机器人辅助脊柱手术--综述。

Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-21 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.21037/jss-23-40
Christopher L Antonacci, Francine Zeng, Andrew Block, Annabelle Davey, Heeren Makanji
{"title":"机器人辅助脊柱手术--综述。","authors":"Christopher L Antonacci, Francine Zeng, Andrew Block, Annabelle Davey, Heeren Makanji","doi":"10.21037/jss-23-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Emerging technologies have increasingly been adopted in spine surgery in the attempt to increase precision and improve outcomes. Robotic assistance is an area of significant interest, with proposed benefits including increased accuracy, decreased complication rates, and decreased radiation exposure. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the currently available robotic assistance systems and their associated outcomes and limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of national databases was performed using key terms \"robotic\", \"spine\", and \"surgery\" for literature from 2014 to 2023. Studies that aimed to describe the utilities of endoscopic surgeries, associated outcomes, limitations, and future directions were included. Studies that were not in English were excluded.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>This review includes a brief overview of the history of robotic spine surgery as well as its clinical outcomes, limitations, and future directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-assisted spine surgery has seen increasing use in the attempt to increase precision and improve outcomes and has been associated with increased accuracy in pedicle screw placement and decreased complication rates. Barriers to its adoption include a significant learning curve, possibly longer operative cases, and significant associated costs. As robotic assistance continues to become increasingly popular in spine surgery, it is critical for surgeons to understand the technology available and the associated outcomes to make informed decisions when considering which system to incorporate into their practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 2","pages":"305-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic-assisted spine surgery-a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher L Antonacci, Francine Zeng, Andrew Block, Annabelle Davey, Heeren Makanji\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jss-23-40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Emerging technologies have increasingly been adopted in spine surgery in the attempt to increase precision and improve outcomes. Robotic assistance is an area of significant interest, with proposed benefits including increased accuracy, decreased complication rates, and decreased radiation exposure. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the currently available robotic assistance systems and their associated outcomes and limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of national databases was performed using key terms \\\"robotic\\\", \\\"spine\\\", and \\\"surgery\\\" for literature from 2014 to 2023. Studies that aimed to describe the utilities of endoscopic surgeries, associated outcomes, limitations, and future directions were included. Studies that were not in English were excluded.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>This review includes a brief overview of the history of robotic spine surgery as well as its clinical outcomes, limitations, and future directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-assisted spine surgery has seen increasing use in the attempt to increase precision and improve outcomes and has been associated with increased accuracy in pedicle screw placement and decreased complication rates. Barriers to its adoption include a significant learning curve, possibly longer operative cases, and significant associated costs. As robotic assistance continues to become increasingly popular in spine surgery, it is critical for surgeons to understand the technology available and the associated outcomes to make informed decisions when considering which system to incorporate into their practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"305-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224789/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:脊柱手术越来越多地采用新兴技术,以提高精确度并改善手术效果。机器人辅助是一个备受关注的领域,其优点包括提高精确度、降低并发症发生率和减少辐射暴露。本综述旨在概述目前可用的机器人辅助系统及其相关结果和局限性:方法:使用关键术语 "机器人"、"脊柱 "和 "手术 "对国家数据库中 2014 年至 2023 年的文献进行了回顾。纳入了旨在描述内窥镜手术的实用性、相关结果、局限性和未来发展方向的研究。主要内容和研究结果:本综述简要概述了机器人脊柱手术的历史、临床结果、局限性和未来发展方向:机器人辅助脊柱手术的应用日益广泛,旨在提高精确度和改善疗效,并与椎弓根螺钉置入的精确度提高和并发症发生率降低有关。其应用障碍包括学习曲线较长、手术时间可能较长以及相关费用较高。随着机器人辅助技术在脊柱手术中的应用日益普及,外科医生必须了解现有的技术和相关的结果,以便在考虑将哪种系统纳入自己的实践中时做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic-assisted spine surgery-a narrative review.

Background and objective: Emerging technologies have increasingly been adopted in spine surgery in the attempt to increase precision and improve outcomes. Robotic assistance is an area of significant interest, with proposed benefits including increased accuracy, decreased complication rates, and decreased radiation exposure. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the currently available robotic assistance systems and their associated outcomes and limitations.

Methods: A review of national databases was performed using key terms "robotic", "spine", and "surgery" for literature from 2014 to 2023. Studies that aimed to describe the utilities of endoscopic surgeries, associated outcomes, limitations, and future directions were included. Studies that were not in English were excluded.

Key content and findings: This review includes a brief overview of the history of robotic spine surgery as well as its clinical outcomes, limitations, and future directions.

Conclusions: Robotic-assisted spine surgery has seen increasing use in the attempt to increase precision and improve outcomes and has been associated with increased accuracy in pedicle screw placement and decreased complication rates. Barriers to its adoption include a significant learning curve, possibly longer operative cases, and significant associated costs. As robotic assistance continues to become increasingly popular in spine surgery, it is critical for surgeons to understand the technology available and the associated outcomes to make informed decisions when considering which system to incorporate into their practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信