that NLR was unable to predict the conversion from aMCI to AD. Further research on larger cohorts is warranted to definitely ascertain the application of NLR as a possible marker for aMCI and AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediators of Inflammation\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"6640130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227945/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediators of Inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6640130\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediators of Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6640130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是一种无创、廉价且易于应用的炎症标记物。由于导致炎症的免疫调节失调被认为是痴呆症,尤其是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的标志,因此我们决定研究 NLR 作为临床诊断和预测生物标志物的潜力:在 AD(103 人)、失忆型轻度认知障碍(212 人)、血管性痴呆(34 人)和认知健康对照组(61 人)患者的血液中测量 NLR。112 名 MCI 患者接受了定期临床随访。在36个月的中位随访中,80例保持稳定,32例发展为明显痴呆:与对照组相比,aMCI 或痴呆症患者的 NLR 较高;但只有 aMCI(+13%,P=0.04)和 AD(+20%,P=0.03)患者的 NLR 差异具有统计学意义。多变量逻辑分析证实了这些结果,该分析表明,高 NLR 与被诊断为 aMCI(奇数比 (OR):2.58,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.36-4.89)或 AD(OR:3.13,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.47-6.70)的可能性增加有关,但与 VAD 无关。在比较稳定型与进展型 aMCI 时,NLR 没有差异:这是第一份显示 NLR 在 MCI 和 AD 中显著升高而在 VAD 中不升高的报告。我们还发现,NLR 无法预测 aMCI 向 AD 的转化。我们有必要对更大的群体进行进一步研究,以确定 NLR 作为 aMCI 和 AD 的可能标志物的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neutrophil-Lymphocytes Ratio as Potential Early Marker for Alzheimer's Disease.

Background: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a noninvasive, inexpensive, and easily applicable marker of inflammation. Since immune dysregulation leading to inflammation is regarded as a hallmark of dementia, in particular Alzheimer's disease (AD), we decided to investigate the potentials of NLR as a diagnostic and predictive biomarker in this clinical setting.

Materials and methods: NLR was measured in the blood of patients with AD (n = 103), amnestic type mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, n = 212), vascular dementia (VAD, n = 34), and cognitively healthy Controls (n = 61). One hundred twelve MCI patients underwent a regular clinical follow-up. Over a 36-months median follow-up, 80 remained stable, while 32 progressed to overt dementia.

Results: NLR was higher in patients with aMCI or dementia compared to Controls; however, the difference was statistically significant only for aMCI (+13%, p=0.04) and AD (+20%, p=0.03). These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis, which showed that high NLR was associated with an increase in the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of aMCI (odd ratio (OR): 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-4.89) or AD (OR: 3.13, 95%CI: 1.47-6.70), but not of VAD. NLR did not differ when comparing stable vs. progressing aMCI.

Conclusions: This is the first report showing that NLR is significantly increased in MCI and AD but not in VAD. We also found that NLR was unable to predict the conversion from aMCI to AD. Further research on larger cohorts is warranted to definitely ascertain the application of NLR as a possible marker for aMCI and AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mediators of Inflammation
Mediators of Inflammation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Mediators of Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles on all types of inflammatory mediators, including cytokines, histamine, bradykinin, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, PAF, biological response modifiers and the family of cell adhesion-promoting molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信